|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Review
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A persuasive and fascinating case,
By Midwest Book Review (Oregon, WI USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Defending America:The Case for Limited National Missile Defense (Hardcover)
In Defending America: The Case For Limited National Missile Defense, authors James Lindsay and Michael O'Hanlon collaboratively offer cogent and practical recommendations on building an effective missile defense system. Their suggested plan requires a critical change in the 1972 ABM Treaty and highlights the so-called "boost-phase interceptors" for land, sea, or air. Preferring extensive research and development efforts to a system rushed out the door, these authors make a persuasive and fascinating case. Those who disagree with their views are even more highly encouraged to read Defending America, for it is substantively important to know all sides of the debate over this controversial, critical, and contemporary national issue.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Defending America:The Case for Limited National Missile Defense by James M. Lindsay (Hardcover - April 30, 2001)
$39.95 $29.54
In Stock | |
 
| ||
