During a public lecture held in the Spring of 2008 at the City College of New York, eminent evolutionary geneticist Francisco J. Ayala castigated biochemist Michael J. Behe for his inane espousal of Intelligent Design creationism, asserting that, as a biochemist, Behe ought to know better. Ayala's criticism was not one replete with venom, but instead, tinged with sorrow and pity, while still accusing Behe of being derelict in his professional scientific duty by not recognizing the overwhelming scientific facts in support of modern evolutionary theory. That lecture was truly an excellent summary of the main points of Ayala's 2007 book, "Darwin's Gift To Science", which is still one of the very best summations of the evidence for evolution and a most effective condemnation of - what eminent philosopher of science Philip Kitcher has referred to as "dead science" and yours truly as "mendacious intellectual pornography" - Intelligent Design creationism. Ayala, a former Roman Catholic monk, has rendered in elegant, exquisite, prose a most valuable service by using clear, concise logic in explaining how and why biological evolution is valid science, while Intelligent Design creationism isn't. Ayala's is a compelling line of logic, which doesn't founder on the hidden shoals of religious fervor, making the best, most persuasive, case I have read lately explaining why science and religion can co-exist successfully.
Ayala's introductory chapters discuss the origins of both Intelligent Design and Darwin's theory of evolution via natural selection. In Chapter Two, Ayala presents Intelligent Design as seen originally by English theologian William Paley, presenting an excellent historical survey of its religious origins within the early Christian Church. In Chapter Three, not only does Ayala provide us with a concise summary of Darwin's research, beginning with the HMS Beagle voyage, he argues persuasively that what Darwin did with his theory of evolution was to offer proof that design could exist in nature without requiring the existence of a Designer, in short, "Design without a Designer". How? By demonstrating that by the process of natural selection, complex organic structures could emerge without recourse to some external, "divine" intervention.
The most important chapters (Chapters Four to Eight) in Ayala's book deal with the evidence for evolution and against Intelligent Design. Chapter Four is an especially lucid, quite persuasive, overview of Natural Selection, and how it has been confirmed, not only by ecological and paleobiological data, but especially, in recent years, by overwhelming evidence from genetics and molecular biology. Ayala also explains how natural selection has served as the "engine" responsible for organismal complexity, refining further his earlier point (Chapter Three) as to how there could be "Design without a Designer". Chapter Five is an admirable summary of the ample evidence for evolution, from embryonic development and the fossil record, to biogeography and genetics. Chapter Six summarizes human evolution, emphasizing recent molecular data that affirms the close kinship between humanity and our nearest living relatives, the chimpanzees. Chapter Seven emphasizes the importance of recent developments in molecular biology which merely affirm the fact of evolution, discussing the degree of similarity of macromolecules such as nucleotides, and how they have been used in constructing molecular phylogenies and estimating the "molecular clock" of evolutionary divergence between lineages. Chapter Eight makes especially short work of such ludicrous Intelligent Design concepts as "Irreducible Complexity", explaining, for example, how the evolution of the molluscan eye from primitive mollusks to the most complex, modern cephalopods like the octopus and squid, demonstrates that a complicated structure such as the eye, can arise independently in two lineages - cephalopods and vertebrates - as the product of natural selection, not by direct intervention by an "Intelligent Designer".
Almost as an afterthought, Ayala addresses how and why religion and science should be viewed as separate, equally valid, aspects of human intellectual thought. He summarizes and stresses how mainstream Christian religions have reconciled themselves to the ample weight of scientific evidence for biological evolution (Chapter Nine), citing the views of some prominent contemporary theologians. Finally, in the concluding chapter (Chapter Ten), Ayala discusses the empirical nature of science itself, using as the two key illustrative examples, Darwin's field research during the HMS Beagle voyage and Mendel's pea inheritance experiments.