Customer Reviews

The Death of Truth: What's Wrong With Multiculturalism, the Rejection of Reason and the New Postmodern Diversity

5 star:		(9)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

I found this book to be quite interesting, despite its repetitive style. Written by several Christian educators, it compares theism, modernism (or secular humanism), and postmodernism. They believe that postmodernism undermines all objective truth (i.e., truth that is true whether one believes it or not) and, therefore, is the death of truth, as we know it. Their thesis is that theism believes in objective truth as revealed by God; modernism believes in objective truth discovered through experience and observation, and postmodernism believes truth is subjective and determined by individuals. They aren't fans of modernism, but they believe postmodernism is downright pernicious
The basic tenants of postmodernism are:
· Reason and rationality are cultural biases, and truth, especially God's truth, doesn't exist.
· All lifestyles, religions, and worldviews are equally valid.
· The only real sin is criticizing someone else's views or moral choices.
· Opinions matter as much as evidence.
· Reality is in the mind of the beholder.
The authors believe postmodernism is the source of:
· The political correctness movement.
· Lower academic and discipline standards in public classrooms.
· Tolerance gone extreme and the rising lack of personal responsibility.
· The black community's rising separatism.
· The increasingly widespread belief that every hurt is intentional and legally actionable.
· Radical victimology.
· History is slanted in favor of white males.
· "Male" and "female" are socially created categories intended to enslave women to men.
· Hostility towards science.
To quote from page 20, "Postmodernists believe that truth is created, not discovered. They think things like reason, rationality, and confidence in science are cultural biases. They contend that those who trust reason -- and things based on reason, like science, Western education, and governmental structures -- unknowingly act out their European cultural conditioning. This conditioning seeks to keep power in the hands of the social elite."
Well, I like my European conditioning.
The authors take us through different subjects -- health, religion, science, history, literature, education, etc. -- and compare these 'isms. Not surprisingly, I find myself in agreement with parts of all three of the 'isms, on most subjects. For example, I accept the idea of cultural relativism, or paradigms. Moreover, I've often touted the idea that "reality is perception," not in an absolutist sense, but in the sense that what a person believes is true will govern that person's actions. In that sense I agree with the postmodernist view that people are never objective or rational. "Where we stand depends on where we sit." I also believe that words (semantics and syntax) have power, and how you describe something -- the words you use -- can influence others. However, I take this only up to a point, albeit that point may be where my ethnicity and class kick in. (That's certainly the case in the authors' view.)
I do not see any inherent contradiction between theism and modernism, between the Christian (or anyone else's) concept of God and science. And while I can accept some of the underlying concepts of postmodernism, I definitely do not like where the authors say affirmative postmodernism is taking us. The authors' simplistic approach, which is necessary for someone like me to take the time to read and grasp their thesis, probably necessitates the stark divisions between these 'isms and their absolutist definitions.
Going back to my fondness for my so-called European conditioning, I can see from recent history (i.e., at least the last 1,000 years or so) that European strengths have prevailed over all others with which we have come into contact. Europeans are an inquisitive, individualistic, scientific, warlike culture that hasn't hesitated, until the latter half of the 20th century anyway, to throw its weight around. It has serious flaws -- arrogance, callousness, and greed, to name a few -- but so do all other cultures. We have progressed politically and socially, however. Ironically, it may be that very progress that will bring about our demise. Blacks, for example, for all the righteousness of their cause as they struggled out of slavery and segregation in the United States, could not have done so had there not been significant numbers of white people championing their cause. Blacks have never had the strength of numbers to rise up militarily and throw off the yoke of slavery in this country (although it was often tried - more often, I suspect, than most people realize). In fact, it was only in the past fifty years that have they had the political strength to change the laws in this country and even then it took white support. Moreover, there has been no international pressure put on this country to change. It has always taken American white sympathy -- whites' sense of justice -- to enable those things to happen.
I'm not arguing that it should have been otherwise. Rather, I'm just recognizing what I see in history. Whites (along with help from Arabs and other black Africans) put blacks into slavery in the New World, and it was whites that pulled them out of it. In the United States, it was white Americans. To the extent that blacks refuse to acknowledge this is unfortunate, as is the extent to which white Americans are abrogating, or denying, the very qualities that made us great. White Americans of European heritage have just as much of which to be proud as do any other race, and vice versa. I worry, though, that the high rate of immigration into this country will dilute European traits (steeped in northwest and north central European heritage) and thereby destroy the very thing that makes this country worth immigrating to in the first place.
Well, that was a bit of digression, but I see a connection between the authors' description of postmodernism and the potential erosion of our European values and way of life. I endorse diversity and believe that our American culture benefits from it. I just don't want it to morph into something unrecognizable.
Anyway, this is an excellent book.

First of all, I appreciate it so much when authors will write books on very difficult, abstract subjects in such an easy to understand way. Don't let the title or subject material scare you...you'll probably be able to get through it with no problem. They explain the common views (modernism, post modernism, and christian) on some of the most important areas in life (religion, law, health care, education, etc). There's also tons of references for further reading. I was very unfamiliar with these subjects, and feel that I now understand the basics of how they developed, the present impact and the future impact of these ideologies.

I have read this book with pleasure: It is not too difficult, it is written by many writers with their own style. I think the writers have written this book especially for Christians, for example students, parents with children, sick people who wants to know more about health care, and so on. The strength of this book is that it shows the important impact of postmodernism on many topics in our society, I have learned much. Its weakness is the less philosophical content, in this book it is for me not clear for which reasons christianity is the third way besides modernism and postmodernism. Is it the only alternative? Because this is not very clear and there is no good (philosophical) foundation, sometimes the arguments are somewhat fideistic, although the writers are against fideism. If you want to know more about the philosophical foundations, then you have to read other books. I highly recommend this book, especially for Christians. It can open your eyes for many developments in society and churches. Also non-christians who are interested in postmodernism, modernism or perhaps christianity will have pleasure by reading this book.

This book reads very easily, is clear and is helpful for practically recognizing and refuting postmodernism in many fields (health care, literature, education, history, psychotherapy, law, natural science and religion.) It will probably be very valuable for many as it is directly applicable in many situations. There was certainly much need for such a book, great that it has come! (Another practical and helpful book is Beckwith's recent "Relativism: Feet firmly planted in Mid-Air", 1998; in the same vein, there is also Watkins' "the New Absolutes", 1996.)

Unfortunately, this book (the Death of Truth) is philosophically wholly inadequate, mainly in the essays of Jim Leffel, who is confused about epistemology (adopting a fundamentalist view that cannot give any answer to postmodernism), about the definition of "theism" (which he identifies with neocalvinism) and "modernism" (which he strangely identifies for much of it with traditional Christianity), etc. For a historical and philosophical exposition of postmodernism, with a refutation, I would rather recommend Floyd Centore's "Being and Becoming: a Critique of Postmodernism" (1991): it remains in my opinion the best philosphical analysis of postmodernism and its roots, and gives the real antidote! Many interesting insights can also be found in Ciapolo's "Postmodernism and Christian Philosophy" (1997). And for a way of defending Christianity which is postmodern-proof, the unbeatable book remains Geisler's "Christian Apologetics" (1976). All these books (Centore, Ciapolo, Geisler) are however at another level (academic, more difficult) than McCallum's or Beckwith's, which are popular works aimed at the very broad readership.

After reading this book, it is now clear to me what the driving force is behind what is taking place rignt now in Washington D.C.. If you have been mystified by the justifications for the sordid actions of many of our leaders not only in politics, but also in law and education, read this book. It will be a mystery no more!

I am impressed with the effort of this work. The authors have certainly made clear inroads to a lay explanation of postmodern philosophy. The book contains more than opinion and cites sources so that statements can be verified.

This is, perhaps, the most important book written in the last ten years for those who want to understand modernism, post-modernism, multiculturalism and the various types of relativism, including moral relativism.
Ever wonder why some politicians seem to lie and misrepresent the facts while on the campaign trail? When Clinton was in office, were you concerned by his cavalier dismissal of the prevailing code of morality that has made America great? Were you perplexed that he could appear on TV and brazenly wag his finger at the American people and claim, "I did not have sex with that woman!" and then go on to lie under oath in interrogatories and in a deposition in the Paula Jones case? Well, after reading this book, you'll understand how Clinton and so many others in his administration could do just that.
... If everybody is lying to everybody else because they no longer believe that truth exists or if it does it's whatever they want it to be at that moment, then nobody will be able to trust anybody about anything. Since so much in a free society depends upon truth and trust, it would be a disasterous development for our culture were relativism in general and moral relativism in particular to become more pervasive than it already has. That's just one of many reasons why postmodernism, which promotes the relativisms, must be opposed.

Dennis McCallum has done a great job explaining why nothing in our society seems to make sense any longer. The book is, mildly stated, a masterpiece, though it does demand a better than average I.Q. and an academic background. It is not for feather brains and airheads. The first few chapters are heavy slogging, but well worth the trouble. Near the end, McCallum fits the puzzle together, and the book makes a great deal of sense. I recommend this book not only to Christians, but especially to secular thinkers,who are now beginning to ask themselves what has gone wrong in our Western world view .

I have read this book with pleasure: It is not too difficult, it is written by many writers with their own style. I think the writers have written this book especially for Christians, for example students, parents with children, sick people who wants to know more about health care, and so on. The strength of this book is that it shows the important impact of postmodernism on many topics in our society, I have learned much. Its weakness is the less philosophical content, in this book it is for me not clear for which reasons christianity is the third way besides modernism and postmodernism. Is it the only alternative? Because this is not very clear and there is no good (philosophical) foundation, sometimes the arguments are somewhat fideistic, although the writers are against fideism. If you want to know more about the philosophical foundations, then you have to read other books. I highly recommend this book, especially for Christians. It can open your eyes for many developments in society and churches. Also non-christians who are interested in postmodernism, modernism and perhaps christianity will have pleasure by reading this book.

This book makes avaliable to the reader an explanation of what we are witnessing in our current cuture: post modernism, in the ultimate of understandable terms.