Qty:1
$48.95 + Free Shipping
In Stock. Sold by Bowlerstore

Other Sellers on Amazon
Add to Cart
$41.14
+ $11.99 shipping
Sold by: ADVENTURER'S BAG
Add to Cart
$41.14
+ $11.99 shipping
Sold by: EXPRESS IT
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

DV8 Double Tote Bowling Bag- Holds Shoes

1 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

List Price: $69.95
Price: $48.95 & FREE Shipping
You Save: $21.00 (30%)
Only 20 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by Bowlerstore. Gift-wrap available.
  • Enter your model number above to make sure this fits.
  • This DV8 Double Tote Bowling Bag holds shoes up to size 15
  • It also has a padded, adjustable shoulder strap
  • The back of the bag features a mesh pocket for accessories
3 new from $41.14
$48.95 & FREE Shipping Only 20 left in stock. Ships from and sold by Bowlerstore. Gift-wrap available.


Product Description

This DV8 Double Tote Bowling Bag holds shoes up to size 15. It also has a padded, adjustable shoulder strap. The back of the bag features a mesh pocket for accessories. 17"W x 12"D x 8.5"H Expandable shoe storage and accessory compartment Removable foam ball holder This bag will be great for all deviants!

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 5 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B006ZLRVJQ
  • Average Customer Review: 1.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #893,578 in Sports & Outdoors (See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors)
  • Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Customer Reviews

5 star
0%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
100%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By Cjhemp on November 20, 2013
Verified Purchase
Two 15lb balls fit nicely
Only shoes this bag will hold is toddler size
Spend the money and get a bigger bag if you want to put anything else other than the two balls in it
Quality of material is sub par. It feels like plastic almost
Comment 3 of 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse