Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A comfortable read, April 26, 2008
This review is from: The Conversion (Hardcover)
Saturday, April 25, 2008. I read The Conversion cover to cover today. While I read it entirely in one sitting, I didn't do that because it was so suspenseful that I couldn't put it down. Instead I found Olshan's latest to be a very comfortable read.
It is hard for me to describe, but somehow reading The Conversion was like reading one of my travel journals from 10 years ago. Familiar, but with enough time and distance had passed so that details of the events seemed new. Because the characters and story seemed familiar, this was an easy and very comfortable book to read.
Though many of the story's elements are anything but comfortable--the hotel invasion at gun/knife point and the entire topic of sero-converting--the characters handle these situations like people I know would handle them. I found myself bringing my life into the reading of this book as much as this book brought new topics and details to my life.
While there were dramatic situations in The Conversion, the overall feeling of the book is one of a subtle, yet nagging, mystery that winds through all the character's lives.
It always amazes me when a book can make me feel this involved and this comfortable with new characters that instantly feel familiar.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A literary self-reflection that entangles on itself, May 26, 2008
This review is from: The Conversion (Hardcover)
Let me start off by saying that this book is written in a more literary style, and I don't intend that to denigrate, particularly because of the book's self-reflective quality. At one point, the main character Russell (who is a one-time-published author) remarks on another character's (also an author) work's accessibility (he had feared it would be written in an overly literary style), and I wondered if the author was expressing his own concerns about the novel, right there within it, out of the mouth of the main character. Speaking of the main character, I found he treads just on the border of likability - he comes across as a defeatist in search of a happiness that he will never let himself have, buffering his ego with affairs with married men and delaying his own realization as an author by his own infatuation with the obfuscation of his own skills by his obsession with the literary world society and the gentrified world of the American seeking some sort of entry into a class they can never truly belong to by immersing themselves in European culture and language. The main character's one relationship with another man who is truly available to him is more about his own relationship with how he perceives his own credibility, as an author, and just adds to his gloomy introspectiveness. The real relationship in the book is between the main character and an Italian woman, Marina (you guessed it, also an author although a wealthy and established one), whose villa Russell is recovering in after an unusual (and somewhat unbelievable) turn of events. Marina is actually for me the best developed and most likable character in the book, and she's the pivot point around which Russell's self-conception evolves. It's really the only genuine relationship Russell has. The book is very well written, and it is accessible despite the "literary" prose, but at the end of the novel I felt that some of Russell's "progress" was just a veneer. Maybe that was what the book was trying to accomplish, was to show that although he had changed during the experiences he was having, that in the end he can't escape his own nature. Still, I was left feeling a little cheated at the end, as if I deserved something more revealing, something that would have left Russell as more empathetic, more a person with something to say to me, not just to himself. In the end, I don't think Russell really sees a way to move on from his own selfishness, just a way to develop it in a different direction.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Poor Ending, July 5, 2008
This review is from: The Conversion (Hardcover)
While THE CONVERSION is, at times, beautifully rendered, rarely have I completed a book and felt such a sense of disappointment. Perhaps this was because the evocative, fast-moving--and, yes, sexy--opening 75 pages made me feel I was in for something special, and yet the ending dawdled, looped back onto itself, and finally dwindled into mere nothingness. Loose ends were not tied up. (Who were the intruders? Were they hired assassins? Who threw the rock? Who received the insurance $$$? Why couldn't/didn't Russell find SOME SORT of substantive love?) While I had a sense that a "conversion" was taking place within Russell, at end I simply couldn't tell you just what this was. It was far too subtle, if it occurred at all. Frankly, he seemed much the same as he did at the book's inception. And even on the final page the reader is given a new twist regarding the book's European publication that seems to solve nothing and, frankly, just made no sense to me. THE CONVERSION is like a fast-burning firecracker: startling bright and beautiful at the beginning, at end one is left with the charred remains of only what could have been...
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|