Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Koselleck's Brilliant Analysis of our Modern World, December 31, 2008
This review is from: Critique and Crises: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought) (Paperback)
This book was my introduction to Koselleck, and let me just say right off the bat, rarely does someone write such a tight case than this man. To compare to someone in this regard, Foucault comes to mind, except Foucault is more lively. Koselleck is dry, but this does, in no way, take away from how fascinating this book is.
Slight "Spoiler" of Koselleck's wonderfully tight case to follow.
The book does a lot more than simply what the other reviewer has mentioned. In a brief summary, this book goes something like: Koselleck brings us from the Absolutist State, to the beginning stages of the Enlightenment thinkers, to the secretive Illuminati and Freemasons and their development of critiquing the Prince or Absolutist State, to the more outright critiquing of the State (by Rousseau, Voltaire, etc) and eventually the explosion or crisis that began with the French Revolution.
In general anyone interested in anyone of these above things would truly appreciate this book. Also, Koselleck does not end the story where I have, as in his title he writes "Pathogenesis", in other words he hints to the fact that the very ideals of the Enlightenment have ended in a kind of pathological state. In this sense, anyone interested in pathological or of course "crisis" studies would love this book--and I am not just talking to the historically minded.
This book is simply a brilliant analysis of not only our modern/contemporary world, but our modern/contemporary psyches.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Crisis: acceptance of an absolute moral responsibility for action, December 17, 2008
This was required reading for a graduate course in the history of the French Revolution. In Reinhart Kosseleck's book Critique and Crisis, he argued that the word "crisis," whose origin was Greek, has gone through four interpretative derivations. The fourth derivation signified the concept of crisis as an essential means of interpreting historical time. "The use of `crisis' as an epochal concept pointing to an exceptionally rare, if not unique, transition period, has expanded most dramatically since the last third of the eighteenth century." Kosseleck observed that Paine used the word crisis to describe "acceptance of an absolute moral responsibility for action." On the other hand, "In Burke's perspective, crisis as a revolutionary concept of redemption becomes an analytical category for understanding concrete historical situations." Kosseleck thought that both men used the term in its proper form, but feared that mass media has cheapened its meaning and intent. Thus, he warned present day scholars to carefully use the term "crisis."
Recommended reading for anyone interested in political philosophy, enlightenment history, and history of the French Revolution.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Crisis: acceptance of an absolute moral responsibility for action, December 17, 2008
This review is from: Critique and Crises: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought) (Paperback)
This was required reading for a graduate course in the history of the French Revolution. In Reinhart Kosseleck's book Critique and Crisis, he argued that the word "crisis," whose origin was Greek, has gone through four interpretative derivations. The fourth derivation signified the concept of crisis as an essential means of interpreting historical time. "The use of `crisis' as an epochal concept pointing to an exceptionally rare, if not unique, transition period, has expanded most dramatically since the last third of the eighteenth century." Kosseleck observed that Paine used the word crisis to describe "acceptance of an absolute moral responsibility for action." On the other hand, "In Burke's perspective, crisis as a revolutionary concept of redemption becomes an analytical category for understanding concrete historical situations." Kosseleck thought that both men used the term in its proper form, but feared that mass media has cheapened its meaning and intent. Thus, he warned present day scholars to carefully use the term "crisis."
Recommended reading for anyone interested in political philosophy, enlightenment history, and history of the French Revolution.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|