Buy Used
$3.99
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Acceptable | Details
Condition: Used: Acceptable
Comment: Fast Shipping - Safe and Secure Bubble Mailer!
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? Hardcover – Deckle Edge, April 6, 2010


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover, Deckle Edge, April 6, 2010
$5.19 $0.01

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Hero Quick Promo
Browse in Books with Buzz and explore more details on selected titles, including the current pick, "The Good Girl" by Mary Kubica.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 352 pages
  • Publisher: Simon & Schuster; 1 edition (April 6, 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1416541624
  • ISBN-13: 978-1416541622
  • Product Dimensions: 1 x 5.9 x 9.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (84 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #911,618 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Starred Review. Shapiro, author of the much admired A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare: 1599, achieves another major success in the field of Shakespeare research by exploring why the Bard's authorship of his works has been so much challenged. Step-by step, Shapiro describes how criticism of Shakespeare frequently evolved into attacks on his literacy and character. Actual challenges to the authorship of the Shakespeare canon originated with an outright fraud perpetrated by William-Henry Ireland in the 1790s and continued through the years with an almost religious fervor. Shapiro exposes one such forgery: the earliest known document, dating from 1805, challenging Shakespeare's authorship and proposing instead Francis Bacon. Shapiro mines previously unexamined documents to probe why brilliant men and women denied Shakespeare's authorship. For Mark Twain, Shapiro finds that the notion resonated with his belief that John Milton, not John Bunyan, wrote The Pilgrim's Progress. Sigmund Freud's support of the earl of Oxford as the author of Shakespeare appears to have involved a challenge to his Oedipus theory, which was based partly on his reading of Hamlet. As Shapiro admirably demonstrates, William Shakespeare emerges with his name and reputation intact. 16 pages of b&w photos. (Apr.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

James Shapiro is the Larry Miller Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University, where he has taught since 1985. Born and raised in Brooklyn, New York, he studied at Columbia and the University of Chicago. He is the author of several books, most recently A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare: 1599. He has been awarded numerous fellowships and grants from institutions such as the Guggenheim Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the New York Public Library’s Cullman Center for Scholars and Writers. He has written for The New York Times, the Financial Times, the Los Angeles Times, and other publications. Mr. Shapiro lives in New York with his wife and son.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

An engaging and fun read.
JennyH
(I do not know to what extent this may have been done and with what results, though if anything significant had been found, I would have read of it.
T.R. Catanzarite
Shapiro identifies Roscius as a Roman actor, but somehow extends this as evidence that Stratford thought of Shakespeare as a playwright.
Rory1959

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

142 of 206 people found the following review helpful By R. Hardy HALL OF FAMETOP 500 REVIEWER on April 4, 2010
Format: Hardcover
I can't remember, but I think it was Woody Allen who wrote the joke: The plays of William Shakespeare were not written by Shakespeare himself, but by someone with the same name. The only reason the joke works is that for a couple of centuries there have been skeptics who have denied that Shakespeare's works were actually the works of Shakespeare. In _Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare?_ (Simon and Schuster), it's not a surprise that James Shapiro answers the question in the subtitle the way he does: Shakespeare did. After all, Shapiro is a Shakespeare scholar whose most recent book was a look at one year (1599) in Shakespeare's life and how the plays he was writing were formed by the political and social environment of that time. So, yes, "He would say that, wouldn't he?" will be the response from the current skeptics, all of whom have their own candidate for the position of Bard. Shapiro's book, indeed, puts an unassailable case for Shakespeare of Stratford being the author, but that is only at the end. Everything that goes before is a history of the anti-Stratfordian movement. It is a wonderfully clear explanation of why skeptics started going wrong and have continued vehemently on their wrong paths. It is an entertaining and often hilarious tale, a path strewn, as Shapiro says, with "fabricated documents, embellished lives, concealed identity, pseudonymous authorship, contested evidence, bald-faced deception, and a failure to grasp what could not be imagined."

There is no evidence that anyone in Shakespeare's time thought that the plays came from anyone else. In fact, it was only a couple of centuries after his death that doubters started piping up.
Read more ›
348 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
36 of 52 people found the following review helpful By Anson Cassel Mills on June 30, 2010
Format: Hardcover
Usually a book's subtitle clarifies its title, especially if it's a pun. In this case, the subtitle misleads by implying that Shapiro will describe (perhaps seriatim) the leading candidates in what is often grandly called the "Authorship Controversy."

That's not quite what Shapiro has in mind. His purpose is to discuss not the candidates themselves but the reasons why proponents of their authorship have advanced their claims. Shapiro makes a number of cogent arguments in the explication. One is that during the nineteenth century, Romantics came to believe that art must of necessity be an expression of the creator's inner self rather than simply an exercise of imagination.

Even more importantly, Shapiro delineates the connection between the Authorship Controversy and the rise of higher criticism, especially of the sort that challenged previously accepted truths of the Bible. As Shapiro correctly notes, the shock waves of higher criticism "threatened that lesser deity Shakespeare, for his biography too rested precariously on the unstable foundation of posthumous reports and more than a fair share of myths." (74-74)

Several of the major players in contesting Shakespeare's authorship, notably Delia Bacon and Mark Twain, were reared as orthodox Christians and were in simultaneous revolt against both the Bible and Shakespeare. With a bit of squinting and tweaking, one could (though Shapiro does not) also develop plausible religious theories for the rejection of Shakespeare's authorship by, Sigmund Freud, Henry James, Helen Keller, and John Thomas Looney.

Shapiro writes sprightly prose and has a gift for illustrating his general themes with specific, often ironic, examples.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 8 people found the following review helpful By Everett P. Goldner on September 19, 2013
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I bought this book sight unseen, hoping to find nothing more or less than a simple presentation of the merits of each candidate's claim for authorship. "Contested Will" is not that; however, having read it through, I suspect that Shapiro felt that he would better serve the issue by calling attention to the long-entrenched biases in each camp than by attempting to present "the facts" -- any given fact being, of course, a matter of dispute or irrelevant to the other camp. Perhaps a truly fair, unbiased account of the Authorship Question could only be written if Stratfordians and Oxfordians worked together to produce it, and as Jim Broadbent once chortled in 'Gangs of New York' -- "that will only happen in the reign of Queen Dick! (That means it will never happen.)"

As a relative newcomer to the Authorship Question, I find Shapiro's detailings of the grounds on which the Baconian and Oxfordian views developed to be fascinating stuff; how else could you connect the likes of Mark Twain to Hellen Keller, Freud to Derek Jacobi? Now, I will admit my own bias: I agreed with Shapiro's view -- that the author was indeed the Man from Stratford -- before I came to this book, and the case he makes in the chapter devoted to the Stratford Man's authorship vibes with what I had already begun to articulate for myself: it just makes sense. The alternative theories, from Oxford to Bacon and onward, always eventually creak and collapse because they're not built on anything substantial (hundreds of uses of the word "ever" throughout the Canon do not make a convincing case for the mastermind 'E. Vere' repeatedly punning on his name.)

Ah, but HOW could the country bumpkin have done it?
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?