Where will the water come from to sustain the great desert cities of Las Vegas, Los Angeles, and Phoenix? In a provocative exploration of the past, present, and future of water in the West, James Lawrence Powell begins at Lake Powell, the vast reservoir that has become an emblem of this story. At present, Lake Powell is less than half full. Bathtub rings ten stories tall encircle its blue water; boat ramps and marinas lie stranded and useless. To refill it would require surplus water--but there is no surplus: burgeoning populations and thirsty crops consume every drop of the Colorado River. Add to this picture the looming effects of global warming and drought, and the scenario becomes bleaker still. Dead Pool, featuring rarely seen historical photographs, explains why America built the dam that made Lake Powell and others like it and then allowed its citizens to become dependent on their benefits, which were always temporary. Writing for a wide audience, Powell shows us exactly why an urgent threat during the first half of the twenty-first century will come not from the rising of the seas but from the falling of the reservoirs.
| |||||||||||||||
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
From Booklist
For some, “dead pool” is a betting game involving the death of celebrities. What Powell is referring to is the emptying of the arid West’s precious reservoirs, prime among them Lake Powell, which was created when the Colorado River was dammed in 1963, submerging Glen Canyon, one of the planet’s most spectacular places. The reservoir was a recreational haven until 2005, when it fell to one-third of its capacity. Given the enormous water needs of our desert metropolises—Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Phoenix—this is a catastrophe in the making. Powell presents a scientifically grounded inquiry into the grievous failure of the West’s megadams, which for all their colossal expense and engineering marvels wreak environmental havoc now exacerbated by global warming. For all its detail, this is an involving exposé as Powell vividly portrays a motley cast of characters, from hydrologists to power brokers; wryly parses the disastrous mix of Bureau of Reclamation politics and water policy; dramatically chronicles the pitched battles between dug-in government officials and improvising environmentalists; and offers lucid analysis of the difficult choices ahead. --Donna Seaman
Review
"A historically important, well-timed, and memorable addition to the growing library of books about water and the West."--Wilson Quarterly
"A solid primer on the history of use of Colorado River water and the science of
climate change."--Science (Aaas)
climate change."--Science (Aaas)
"A suspense thriller, a history . . . and an informed warning. . . . Deserves to be read now, before we make even more mistakes."--High Country News
"A must read for Colorado River buffs, as well as anyone who wants a glimpse of what lies ahead for water."--Earth Magazine
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Authors
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
36 of 43 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
The apocalyptic book Dead Pool tells us that there is a 50% chance of Lake Powell and the whole Colorado River dam system ending up as a "dead pool" by 2017 to 2021, OR SOONER, due to global warming (p. 184). Dead pool is defined as a permanent condition when the water level behind a dam is too low to spill water or generate hydroelectric power.
Powell extols early Colorado River explorer and anti-urban founder of the U.S. Geological Survey, John Wesley Powell, which Lake Powell is named after. But author James Powell never tells us if he is related.
Powell is a master story teller and educator. His book will teach the average reader much about the water system in the Southwest. He starts his book with an apocalyptic story of near dam collapse of the Glen Canyon Dam due to too much water in 1983; and ends his book with the story of how civilization in the Southwestern U.S., like the Indians in Chaco Canyon in the 12th century, will end soon due to too little water due to global warming resulting in dead and over-silted dams.
For proof positive Powell has a graphic photo on the cover of his book showing the present-day bathtub ring on Lake Powell; way, way above the water line. How could he be wrong? Look at the picture. Run the numbers and look at the data as Powell has done.
But the gnawing question after reading Powell's apocalyptic book remains: is he right; and if so, how right?
One of the centerpieces of Powell's argument is a bar graph on page 164 which shows the 10-Year Average Annual Flow at the northerly point of the Colorado River dam system from 1896 to 2007 measured in acre feet (an acre foot of water is one foot high of water spread over an acre of land; able to support about two urban families for a year).
A cursory look at the graph doesn't support Powell's apocalyptic claims. The graph shows fourteen years when the water flow in the Colorado River exceeded 20 million acre feet; and fourteen years when it fell below ten million acre feet. The average was 13.6 million acre feet (MAF). Two other times (in 1934 and 1977) the water flow in the River has fallen as low, or lower, than it was in 2001 (about 12.5 MAF). In 1979 the flow dropped to a low of 6 MAF. In 1984 the flow reached an all-time recorded high just over 25 MAF. What makes Powell convinced this is any different now and that water flows won't rebound, FOREVER?
Powell is certain that global warming will defy the statistical Law of Regression or gravitation toward the mean average because he is convinced that global warming is permanent. This is the problem I have with both global warming advocates and denialists. There is data that can show global warming or no global warming, whichever you choose. Powell looks into the mirror pool and chooses data to prove permanent warming. But this isn't science because in science you try to refute or falsify your own hypothesis.
Another assertion of Powell's book is that dams result in less water because impounding water behind dams results in higher evaporation. But Powell ignores the obvious: dams bring new water to former dry places; namely cities and farms. Neither does Powell mention the benefits of dams and regional water hydraulic systems: such as eliminating disease by sanitation systems; or saving forests by reducing the burning of wood for fuel by providing water for people to move off farms to cities. Instead, Powell advocates a return to the vision of explorer John Wesley Powell to live self-sufficiently on a 160-acre tract of land (p. 44-45; 245).
Powell frames his dam drama in religious language. Powell's antagonists, pro-dam politicians and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, are not just flawed or bureaucratic, they are portrayed as evil. Like John Wesley Powell, James Lawrence Powell is fond of Mormon theological socialism and irrigation systems (p. 35). Wesley Powell was opposed to the "theology" of Floyd Dominy, who is portrayed as an archetypical evil commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (p. 136). The Colorado River Compact Commissioners were driven by a religious "Manifest Destiny." And anti-capitalist and anti-modernist Wesley Powell is quoted as saying he was "more interested in the home and the cradle than in the bank counter."
Dead Pool is bound to be cited as secular scripture in the anti-dam movement like the story of Noah and the Ark in the Book of Genesis in the Judeo-Christian Bible; only the story is that of a drought instead of a flood. And like Noah, for all we know, Powell could be right. But what is the order of magnitude of probability for his anti-dam apocalyptic to justify his radical prescriptions?
Powell is a certaintist. Like all fundamentalists, he is convinced he is right. I have come to learn to be skeptical of certaintists, whether religious or secular. Powell's book takes you on a long mule ride in time down the Colorado River and Lake Powell. But is the imminent demise of Lake Powell a mirror pool of his own making?
Buy the book. It is a great read no matter what your take on it.
Powell extols early Colorado River explorer and anti-urban founder of the U.S. Geological Survey, John Wesley Powell, which Lake Powell is named after. But author James Powell never tells us if he is related.
Powell is a master story teller and educator. His book will teach the average reader much about the water system in the Southwest. He starts his book with an apocalyptic story of near dam collapse of the Glen Canyon Dam due to too much water in 1983; and ends his book with the story of how civilization in the Southwestern U.S., like the Indians in Chaco Canyon in the 12th century, will end soon due to too little water due to global warming resulting in dead and over-silted dams.
For proof positive Powell has a graphic photo on the cover of his book showing the present-day bathtub ring on Lake Powell; way, way above the water line. How could he be wrong? Look at the picture. Run the numbers and look at the data as Powell has done.
But the gnawing question after reading Powell's apocalyptic book remains: is he right; and if so, how right?
One of the centerpieces of Powell's argument is a bar graph on page 164 which shows the 10-Year Average Annual Flow at the northerly point of the Colorado River dam system from 1896 to 2007 measured in acre feet (an acre foot of water is one foot high of water spread over an acre of land; able to support about two urban families for a year).
A cursory look at the graph doesn't support Powell's apocalyptic claims. The graph shows fourteen years when the water flow in the Colorado River exceeded 20 million acre feet; and fourteen years when it fell below ten million acre feet. The average was 13.6 million acre feet (MAF). Two other times (in 1934 and 1977) the water flow in the River has fallen as low, or lower, than it was in 2001 (about 12.5 MAF). In 1979 the flow dropped to a low of 6 MAF. In 1984 the flow reached an all-time recorded high just over 25 MAF. What makes Powell convinced this is any different now and that water flows won't rebound, FOREVER?
Powell is certain that global warming will defy the statistical Law of Regression or gravitation toward the mean average because he is convinced that global warming is permanent. This is the problem I have with both global warming advocates and denialists. There is data that can show global warming or no global warming, whichever you choose. Powell looks into the mirror pool and chooses data to prove permanent warming. But this isn't science because in science you try to refute or falsify your own hypothesis.
Another assertion of Powell's book is that dams result in less water because impounding water behind dams results in higher evaporation. But Powell ignores the obvious: dams bring new water to former dry places; namely cities and farms. Neither does Powell mention the benefits of dams and regional water hydraulic systems: such as eliminating disease by sanitation systems; or saving forests by reducing the burning of wood for fuel by providing water for people to move off farms to cities. Instead, Powell advocates a return to the vision of explorer John Wesley Powell to live self-sufficiently on a 160-acre tract of land (p. 44-45; 245).
Powell frames his dam drama in religious language. Powell's antagonists, pro-dam politicians and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, are not just flawed or bureaucratic, they are portrayed as evil. Like John Wesley Powell, James Lawrence Powell is fond of Mormon theological socialism and irrigation systems (p. 35). Wesley Powell was opposed to the "theology" of Floyd Dominy, who is portrayed as an archetypical evil commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (p. 136). The Colorado River Compact Commissioners were driven by a religious "Manifest Destiny." And anti-capitalist and anti-modernist Wesley Powell is quoted as saying he was "more interested in the home and the cradle than in the bank counter."
Dead Pool is bound to be cited as secular scripture in the anti-dam movement like the story of Noah and the Ark in the Book of Genesis in the Judeo-Christian Bible; only the story is that of a drought instead of a flood. And like Noah, for all we know, Powell could be right. But what is the order of magnitude of probability for his anti-dam apocalyptic to justify his radical prescriptions?
Powell is a certaintist. Like all fundamentalists, he is convinced he is right. I have come to learn to be skeptical of certaintists, whether religious or secular. Powell's book takes you on a long mule ride in time down the Colorado River and Lake Powell. But is the imminent demise of Lake Powell a mirror pool of his own making?
Buy the book. It is a great read no matter what your take on it.
16 of 18 people found the following review helpful
By James Kay
Format:Hardcover
It's been 20 years now since Marc Reisner wrote Cadillac Desert. If you enjoyed it as much as I did, Dead Pool is a must read. With all that has changed regarding western water issues since 1989, Dr. Powell does an excellent job of updating the topic and adding historical perspective to those go-go years of dam building by the Bureau of Reclamation during the 50's and 60s. While Reisner could not have imagined the effects of climate change on the overused waters of the Colorado River, Dead Pool also provides eye-opening documentation on how global warming may well be the straw that breaks the camel's back. With Lake Mead at historic lows and Lake Powell little more than half full, Dead Pool is mandatory reading for anyone concerned about the future of the West.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
This is an important subject that deserves a better examination. The book gets off to an interesting start with an aborbing account of the 1983 flood and its effect on Glen Canyon dam. The middle section is an overly long recount of the dreary history of pork barrel water projects in the West.
The final section looks to the future with predictions of water shortages, mainly due to global warming. This where the book falls short, not necessarily
on the global warming subject, but on what happens next. And the author doesn't really address that. He only gives a sentence or two to the obvious outcome, and that is the cities buying out the farmers' water interest. With something like 70% of the water going to mostly low value farm crops, when shortages get severe the economic and political power of the cities will re-direct the water from crops to people. And an examination of practical water
conservation is also omitted. These are the untold stories that are missing.
The final section looks to the future with predictions of water shortages, mainly due to global warming. This where the book falls short, not necessarily
on the global warming subject, but on what happens next. And the author doesn't really address that. He only gives a sentence or two to the obvious outcome, and that is the cities buying out the farmers' water interest. With something like 70% of the water going to mostly low value farm crops, when shortages get severe the economic and political power of the cities will re-direct the water from crops to people. And an examination of practical water
conservation is also omitted. These are the untold stories that are missing.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Folly of Man
Clearly, the end of the Southwest, as we know it, is at hand. Greed and bureaucracy partnered to pull the wagon of folly to it's ultimate conclusion - the near future abandonment... Read more
Published 3 months ago by Percy Dovetonsils
4.0 out of 5 stars
Don't need to read both this AND Cadillac Desert
If you read Cadillac Desert, and have a grasp of global warming, this book doesn't really offer much new. Read more
Published 23 months ago by Stuart Sutton
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent follow-up to "Cadillac Desert"
I've often thought of the tragedy of Marc Reisner dying fairly young. I have no doubt he would have written a third edition of Cadillac Desert, had he lived long enough to have the... Read more
Published on January 30, 2011 by S. J. Snyder
5.0 out of 5 stars
great read
This is good writing and good reading,too. Alas it seems that anyone who can read the tea leaves as well as the scientific evidence of the looming droughts must have some liberal,... Read more
Published on January 26, 2011 by Jack Flobeck
5.0 out of 5 stars
A worthy (and scary) update to Cadillac Desert
I consider James Lawrence Powell's book to be a worthy successor to Marc Reisner's Cadillac Desert. (See several posts on the book over at Waterwired. Read more
Published on August 3, 2010 by David Zetland
3.0 out of 5 stars
Problematic history for promoting a vision of apocalypse
The book is a well written and a very interesting view of the western water wars that hatched the Bureau of Reclamation. Read more
Published on January 13, 2010 by John H. Peck
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Water Letter
Well written, and fully referenced. I will be using quotes out of it for some work I am writing and of course will provide the proper attributions.
Published on April 13, 2009 by Milton N. Burgess
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Listmania!
|
|
