Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Warrior's Way, March 26, 2009
In Greek myth the jurisdiction over war is divided. Athena Nike, as governess over the arts, crafts, and sciences is in charge of victory as a corrallary to being in charge of strategy and statecraft. Ares is in charge of war in itself-he likes the fury of war for it's own sake. And while many historians, understandably prefer to study Athena Nike, this book is devoted to studying the ways of Ares.
It has been said that war is an extention of politics. That is in a sense true, in so far as the one who gives the orders for the commencement of hostilities is usually a politician and therefore inspired by political motives. However it is less true that people fight for politics. People fight for more important things like duty, honor, country, faith, friends, family, comrades-in-arms and so on. And if these things are "delusions" as cynics say, it might be pointed out that much of cynicism is itself a delusion and not the most pleasant of them.
The book gives an overview of the customs of warriors throughout history and the recuring themes. It shows how the culture of fighting men, the subtle(and not so subtle) ways in which they boast of their prowess and assert their right to be recognized as men-among-men is has much in common worldwide. It gives examples of such things as traditions, decorations, and what not, all designed to give the suspicion that people do to some degree like to fight. It shows how no matter how far apart cultures are in technology or customs, some things remain the same(this struck me in the Movie Zulu when the Zulus were singing their war songs and the Welsh were singing "Men of Harlech" in reply). Much of the points in the book of course I take for granted, have been a member of the "civilian" part of the culture of war sense the first time I read a war-story or played my first wargame. The book by the way sheds some light on this, telling about reenactors, wargamers and the like. Some would deplore the "culture of war" and say it should be removed. But it is part of life and not the worst part.
The disadvantage of the book from my point of view are twofold is that I desired cultural history and thus the authors personal opinions were an annoying distraction. Another disadvantage is that Crevald can be an annoying writter at times. One advantage it does have is it is lacking in cant. Crevald never states that he really, really hates war even though he makes a living off of it and writes about it with an obvious relish. In fact he gives a rather Pattonesque feeling which some might find irritating but is at least a change of pace. In any case his point is taken, that war has it's own culture and aspects of it cross through time and space.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting, but not one of his better books, February 26, 2009
This review is from: The Culture of War (Hardcover)
Van Creveld's book doesn't really present anything new but it makes for an interesting read. First you have to understand that he comes from the school of thought that war is part of, if not caused by, human nature. "It's culture, rooted as it is in human psychology, is largely impervious to change." And while the function of culture is to make men willingly face death, "it can do so only if it is understood not as a means to an end but an end in itself."
What makes the book interesting is his contention that the culture that surrounds war, from the way societies prepare for war, fight wars, commemorate war, and portray war in popular culture, is not only necessary to successfully win, but to keep it under control.
But I have to admit that he could have made his point in half the time. At times it seemed he was going for the word count and wandered from point to point. Wait 'till it comes out in paper or get it at the library -- it's not one of his best works.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Forgotten Part of War, July 22, 2009
This review is from: The Culture of War (Hardcover)
This book goes against the popular grain about war. So many today define war as a function of machines and CNN clips. They forget about that war is so much more than just what is on TV. It involves machines, people, and lost lives. The book really offers and old definition of war against this TV image that people today have totally forgotten. This book for sure will cause you to think. People will an interest in military affairs will like this book. People without that connection might get lost in the details but should read it anyway.
The book talks about what War is via multiple different ways. He uses a historical lenses set against different aspects of society to really understand war. Martin Van Creveld tries to explain how War has, and must have the human touch. He explains this as seen through its impact in recent wars, through art, through culture, roles, and etc... This method really will cause a person to say "oh yeah" that is true or that point is like this or that.
This book will teach you the human in the equation is all so important. He shapes things for good or for bad. The author uses historical examples to teach the point. This idea isn't new, but it is for some in today's world. They seek a technical explanation for war or they think man has evolved past war. I personally find that the most humorous. All a person needs to do is pick up a newspaper and see how our technology hasn't solved Iraq or anything else.
A lot of people today need to realize that message. So few have any contact with the military. However everyone is quick to send bombs here and there in hope it solves problems. Many times it only creates new problems.
The author goes one to explain why we need a military culture. The culture or human part is the critical part to national security. If a nation doesn't realize that today will reap the penalties tomorrow. A nation will either not be about to defend its nation or be to quick to unleash the dogs of war without any consideration to the costs.
This book has lots of facts and stories. The book gets long in parts. You need to read the whole book to get the impact. It is worth the work.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|