Most Helpful Customer Reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Conversations About the End of Time, June 18, 2002
This review is from: Conversations About the End of Time (Paperback)
Conversations About the End of Time is a a discussion of questions and answers given by four thinkers. Stephen Jay Gould, Umberto Eco, Jean-Claude Carriere and Jean Delumeau all answer questions and are given a chapter in this book to espouse their respective answers. Just think of a coffee table discussion, of a one on one discussion and you get to read the answers on questions of import. Each answering these questions with their respective insights and down-to-earth style. Each having their respective life experiences to draw from to unravel perplexing questions. With fascination you read the thought-provoking answers. The answers will suprise some, others may be right inline with what you'd expect, but nerver boring... challenging, educational, lucid and erudite are more what you'd expect and you are not dissapointed. This book reads fast and the questions are cogent with the general topic. Each respective thinker answers in a style of their own and the reader does not feel irrelevant. This is an interesting book in that questions asked make the reader think as well. I found the book to be highly interesting and it has a fascination woven throughout the text captivating the reader.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Diversity is not all, December 15, 2004
This work does not really hang together very well. Each of the respective contributors does his own thing.
The work contains according to the book - jacket these essays. " Paleontologist Stephen Jay Goud on dating the Creation, evolutionary ' deep time' and the need for ecological ethics on a human scale. Novelist, medievalist and Web fanatic UmbertoEco on the breave new world of cyberspace, and its likely impact on memory, cultural continuity and access toknowledge. Catholic historian Jean Delumeau on how the Western Imagination has always been haunted by ideas of the Apocalypse. ScreenwriterJean- Claude Carriere on the 'art of slowness' and attitudes toward time in non- Western cultures.'
The work nonetheless contains much interesting information and speculative matter.
One small piece from the work, the great Paleontologist Goud is asked " How do you see earth looking in a thousand years time? '
His answer is humble and refreshing.
" I don't see it. The things one can actually predict are not very interesting. The sun will continue to shine.. But the history of human beings-and that's what your question is about - consists only of unpredictable events. What we are least weel- placed to predict is technological evolution. I can't predict what will happen in fifty years, let alone in a thousand.. Culture evolves in a Lamarckian way, in that it allows the transmission of acquired characteristics. We directly transmit what we have learned to subsequent generations, which is why technological evolution is ultra- powerful, cumulative , directional ..
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good guides!, March 17, 2002
This review is from: Conversations About the End of Time (Paperback)
Surely, we can't talk and think enough about the state of mankind! But these are hazardous waters! Where should we begin and where do we want to go from there? So, Having Gould and Eco as guides seems like a clever start! According to the book, the hebrew language has no exact present tense?? The infinitely brief, the very essense of the present, is not to be found - it can be neither fixed, nor measured. It is therefore completely justifiable, grammaticale speaking, to leave out the present? Yet, obviously, it is from the present we look at the past and towards the future. Stephen Jay Gould is always a pleasure to listen to - and the right one to put time into perspective. For a palaeontologist, like Gould, 7000 years (timespand of human culture) is really no more than the twinkling of an eye. So all we know is really in the present - which hardly exist! From this position we look out into concepts like the eternity - which we obviously really can't grasp. And into ourselfes were e.g. DNA was discovered as recently as 1953. Mystery upon mystery. So, we struggle to discover instances of regularity and to fit them together with the help of stories. We throw in a little religion "were religions do not ask questions, they answer them". Still we are far removed from any real "understanding". And that is what these conversations are about. With Umberto Eco and Stephen Jay Gould - it is of course an ok read. But only an appetizer. -Simon
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|