| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Well worth reading......,
By lordhoot "lordhoot" (Anchorage, Alaska USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Dahlgren Affair: Terror and Conspiracy in the Civil War (Paperback)
This proves to be a pretty interesting conspiracy book which in some way, may related to our current problems with terrorist activites. Here, we have an alleged set of papers found on the body of Colonel Ulric Dahlgren who was leading one of the cavalry columns which was supposed to free the Union POWs in Richmond. The papers found states that Dahlgren and his men planned to mass murder the Confederate government and burn Richmond to the ground. These papers gave a pretext for the South to go ahead with their own plans to conduct terroristic actions against the North. Was the papers planted and forged? Its a story of truth, half-truths and lies. One of the central themes that the book covered was if these Dahlgren papers were real or fake. Duane Schultz (the author) believed them to be fake. I find logic in what he is saying and believed that faked papers were meant to arouse the Southern spirit which have been in doldrum and give pretext for deseperate actions in the north. Well written, nicely researched and well presented, the book proves to be informative and easy to read. Of course, you have keep an open mind as well.
13 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Well-written but one huge flaw,
This review is from: The Dahlgren Affair: Terror and Conspiracy in the Civil War (Hardcover)
This book is colorful, interesting, and full of vividly-drawn characters and events. This makes it all the more surprising--and disappointing--that the author errs so glaringly on one of the central tenets of the entire book. Perhaps in an attempt to provide a "fresh" approach to a subject covered by numerous other historians and writers in this and past generations, Mr. Schultz, through tortured logic, turns established and documented history on its ear. How? He claims that, rather than the infamous 1864 Kilpatrick-Dahlgren Raid being the terrorist attack it was-- with designs to burn Richmond to the ground and murder the entire Confederate cabinet--that it was merely an attempt to free Federal prisoners; the Confederates, Schultz claims, concocted the arson-murder scheme through (necessarily) forgery, lies, and conspiracy, then used these nefarious acts to launch a real campaign of terror--against the North. This huge gaffe, which gives only passing credence to the mountain of evidence that indicts Dahlgren, leaves the reader with a similar feeling to having watched an exciting movie for two hours, only to be let down by a horribly disappointing ending. Mr. Schultz may have gotten his villains right in his previous book about Quantrill and his raiders, but he gets them reversed here. A host of past and contemporary historians and writers from both Northern and Southern perspectives dealing with the same subject provide much more convincing evidence that Colonel Dahlgren, brave as he clearly was, was not framed, but through misplaced youthful zeal and misguided duty, came very close to orchestrating one of the greatest and most criminal massacres in American history. A much more credible contemporary account can be found in Stephen W. Sears' chapter on the Dahlgren raid in his recent book "Controversies and Commanders, Dispatches from the Army of the Potomac."
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
This book wasa big disappointment.,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Dahlgren Affair: Terror and Conspiracy in the Civil War (Hardcover)
This is a well-written but poorly-argued effort to concoct a conspiracy theory about certain events in the Civil War. It is uses few primary sources and not well. It seems a clumsy combination of Jones' book Eight Hours Before Richmond and Tidwell's April '65 with very little that is new. Far too many errors of fact make it a poor account of either the Kilpatrick Raid or the Confederate spy service. It wasted my time and money.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|