The Critics of Keynesian Economics (LvMI) and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy Used
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Former Library book. Shows some signs of wear, and may have some markings on the inside. Find out why millions of customers rave about Better World Books. Experience the best customer care and a 100% satisfaction guarantee.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Critics of Keynesian Economics Hardcover – 1960

See all 17 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
Hardcover, 1960

Holiday Deals in Books
Holiday Deals in Books
Find deals for every reader in the Holiday Deals in Books store, featuring savings of up to 50% on cookbooks, children's books, literature & fiction, and more.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 427 pages
  • Publisher: D. Van Nostrand; First Edition edition (1960)
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B0000CKUDV
  • Product Dimensions: 8.4 x 5.9 x 1.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,959,010 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

12 of 12 people found the following review helpful By D. W. MacKenzie on August 18, 2008
Format: Paperback
Hazlitt edited this 1960 volume of early reactions to Keynes at a time when most economists were devout Keynesians. For the most part this book is a colleting of writings by Keynes' earliest critics. It also includes a chapter by JB Say. There are several things to note about this book. It is interesting for the largely purposes of History of Economic Thought. The Keynesian paradigm that prevailed in 1960 is now stone dead. Nobody believes in a stable Philips curve anymore. The Modigliani chapter is part of that era when the old Keynesian paradigm was still taken seriously.

Most of the authors go further back to Keynes himself. Mises and Hayek are always interesting to read, and Keynes deserved to be critiqued at that time. But Keynes' book is rarely read by economists nowadays. Though many economists still refer to themselves as Keynesians, few of them know anything about Keynes' own ideas. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money is a dead horse, let it rest.

It seems odd that this volume contains not even one thing written by Milton Friedman. Yes, I know, we Austrians have some disagreements with Friedman, but we have disagreements with Frank Knight too, and Hazlitt included a Knight chapter. Of course, Friedman did not rise to real prominence until after this book came out. But the more recent edition of this book might have included something from Friedman, perhaps his paper on long and variable lags. It would be nice to see something on Political Business cycles too.

In any case, the arguments of this book do not apply all that directly to the New Keynesian paradigm, as developed by Stiglitz, Akerlof, Mankiw and others. So you should read it while remembering the context in which it was edited. This is a good book for those who want to understand more about the early debate over Keynesian economics. Look elsewhere for material on the current debate in macroeconomics.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful By S. Metzeler on June 21, 2007
Format: Paperback
This simply cannot be over-stated: this book is fundamental for all students of economics. It debunks Keynes and show just how completely absurd his thinking is, often bordering on mysticism and magic ("Inflation can turn stones into break").

The previous review that claims that the critics of Keynes didn't understand his mathematical model would be funny if it wasn't so sad to imagine anyone would be so much in love with an absurd theory as to look for desperate ways to defend it.

Among the critics, there are some of the best economists of the 20th century, including Nobel Price winner Friedrich von Hayek, hardly people who would find it challenging to understand Keynes' math.

Besides, this just proves another point: if an economic theory cannot be put into clear and concise words, the best math in the world won't save it. Nonsense is still nonsense even when it tries to hide in complex formulas. Of course math cannot contradict logic and Keynes theories were extremely illogical, which is exactly what this book proves beyond any doubt.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
6 of 28 people found the following review helpful By Michael Emmett Brady on April 21, 2006
Format: Paperback
Every scientist has a model which is used to show or demonstrate how the main variables that had previously been defined and discussed in the earlier stage of theory construction interact.The scientist applies the theory through the use of the model.A critic of a theory must demonstrate that the model used by the scientist is inadequate or inferior because he has omitted a relevant variable or factor or because he has misspecified the model to include variables or factors which are not relevant.A critic can also show that errors or mistakes have been made that render the model inappropriate for use until the model has been corrected.Hazlitt,the editor of this volume of collected essays,and the essay contributors have absolutely no idea of what the formal,mathematical model that Keynes constructed in the General Theory(1936)is or where in the GT it can be located.All the criticisms are based only on particular obiter dicta made by Keynes in supplementary literary comments.In May of 1935,Keynes told Dennis Robertson that his model,The Employment Function, was not in the first 17 chapters of the GT.In spite of this,Robertson continued to claim that Keynes's model was contained in pp.24-30(chapter 3 of the GT).Later economists claimed that his model was located in footnote 2 on pp.55-56 of the GT or on p.44.Any reader of the GT can easily locate the chapter in which Keynes's model appears.Chapter 20 of the GT is called "The Employment Function".Keynes analyzes the output and labor markets in this chapter.In chapter 21 he adds the money market.In the appendix to chapter 19,after stating the major result of the GT on pp.Read more ›
22 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?