Customer Reviews

Corpus Christi

5 star:		(5)
4 star:		(5)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(4)

 

 

I had read about this play in TIME mag. about two years ago, and when I read I expected something frustrating and that is what I got. I am so tempted to talk about my faith in comparison to the play and since I am an avid Christian I find it continually difficult to not write about, but instead I am going to tackle it from a theatre student's point of view. It is terribly original. After reading most of the contemporary playwrights I would have to say that McNally's plays are the best, because of his subtley abrasive tone, for one reason. I was constantly questioning whether or not I should consider this play sacreligous and after much deliberation I decided that only the reader/viewer can decide that for themselves. Is McNally mocking Christ's life? I don't know. Is he accurately pouring his emotions out onto the paper? Definetly. In my opinion this play is one of the best "philosophy meets religion" works out there which is testament to McNally's genius. In his preface he contrasts Christ's life to Matthew Shepard, which I thought was really cool. Then he also says "Jesus Christ died again when Matthew Shepard did"...so true. I think that this play really asks the question "what would we do today?" Would we still persecute Him? Would we still laugh and jeer and call him "King of the queers"? Anyway I'm rambling...read the play and judge McNally with an open mind.

For as much nasty publicity as this play has received, I expected a far more abrasive account of a gay passion play. If you are expecting anything remotely pornographic, you will be disappointed. This is a very intimate, touching portrait of playwright Terrence McNally, juxtaposed against the birth, life and death of Jesus Christ, all in the spirit of the playwright seeking a higher awareness of Christ's difficult life and great torments. The narrative is extremely straight forward, and an informed audience should have no problem discerning the differences between McNally's life and Christ's. McNally, no stranger to controversy, has created an entirely new Messiah; one that reflects contemporary human experience and its temptations from flawed, human perspective. Those who do not wish to see the human side of Jesus as an imagined homosexual should mind their business and go to church for their preferred depiction. Anyone interested in how one observant gay man views his own life in reference to Christs's suffering may see more of themselves in the play than they might expect. There is little high drama here, and the play straightforwardly warns against suspense. The storytelling is simple and patient, and worth the time if you have an open mind and especially an open heart.

I really do not know where to begin. Terrence McNally has been my favorite playwright for years, and I have read every title I could get my hands on, including the obscure ones (Such as "By The Sea..." and "Tommy Flowers"). He deals with sensitive topics with sheer honesty and compassion. He doesn't just write about characters, he portrays humanity on paper, and he does an amazing job. My opinion of Corpus Christi is summed up best with a simple "Wow." I am in awe. Spellbound by McNally's ability to convey the life of Christ in such a touching manner. I'm well aware of all the controversy this stirred upon it's MTC premiere, and have been fortunate enough to view it at a university in my area, which also stirred a little mud of it's own. But what can you expect? I doubt McNally would have published such an artistic play unknowing that it would cause everything it did. But back to reviewing the play: Never before has Christ been depicted in such a way on stage, and I don't believe that the playwright is saying "Christ WAS gay," simply making the notion, and in what better way to do so? When gay culture is at it's peak, TODAY, placing Christ and his followers in society today yet never losing it's honesty. Corpus Christi remains my favorite McNally drama to date, because of it's "In-Your-Face" way of dealing with a subject often swept under the table. I applaud you!

I did not purchase this play without expecting to be shocked. I found some parts of it to be extremely irreverent and downright blasphemous although I've always found the relationship between Judas and Jesus as depicted in straightforward (no pun intended) accounts of the passion play as having some subtext going on. Even in Jesus Christ Superstar, there seems to be a thread of jealousy on Judas's part that Jesus is spending more time with Mary Magdalene than the apostles. Of course, if as some scholars suggest, Jesus and Mary Magdalene were actually married, this would make Judas the third leg in an unrequited love triangle. What McNally has done has made (in the words of Joss Whedon) "the subtext rapidly text." If you can ignore the homosexual content (both implicit and explicit), the story still comes across and there is a sense of spirituality that pervades the text of the play. I would like to have seen the original New York production, just to say I saw it. McNally makes no attempt to disguise the homoeroticism between characters and has the all-male cast play both male and female roles throughout (with the exception of the actors playing Judas and Joshua/Jesus). Don't forget that even in Shakespeare's time, it was forbidden for women to act onstage so all of Shakespeare's heroines were originally played by men. Another interesting sidenote is how many actors in the original NY cast (Anson Mount played Joshua, Josh Lucas played Judas, Michael Hall of Six Feet Under and Ken Leung were apostles), have gone on to bigger and better things. Obviously no one is holding having performed in this play against them. It bothers me that some individuals have written a review of this play without having either seen a production of it or took the time to read the play itself. One thing I've find useful is to keep an open mind. Don't dwell on the gayness of the play. The humanity of Joshua/Jesus and his disciples is what comes through in the long run.

Though unconventional and challenging, this play is the work of a true Christan: that is, of a person who's understood the meaning of Jesus Christ teaching of Love and Charity. Christ came for all of us, Christ is Love, and all Love is blessed in Him . Christ-and God- doesn't hate anyone, not even racist anti-gay bigots, for whoie souls He also prays-together with the blessed Matthew Shephard.

I am a big (ok, huge) fan of Chad Allen's and he just finished a run of Corpus Christi in Los Angeles. I live on the East Coast so couldn't make the performance, so to see what I missed I decided to purchase a copy of the script. I was very impressed at the way the script handled the controversial subject. The notion of a Christ-like character who happens to be gay is shocking to some sacrilegious to others to me it was simply the next step in bringing Christ to life. Before you condemn the play, or even criticize it try reading it with an open mind.

I would like to start by saying I have not read this but I have just seen the play performed during the Edinburgh Festival.

This is not a shocking play it is a tender and moving depiction of the bible. Jesus/Joshua is shown to love all, Man and Woman, he is shown as a guiding force and one who is respected by his friends. Jesus is shown in the way that he should be shown as one who forgives and accepts that people are different, he is never shown as being only gay just a man who can love and accept all(correct me if I am wrong not having read the text)

This is not a play that should be shunned by the church it is one that should be embraced by it as it stands up for the true Christian meaning, we should love and respect ALL and most importantly forgive.

I only wish that some of the people who react badly to this play would atleast read or go and see it . It is then and ONLY then that I will listen to anything they have to say about it. A review can not and should not be given unless the author of that review has knowledge of what he/she is writing.

So in short if you want to see a well crafted take on "The greatest story ever told" go and see this play.

If you want to be shocked by a gay Jesus this is not the play for you.

George Cameron (real name)

Terrence McNally is an extremely gifted writer. I have seen two of his shows on Broadway this year. He has the ability to see past the minor issues of daily life and to examine the big picture of human existence.

In Corpus Christi he re-writes the passion of Christ from his own perspective. This perspective is that of a gay man growing up in 1950's Texas. There has been much controversy surrounding this play and the Manhattan Theatre Club's production of it. McNally has been vilified by much of the Christian right and many have even gone so far as to ban the production.

On its face however the story basically tracts and updates the biblical version of the Passion. The message of the play is that all men must love one another and we must continue to struggle to make the world a better place no matter what one's individual beliefs happen to be.

If one takes the time to step away from the controversy and to actually read the words what unfolds is a very moving and deeply Christian worldview. If we don't look closely at past events and hide our heads in the sand concerning the problems of society we have a tendency to repeat the mistakes of the past. This is perhaps the greatest sin.

For those reviews who called this blasphemous and inaccurate obviously missed the idea. This was never supposed to be blasphemous and most of all it was never supposed to be accurate. No where does any document ever hint at Jesus being gay. It was a different way of presenting the ideas that Jesus tried to teach. Corpus Christi comes close to presenting its ideas but very minimally pulls it off.

The play starts of wonderfully and is incredibly well written with strong symbolism. It is when Jesus realizes his purpose in life and begins to teach that the writing begins to lose its power and effect. What starts off as an abstract idea and is played/written abstractly slowly turns too real and close to the actual events written in the Bible. It's because of this realness that the play loses it's wonder. McNally started of "recreating" the birth and teenage years of Christ and then puts it into its actual context giving the play an odd feel. People remember plays for a strong start and a strong finish, Corpus Christi starts off incredibly strong and has great potential, but the lackluster ending ruins what the play attempts to achieve, which is to have the audience connect and feel Christ's suffering and persecution of his ideas and his love for his disciples.

Other than that, the play is wonderful and gives us two great characters for actors to play in Judas and Jesus. As a gay man, I loved the scene in which showed Jesus blessing the gay marriage, totally relevant in today's culture.

This play is a wonderful piece of literature. There is nothing wrong with it-- at all.

The one thing people have to learn, or get through their heads, is that this is ONLY A PLAY! It's not real. It's a story. Just like the movies that you support or rave about.

As for other things certain reviewers made about this: Jesus was not sinless. He was created in the image and likeness of man, so therefore, he wouldn't be sinless. And, as for the possibility of Jesus' sexual orientation, him being gay is probable. Many passages in the Gospels hint at this.

Also, perhaps you religious zealots and homophobes have heard about the possibility of a marriage between Jesus and Mary Magdalen? Well, the first thing you should've caught was that she was the first one to visit his tomb-- a sign that they were married.

But back to the play.

In short, those of you who point to this book as being blasphemous should just go wake up. It's a book, you morons. Read it because it has nothing to do with the real world.

So go bang your Bibles some more, because I'm going to read this once more.