Amazon.com: Cosmopolitans: W. Somerset Maugham: Books

Buy Used
Used - Acceptable See details
$8.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Cosmopolitans
  
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Cosmopolitans [Hardcover]

W. Somerset Maugham (Author)
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Unknown Binding --  

Book Description

1936
The Sun Dial Press. 1936. 272 pages. 53/4' BY 73/4". Black boards with green printing on spine.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 272 pages
  • Publisher: Doubleday, Doran; 1st edition (1936)
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B00085RHRQ
  • Product Dimensions: 8 x 5.6 x 1.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #4,482,189 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

1 Review
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
5.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Maugham + very short stories = very great entertainment, July 17, 2011
This review is from: Cosmopolitans (Hardcover)
W. Somerset Maugham

Cosmopolitans
Very Short Stories*

Preface
Raw Material [1923, as ''The Imposters'']
Mayhew [1923]
German Harry [1924]
The Happy Man [1924]
The Dream [1924]
In a Strange Land [1924]
The Luncheon* [1924]
Salvatore [1924, as ''Salvatore the Fisherman'']
Home [1924, as ''Home from the Sea'']
Mr. Know-All [1925]
The Escape [1925, as ''The Widow's Might'']
A Friend in Need [1925, as ''The Man Who Wouldn't Hurt a Fly'']
The Portrait of a Gentleman [1925, as ''The Code of a Gentleman'']
The End of the Flight [1926]
The Judgement Seat [never published in magazine***]
The Ant and the Grasshopper [1924]
French Joe [1926, as ''Another Man Without a Country'']
The Man with the Scar [1925]
The Poet [1925, as ''The Great Man'']
Louise [1925, as ''The Most Selfish Woman I Ever Knew'']
The Closed Shop [1926]
The Promise [1925, as ''An Honest Woman'']
A String of Beads [1927, as ''Pearls'']
The Bum [1929, as ''A Derelict'']
Straight Flush [1929]
The Verger [1929, as ''The Man Who Made His Mark'']
The Wash Tub [1929, as ''In Hiding'']
The Social Sense [1929, as ''The Extraordinary Sex'']
The Four Dutchmen [1928]

Heinemann, Hardback, 1938.
12mo. xiii, 302 pp. The Collected edition. Original Preface, 1936 [vii-xiii].

First published by Doubleday Doran in 1936.
First published by Heinemann in The Collected edition in 1938.

* In the square brackets: the year of the first publication in a magazine and the alternative title, if any.

** Significantly rewritten version of Cousin Amy which was first published in a magazine in 1908 but had to wait more than 60 years to appear in book form: ''Seventeen Lost Stories'' (1969).

*** But it was published in pamphlet form in 1934.

=============================================

The first thing about ''Cosmopolitans'' by Somerset Maugham that must be stressed firmly is that this short story collection is quite different than all others he ever published. Hence any comparisons between them are, to put it mildly, ridiculous. I wonder why this escapes some biographers of Maugham, most notably Jeffrey Meyers who insists on such comparison in his somewhat pathetic attempt ''Somerset Maugham: A Life'' (2004).

Let's look at the numbers first: all previous short story collections by Maugham, published between 1920 and 1933, contained no more than 6 stories each (except Ashenden of course; but its 16 chapters were later merged into six short stories anyway). ''Cosmopolitans'' contains exactly 29 pieces and has the subtitle ''Very Short Stories''. It is therefore quite obvious that these short stories are expected to be much shorter and much less complex in terms of both plot and character development than Maugham's previous works in the genre. Indeed, they are. Therefore any comparisons of that sort are, to put it very mildly, preposterous. Mr. Meyers also tells us that there is only one outstanding story in this collection and that is ''Mr. Know-All''. This too is a perfect nonsense.

The name of the collection comes, of course, from the famous magazine ''Cosmopolitan'' in which all these short stories save one appeared between 1923 and 1929. Indeed, they were written on a commission from that magazine whose editor, Ray Long, happened to read Maugham's travel book ''On A Chinese Screen'' (1922) and thinking that some of the 58 short sketches included in it might well serve as short stories commissioned a dozen or so new ones to Maugham. Later most of these very short stories were revised a great deal, acquired new titles and were published in a single volume by Doubleday in 1936. To this book Maugham wrote one of his most charming prefaces, extremely amusing to read and containing a lot of serious thoughts about the art of fiction. He states that the stories for Cosmopolitan were to be short enough to be printed on two opposite pages of the magazine and leave enough space for an illustration. Maugham describes his difficulties to compress all he had to say in so limited a space and points out that these stories, naturally, are anecdotes. But I couldn't say it better than he did:

''My difficulty was to compress what I had to tell into a number of words which must not be exceeded and yet leave the reader with the impression that I had told all there was to tell. It was this that made the enterprise amusing. It was also salutary. I could not afford to waste a word. I had to be succinct. I was surprised to find how many adverbs and adjectives I could leave out without any harm to the matter or the manner. One often writes needless words because they give the phrase a better ring. It was very good practice to try to get balance into a sentence without using a word that was not necessary to the sense.''

''The matter of course had to be chosen with discretion; it would have been futile to take a theme that demanded elaborate development; and I have a natural predilection for completeness, so that even in the little space at my disposal I wanted my story to have a beginning, a middle and an end. I do not for my own part much care for the shapeless story.''

''The anecdote is the basis of fiction. The restlessness of writers forces upon fiction from time to time forms that are foreign to it, but when it has been oppressed for a period by obscurity, propaganda or affectation, it reverts, and returns inevitably to the anecdote.''

After that Maugham makes a very shrewd remark about novels in general that is pretty much true for all fiction:

''The novel may stimulate you to think. It may satisfy your aesthetic sense. It may arouse your moral emotions. But if it does not entertain you it is a bad novel. It is merely laziness that induces people to go to novels for instruction on subjects that are the province of experts. There is no short road to knowledge and you will only waste your time if you seek it in a work of fiction.''

Maugham's aim with these very short stories was to amuse and to entertain. Nothing more. To my mind he succeeds completely. And gives much more besides as well.

The most amazing thing about all short stories in this collection is that even in this very limited space Maugham manages to achieve a perfect structure. His stories always have ''a beginning, a middle and an end'' although the ''cosmopolitans'' (by design!) are much shorter than his other stories and do not make any pretensions for plot plausibility or character complexity. For my own part, I can hardly imagine something more enjoyable to read than these quite charming little pieces. Most of them are simply hilarious and I always laugh my head off while reading them, ''Mr. Know-All'', ''The Ant and the Grasshopper'', ''The Poet'' and ''The Wash Tub'' being the perfect examples. The short story ''Louise'', on the other hand, is a very apt example of something that is both hilarious and, if you look at it under a slightly different angle, quite serious at the same time; it is also one of the most cynical works Maugham ever wrote and one that can always be counted to win him more accusations of misogyny. Personally I consider it a masterpiece.

The emotional range of Maugham's writing is as exceptional here as it is everywhere else in his works; only the different themes are explored in different stories because of the limited space. Among the many wonderful experiences while reading ''Cosmopolitans'' you can touch for a moment the pure goodness (''Salvatore''), be enchanted by some extremely honest women (''The Promise'' and ''The Social Sense''; misogyny be damned!), convince yourself that the illiteracy is not something so bad after all (''The Verger''), be shocked by how unexpected a thing somebody could do (''A Friend in Need'') or be deeply moved by the heart-rending story of ''The Bum''. I have not the slightest hesitation to put all these stories in an imaginary volume of mine called ''The Best Short Stories of W. Somerset Maugham''. Indeed, the first lines of ''A Friend in Need'' may very well serve as an introduction to Maugham's complete works:

''For thirty years now I have been studying my fellow-men. I do not know very much about them. I should certainly hesitate to engage a servant on his face, and yet I suppose it is on the face that for the most part we judge the persons we meet. We draw our conclusions from the shape of the jaw, the look in the eyes, the contour of the mouth. I wonder if we are more often right than wrong. Why novels and plays are so often untrue to life is because their authors, perhaps of necessity, make their characters all of a piece. They cannot afford to make them self-contradictory, for then they become incomprehensible, and yet self-contradictory is what most of us are. We are a haphazard bundle of inconsistent qualities. In books on logic they will tell you that it is absurd to say that yellow is tubular or gratitude heavier than air; but in that mixture of incongruities that makes up the self yellow may very well be a horse and cart and gratitude the middle of the week. I shrug my shoulders when people tell me that their first impressions of a person are always right. I think they must have small insight or great vanity. For my own part I find that the longer I know people the more they puzzled me: my oldest friends are just these of whom I can say that I don't know the first thing about them.''

Of course, as every extremely productive writer, Maugham is not always at his best (only the mediocre is, as he once said). His finest achievements in the genre were generally his much longer and much more complex short stories where he had much greater chances to explore the human nature and all its... Read more ›
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category