Buy New

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
Buy Used
Used - Acceptable See details
$6.98 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Darwin's Nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the Intelligent Design Movement
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Darwin's Nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the Intelligent Design Movement [Paperback]

William A. Dembski (Editor), Rick Santorum (Foreword)
2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)

Price: $25.00 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Only 2 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).
Want it delivered Wednesday, February 1? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback $25.00  

Book Description

February 22, 2006
With the publication of Darwin on Trial in 1991, Cal Berkeley legal scholar Phillip Johnson became the leading figure in the intelligent design movement. Exposing and calling into question the philosophical foundations of Darwinism, Johnson led the charge against this largely unquestioned philosophy of materialistic reductionism and its purported basis in scientific research. This book reviews and celebrates the life and thought of Phillip Johnson and the movement for which he has served as chief architect. Editor William A. Dembski presents eighteen essays by those who have known and worked with Johnson for more than a decade. They provide personal and in-depth insight into the man, his convictions and his leadership of the intellectual movement that called into question the hegemony of Darwinian theory. Contributors include Stephen Meyer Michael Behe Jay Wesley Richards Thomas Woodward Francis Beckwith Timothy Standish David Berlinski Michael Ruse David Keller Jonathan Wells Scott Minnich Nancy Pearcey Jay Budziszewski Marcus Ross Paul Nelson Henry Schaefer III Wesley Allen Walter Bradley Phillip E. Johnson

Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this book with The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism $10.95

Darwin's Nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the Intelligent Design Movement + The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism
  • This item: Darwin's Nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the Intelligent Design Movement

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details

  • The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details



Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

This Festschrift from friends—and a couple of friendly critics—honors Phillip Johnson, the Berkeley law professor whose 1991 publication Darwin on Trial and later books helped intelligent design emerge as a highly visible, and highly controversial, alternative to Darwinism. While it may be premature to hail Johnson as "Darwin's Nemesis," these essays reveal him as an influential strategist and mentor within the ID movement. Contributors to the 2004 symposium that spawned this collection include leading ID advocates Michael Behe, Stephen Meyer, Jonathan Wells and Scott Minnich, as well as Darwin defender Michael Ruse, who has engaged Johnson in debate. Other contributors address cultural and political questions beyond evolution itself, such as Francis Beckwith's timely review of legal controversies over ID in the classroom, J. Budziszewski's discussion of naturalism and the Natural Law tradition and editor William Dembski's commentary on the professional—and often personal—"backlash" against ID advocates. Readers who are familiar with the basics of ID and curious about the movement's development and inner workings will find much of interest, although for an account of the most recent and current controversies over ID, they will need to consult other sources. (Apr.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Review

"These essays reveal [Johnson} as an influential strategist and mentor within the ID movement" -- —Publisher's Weekly, February 13, 2006

Product Details

  • Paperback: 357 pages
  • Publisher: IVP Academic (February 22, 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0830828362
  • ISBN-13: 978-0830828364
  • Product Dimensions: 8.8 x 5.9 x 1.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,359,861 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

A mathematician and philosopher, William A. Dembski is Research Professor in Philosophy at Southwestern Seminary in Ft. Worth, where he directs its Center for Cultural Engagement. He is also a senior fellow with Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture in Seattle. Previously he was the Carl F. H. Henry Professor of Theology and Science at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, where he founded its Center for Theology and Science. Before that he was Associate Research Professor in the Conceptual Foundations of Science at Baylor University, where he headed the first intelligent design think-tank at a major research university: The Michael Polanyi Center.

Dr. Dembski has taught at Northwestern University, the University of Notre Dame, and the University of Dallas. He has done postdoctoral work in mathematics at MIT, in physics at the University of Chicago, and in computer science at Princeton University. A graduate of the University of Illinois at Chicago where he earned a B.A. in psychology, an M.S. in statistics, and a Ph.D. in philosophy, he also received a doctorate in mathematics from the University of Chicago in 1988 and a master of divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary in 1996. He has held National Science Foundation graduate and postdoctoral fellowships.

Dr. Dembski has published articles in mathematics, engineering, philosophy, and theology journals and is the author/editor of more than a dozen books. In The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities (Cambridge University Press, 1998), he examines the design argument in a post-Darwinian context and analyzes the connections linking chance, probability, and intelligent causation. The sequel to The Design Inference appeared with Rowman & Littlefield in 2002 and critiques Darwinian and other naturalistic accounts of evolution. It is titled No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Dr. Dembski has edited several influential anthologies, including Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing (ISI, 2004) and Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA (Cambridge University Press, 2004, co-edited with Michael Ruse). His newest book, The End of Christianity, differs markedly from his others, attempting to understand how the Fall of humanity can be real in light of modern science.

As interest in intelligent design has grown in the wider culture, Dr. Dembski has assumed the role of public intellectual. In addition to lecturing around the world at colleges and universities, he is frequently interviewed on the radio and television. His work has been cited in numerous newspaper and magazine articles, including three front page stories in the New York Times as well as the August 15, 2005 Time magazine cover story on intelligent design. He has appeared on the BBC, NPR (Diane Rehm, etc.), PBS (Inside the Law with Jack Ford; Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson), CSPAN2, CNN, Fox News, ABC Nightline, and the Daily Show with Jon Stewart.

[Photo by Laszlo Bencze]

 

Customer Reviews

11 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (5)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.5 out of 5 stars (11 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

65 of 105 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars It must have hit a nerve, September 14, 2006
By 
This review is from: Darwin's Nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the Intelligent Design Movement (Paperback)
I am shocked by the vial hate-speech and mindless ad hominem attacks in the "reviews" printed below. They demonstrate just the kind of vicious closed-minded nonsense that ID proponents seek to dispel. To quote one extreme example (you can read it in context in John Kwok's "review" below): "I find the notion of a Festschrift published in honor of Professor Johnson as absurd as a group of Neo-Nazis publishing one to commemorate Adolf Hitler and his hate-filled book "Mein Kampf" (I find this an apt comparison since Johnson and quite a few of his supporters have an ideological world view that is remarkably close to the likes of Adolf Hitler and Osama bin Laden.)."

Well, to quote Adolf Hitler, whom this reviewer seems to have some familiarity with, "All propaganda must be popular and its intellectual level must be adjusted to the most limited intelligence among those it is addressed to. Consequently, the greater the mass it is intended to reach, the lower its purely intellectual level will have to be." Several of these reviews marvelously illustrate this principle and shame on them for that. And good on the authors of Darwin's Nemesis, both advocates and opponents of ID, who seek a more reasoned approach.

As far as this book is concerned, it must have hit a raw nerve. One has to wonder what irrational opponents of Johnson and his thinking are so sensitive about. If Darwinism really does all that it claims, then it will survive if it is the fittest theory; if not, extinction is inevitable. Whatever happens, there is no place in a civilized society for the kind of hate-speech that a few reviewers clearly wish to substitute for rational arguments. Most appear to do this because they have not actually read the book, but simply hate Phillip Johnson. Buy the book, read it and make up your own mind. The irrational hatred of others is not a good basis for making any judgments in life.

(By way of full disclosure, I authored one of the chapters in Darwin's Nemesis. No, it is not a glowing tribute in support of ID. Yes, I do think that Phillip Johnson and those who disagree with him have a right to make their arguments in a way that allows others to rationally evaluate them. No, just in case there is any confusion about this, I don't support a world-view that in any way resembles that of Adolf Hitler and Osama bin Laden.)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


31 of 51 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars A Collection of Articles in Favor of Intelligent Design, October 2, 2006
By 
LEON L CZIKOWSKY (Harrisburg, Pa USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Darwin's Nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the Intelligent Design Movement (Paperback)
The book itself is a good resource for readers who wish to learn more about the works of Phillip Johnson, a leader of the Intelligent Design theories/(facts according to his supporters). It is a one sided defense of Johnson and tears down Darwin. Granted, Darwin made lots of mistakes, but Darwin was the first word, not the most recent, researcher into evolution. One writer insists the world is 10,000 years old. Some writers refute the existence of genetic mutations, or that any mutated species could survive. I know of the research into genetic mutations of species that following nuclear blasts and I believe that genes can indeed mutate and find it sad we have to debate even this level of science. But, indeed, this is the core of this debate.

I note one writer who argues how terrible it is that there are those who believe that since religion is not testable truth that it can not be taught as truth in schools. Yes, that is why your truth has to be faith, not taught in public schools as truth. Students are of different faiths, and it is up to their faiths to teach them faith. It is the role of schools to teach testable truth. That's the way it is supposed to be. Sorry.

The book is a good resource. Even those who disagree with these views can learn from it and allow the debates on this to continue.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Worth reading even if not totally convincing, December 21, 2010
This review is from: Darwin's Nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the Intelligent Design Movement (Paperback)
I have followed Johnson's work for a while, and the striking thing is how Darwinists not only believe in naturalistic evolution (which may be a supportable position), but also take the position that the beliefs of those who disagree are non-scientific and therefore not worthy to even be debated scientifically. That is, from the outset they define the terms of the debate in such a way that they win no matter what, because they define the opposing viewpoint in a way that it can't possibly win, by definiton.

This is dishonest and Johnson does well in pointing this out. Common sense would seem to dictate that the question of the origin of any physical, tangible, empirical artifact must necessarily be a question that is answerable by science, logic, or common sense as opposed to philosophy or religion. If you dug up a strange object, or found a monolith on the moon, or discovered an odd signal from outer space, in each instance the question of whether the artifact was intelligently designed would necessarily be a scientifc one and not a religious one... and that would be the case regardless of what the answer turned out to be. It would seem that this must be the case for any conceivable physical artifact. The fact that an artifact is a PHYSICAL artifact means that the question of whether it was intelligently designed must be a SCIENTIFIC question.

And yet, many Darwinists seem to be claiming that life on Earth is the one physical artifact that is an exception to this common sense rule. Any investigation into whether it was intelligently designed or not is inherently non-scientific, according to them. So, why is this? Why is life on Earth an exception to the rule? Why shouldn't the question of whether life was intelligently designed or not be discussed in a science class, when everyone would agree that this same question could be discussed in such a class in the case of any other physical object? Isn't life on Earth a physical object like all the rest? It is indeed, and it's also the most complex of all known physical objects, which should make an inference of intelligent design certainly within the realm of scientific inquiry.

Whether evolution is true I don't know, but Johnson does a good job of poking holes in certain logical fallacies that naturalists seem to place at the center of their arguments.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews









Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
First Sentence:
I first met Philip Johnson at a small Greek restaurant on Free School Lane next to the Old Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
universal common ancestry, organismal form, projection themes, complex specified information, design creationism, flagellar genes, telligent design, teleological positions, new cell types, stigma word, naturalistic evolution, new body plans, specified complexity, theistic evolutionists, design theorists, adaptive complexity, mathematical chaos, animal body plans, methodological naturalism, design hypothesis, intermediate sequences
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Phillip Johnson, New York, Phil Johnson, Cambridge University Press, Richard Dawkins, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Stephen Jay Gould, Michael Ruse, University of California, Conway Morris, National Academy of Sciences, United States, University of Chicago, Bill Dembski, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Black Box, Jonathan Wells, Scientific American, Supreme Court, Kenneth Miller, Michigan State University Press, San Francisco, Academic Press, California Board of Education
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:




What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums





Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject