Could you please provide details as to why she is either demonic or has a viper's tongue. Or are you simply one of the mob who has to yell something absurd just to please the mob around you ( after all they could turn on you otherwise )?
Amazing, Ann is playing games and the liberals are too obsessed to see it. One has to distinguish between sarcasm, intentional exaggerations (hyperbole), comedic language to make a point etc. If she says Ted Kennedy did not know how to swim, she might mean, he left the scene of the accident, did not report it, went to his hotel room and did not contact anyone until the following day, why? Too drunk? Thinking up a good story? I do not know, but he went on to be reelected to the senate until he died, by whom? Democrats. Everyone knows what O.J. did except the 12 jurors. Everyone knows what Kennedy did except the Massachusetts voters. Liberals would say that Ann is uninformed because Ted did know how to swim.
sd, of course you are right. Whenever Liberals accuse Conservatives of doing something bad, you can almost always be assured that they are guilty of what they are accusing Conservatives of doing. I've always considered Janene Garofalo and Rosie O'Donnell to be lovable little angels whose "constructive criticism" of we Conservatives is only meant to help us see the error of our ways.
ME, please amend your comment. The 12 O.J. jurors KNEW he did do it. For sarcasm, exaggeration and comedic language to work (and to sell books) it must be based on the truth. Democrats can't handle the truth, thus we get comments like "Coulter is demonic with a viper's tongue". Translation: "Oh, Ann's new book hurts, so I'll strike back with the first thing that comes to my mind". Usually, the first thing that comes to a Liberal's mind is "projection".
I am going to stop following this thread so I don't have to have your juvenile talk radio level missives clog my inbox but I figured I would come back for one last time to sort your trash into the proper bins.
Please read this comment before Amazon takes the opportunity to delete it.
I accused Amazon of allowing pornographic comments to ride, while at the same time, deleting conservative comments.
Two of my conservative comments above were deleted.
I thought the big brother types sitting in their computer chairs, (on their fat rear ends) and choosing which comments to allow and which comments to delete were a bunch of liberals and it turns out I was right!
You can argue all you want about liberalism and conservatism but I would encourage you to do some research on where this two-sided dialectic came from. Perhaps it is a control mechanism? If you get put in a right/left predetermined mind-set you are controlled by whoever controls the arguement and its options. Do I need to go Orwellian on ya'? There is a crazy read of a book that I am afraid few People have read that is called: 2+2=4 History with Eyes Open, by Nathan Patrick Henry that is worth a read. Even if you don't agree with everything he says you will still enjoy the ebook and have a lot to start thinking about.