Amazon.com: Decision: How the Supreme Court Decides Cases (Oxford Paperbacks) (9780195118001): Bernard Schwartz: Books

Buy New

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
Buy Used
Used - Good See details
$3.70 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Decision: How the Supreme Court Decides Cases (Oxford Paperbacks)
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Decision: How the Supreme Court Decides Cases (Oxford Paperbacks) [Paperback]

Bernard Schwartz (Author)
2.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Price: $39.99 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it delivered Monday, February 27? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Textbook Student FREE Two-Day Shipping for students on millions of items. Learn more

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback $39.99  

Book Description

October 30, 1997 0195118006 978-0195118001
Decision days appear to outsiders as among the most dramatic events on the Supreme Court calendar. One thinks, for instance, of Chief Justice Earl Warren, reading the unanimous opinion in Brown v. Board of Education in a courtroom pervaded by tension. But the real drama of Brown and other Supreme Court cases may well have been what went on behind the scenes. Rarely do the arguments of counsel--brilliant though they may appear to the courtroom audience--dictate the decision in an important Supreme Court case. Rather, the crucial argument in a case takes place privately among the Justices after the public hearing.
Decision provides a unique behind-the-scenes look at the Supreme Court and how its Justices decide cases. Distinguished author Bernard Schwartz, described by The New York Times as "one of the nation's leading legal scholars," uses confidential conference notes, draft opinions, memoranda, letters, and interviews to tell what really goes on behind the red velour curtain. Cases and anecdotes, woven into deft discussions of the Justices and how they function, provide unmatched insights into our high tribunal. We read of the conferences where the Justices cast their votes, the decisions as to who will write opinions (one of the most critical choices made by the Chief Justice), the often extensive give and take of the draft opinion, and the intense lobbying between Justices that influences vote changes (it was Chief Justice Earl Warren's pressure on Justice Reed in Brown that made the final vote unanimous).
Schwartz focuses on the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist courts, providing not just vivid portraits of the Chief Justices themselves, but also profiles of many Associate Justices in action--including Felix Frankfurter, Byron R. White, Sandra Day O'Connor, William J. Brennan, Thurgood Marshall, and John Paul Stevens. And Schwartz includes an eye-opening discussion of the expanding role of the Justices' clerks, revealing that they are no longer merely a "staff of assistants." Instead, they have evolved into a sort of "Junior Supreme Court," which performs a major part of the judicial role--including the writing of opinions--delegated by the Constitution to the Justices themselves.
Decision gives readers a privileged look at countless cases throughout the Court's history, from the Dred Scott decision to Miranda v. Arizona to the controversial decision in Roe v. Wade to United States v. Nixon (the Watergate tapes case). Highly readable, yet written with impeccable scholarship, Decision shows the Justices in action as never before. Everything you wanted to know about the Supreme Court and were afraid to ask is here, in a revealing work on the institution that has had such an impact on our law and our life.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

In a book aimed at specialists, veteran court-watcher Schwartz (A History of the Supreme Court) draws on archives, including the files of recently retired Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall, and confidential interviews to describe internal court arguments on cases recent and long past. He begins with a close analysis of the arguments-especially what he terms the manipulations of Chief Justice William Rehnquist-in the Webster abortion case, then admiringly describes the leadership of "Super Chief" Earl Warren, who gained all-important unanimity in the Brown v. Board of Education desegregation case (1954). Chief Justice Warren Burger, on the other hand, found his work regularly modified by pressure from his colleagues that led to an "opinion by committee" in cases such as the Nixon Watergate appeal. Schwartz also analyzes cases in which associate justices (Brennan, for example) took temporary leadership of the court, and how justices switched votes in crucial cases. He concludes by worrying that judges' young law clerks retain too much power as gatekeepers to the court, and endorses a 1972 proposal by a court-appointed committee to create a new court of appeals to screen all petitions for appeal.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From Booklist

This fascinating book shows how the major decisions of the Supreme Court came to be, including Roe v. Wade. In that case, Chief Justice Rehnquist, whose personality became much more serious when he was appointed chief, continued to push hard to have the case overturned. Similarly, author Schwartz delves into the legal issues of other cases over the last decade and a half when the Court changed complexion from the more liberal Burger Court to the more conservative Rehnquist Court. The author himself is often apt to blame zealous law clerks for influencing justices buried under mountains of work, but the most interesting material is the personalities. Justice Felix Frankfurter would become livid and his voice would become a high-pitched squeal; Chief Justice Burger had perfected the good ol' boy network by giving his friends the plum decision-writing assignments; associates respected Justice William Brennan, the cocky liberal leader of the Court during the 1970s and 1980s--or did they fear him? In all, a terrific primer on the Supreme Court, the true lawgivers of the republic. Joe Collins --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA (October 30, 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0195118006
  • ISBN-13: 978-0195118001
  • Product Dimensions: 8 x 5.4 x 0.6 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 7.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 2.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,538,177 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

1 Review
5 star:    (0)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

9 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars The Politics of Supreme Court Decision Making, March 3, 1999
By A Customer
I was greatly disappointed with the book. Schwartz didn't pay attention to who his audience is: we are not a general reading public but rather one with an interest in, and some level of sophistication of, the US Supreme Court. In other words, we expect sourcing and citing of ideas. With too many "a case did this" and "a book says that" without the sourcing, I gave up. Moreover, it was pretty clear that the stalwarts of the Warren Court: Warren, Black, Brennan could do no wrong. Although it may be semi-true for the latter two, Warren was a glad-handing arm-twisting politician who's most famous opinion (Brown) was as dull as dish water to read. But its easier to pick on Rehnquist because he couldn't convince a majority to follow him on one single issue -- albeit an important issue. Yes, that's the learned perspective we get from this book. Ultimately, I can see the general media wanting to read this book to help "educate" them, but as for political scientists, law professors, legal journalists and the like there is little value to this book other than that Schwartz had access to private communications of some of the Justices, but we know not whom and know not when he uses it (and whether he uses it correctly).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject