Customer Reviews


32 Reviews
5 star:
 (18)
4 star:
 (7)
3 star:
 (3)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch
The La Crosse WT-966B was a great purchase. It is better in appearance and easier to read than the less expensive model. Several reviewers have faulted La Crosse for implying that this model is stainless steel, and I agree that the advertising is perhaps a bit misleading. But anyone knows that a radio receiver can not be surrounded by metal, or it would require an...
Published on January 9, 2007 by Aaron Baker Cole

versus
20 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Accurate but not steel
I have this watch for a year now, it receives the radio signal when in continental US and stays accurate to less than a second (I compare it to another radio controlled watch, they show the same time within fraction of a second, and I can't detect any difference). The watch is plastic, and thin metal layer covering it wears off pretty quickly. The watch does not have any...
Published on June 1, 2005 by Vladimir Kushnir


‹ Previous | 1 2 3 4| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

20 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Accurate but not steel, June 1, 2005
By 
Vladimir Kushnir "vkus" (Darien, CT United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch (Kitchen)
I have this watch for a year now, it receives the radio signal when in continental US and stays accurate to less than a second (I compare it to another radio controlled watch, they show the same time within fraction of a second, and I can't detect any difference). The watch is plastic, and thin metal layer covering it wears off pretty quickly. The watch does not have any features - no light, no alarm, but look on a bright side of it: this is good for battery life!

My next watch is Casio G-Shock Atomic Solar Watch MTG900DA-8V -- not much more expensive but infinitely better -- hightly recoomend!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Newly revised price, but really lacking description, May 3, 2005
By 
M. Marsh "Mike" (San Diego, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch (Kitchen)
Imagine my surprise after paying 59.95 for a stainless steel watch, only to find that the watch is plastic and only the band is stainless steel. Now imagine that I go to amazon.com to leave a review and find that the description has been updated and the price reduced 42% on the day that I received the watch UPS.
NEGATIVES---
No specifications on water resistance to be found in the packaging. An LCD watch with no backlight. A silver plastic watch body.
---
Positive
It is a really accurate time piece. An ok stainless band.

Probably worth $29.99 for the geek factor for the atomic clock works.

Skip it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch, January 9, 2007
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch (Kitchen)
The La Crosse WT-966B was a great purchase. It is better in appearance and easier to read than the less expensive model. Several reviewers have faulted La Crosse for implying that this model is stainless steel, and I agree that the advertising is perhaps a bit misleading. But anyone knows that a radio receiver can not be surrounded by metal, or it would require an external antenna running up your sleeve, something we don't want. The WT-966B has a stainless steel band, and the plastic watch body is finished with a substance that matches the band exactly. It all appears to be made of stainless steel. I did require the services of a jeweler to remove two band segments so that the unit would fit my wrist, but this degree of assistance is not uncommon.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Greatest thing since sliced bread, September 4, 2005
By 
Johnny K. Young (Los Angeles, CA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch (Kitchen)
I have had this watch for about 4 years and I cannot imagine being without it. Knowing exactly what time it is the best feeling. I am spoiled by this technology. I get so many compliments on its design and while I do enjoy the design, the technology is what has me hooked. You cannot go wrong with this watch.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Best Watch for a small price* * * * *, August 18, 2005
This review is from: La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch (Kitchen)
This is a great watch. Mine is almost four (4) years old and going strong, except for a new battery every year or so. I've never had a battery last close to three years. The only problem is, the finish on the plastic case is now wearing thin. Other than the aforementioned, this is a great timepiece. It automatically changes to daylight savings time and back to standard time in whatever time zone you are in.
LaCrosse Technology produces and excellent servicable product.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Atomic Watch, March 22, 2006
This review is from: La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch (Kitchen)
Excellent product. Keeps time perfectly. The time zone change is very convenient for travelers and is easy to implement.

One suggeston: include a light for viewing in the dark.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars LaCrosse WT-966B Watch, October 23, 2005
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch (Kitchen)
Excellent product. Band adjustable (not too easily, however, but can be done) to fit virtually all wrists. Further "micro-adjustment" also possible in closing mechanism that seems not to be mentioned in the manual that comes with the watch.

So long as I am within 2,000 miles of Fort Collins, Colorado (for automatic time correction), it does just what I want -- precisely correct time, date and day of the week always available; automatically adjusts itself as needed between daylight and standard time and all that for a quite modest price as compared to other watches.

D. R. Oakley - Massachusetts
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Watch Evaluation, May 10, 2007
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
Nice watch at a good price, but the radio receiver should be more sensitive. Also it should be capable of rceiving the other time setting setting transmitters.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Good Product Could Be Better, November 10, 2006
By 
This review is from: La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch (Kitchen)
The La Crosse watch is a handsome watch. Advertised as "stainless steel," it is not. The band is stainless, but the watch's finish is an aluminum paint that scratches easily and soon becomes disfigured if the wearer is physically active as I am. The watch case should be stainless steel. The watch face could be illuminated for reading in the dark. Addition of these two features would make a much more attractive product.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Virtually worthless, August 19, 2006
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch (Kitchen)
I purchased this watch specifically for the automatic update feature as I travel regularly within the U.S. I've had it for a few months now and have traveled across all time zones and it has yet to update automatically even though the radio signal icon is visible on the watch and working. If it can't do the one thing I purchased it for, it's not worth anything to me.

I do have a request in to Lacrosse tech support so we'll see if an update is forthcoming.

Update: Apparently this watch is not designed to update automatically as you cross time zones so misunderstanding on my part. To my mind, without this function, this watch is not much better than any other watch.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 2 3 4| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

La Crosse Technology WT-966B Stainless Steel Atomic Watch
Out of stock
Add to wishlist