The central thesis of philosopher David Boonin is that the moral case against abortion can be shown to be unsuccessful on terms that critics of abortion can and do accept. Critically examining a wide array of arguments that have attempted to establish that every human fetus has a right to life, Boonin posits that all of these arguments fail on their own terms. He then argues that even if the fetus does have a right to life, abortion can still be shown to be morally permissible on the critic of abortion's own terms. Finally, Boonin considers a number of arguments against abortion that do not depend on the claim that the fetus has a right to life, including those based on the golden rule, considerations of uncertainty and a commitment to certain feminist principles, and asserts that these positions, too, are ultimately unsuccessful. The result is the most thorough and detailed case for the moral permissibility of abortion that has yet been written. David Boonin is professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado. He is the author of Thomas Hobbes and the Science of Moral Virtue (Cambridge, 1994).
A Defense of Abortion
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
 Sell Back Your Copy for $16.00
No matter where you bought them, get up to 70% back when you sell your books at Amazon.com.
Used Price$33.00
Trade-in Price$16.00
Price after
Trade-in$17.00 |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
Review
"I have never read a better examination of all the arguments that have been raised against abortion. Nor have I read a better series of counter arguments against each of these arguments." Rosemarie Tong, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
"This book is a truly wonderful piece of applied analytic moral philosophy. It considers an extremely important issue and reasons carefully, clearly, cleverly, and convincingly. The set of arguments surveyed is so complete that there is something for virtually anyone with any stake in the issue--philosophers, religious persons, feminists.... By refuting all arguments for the claim that abortion is not permissible, on grounds that the abortion critics themselves can accept.... The book is so overwhelmingly genuine and convincingly argued."
Ethics
"This book is a truly wonderful piece of applied analytic moral philosophy. It considers an extremely important issue and reasons carefully, clearly, cleverly, and convincingly. The set of arguments surveyed is so complete that there is something for virtually anyone with any stake in the issue--philosophers, religious persons, feminists.... By refuting all arguments for the claim that abortion is not permissible, on grounds that the abortion critics themselves can accept.... The book is so overwhelmingly genuine and convincingly argued."
Ethics
Book Description
David Boonin has written the most thorough and detailed case for the moral permissibility of abortion yet published. Critically examining a wide range of arguments that attempt to prove that every human fetus has a right to life, he shows that each of these arguments fails on its own terms. He then explains how even if the fetus does have a right to life, abortion can still be shown to be morally permissible on the critic of abortion's own terms.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 18 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
The philosophical issue of abortion has been plagued with the difficulty of situating itself in a way whereby it can be successfully discussed. Often, proponents from a rights-based platform do battle against opponents from a moral-wrong platform and no claims are held in common. Thus, discussions in the literature tend to go past one another making the abortion issue nearly impossible to navigate. Boonin's book begins with a chapter where this problem is addressed and managed, at least to a degree whereby the dozens of arguments concerning abortion can be classified or organized in a logical sequence. He then proceeds to dismiss all arguments against abortion using claims the opponent of abortion accepts.
Boonin uses the Rawlsian approach of reflective equilibrium in his analysis of the abortion issue. Chapters 2-4 concern "rights-based" arguments and the final chapter addresses "non-rights" based arguments. This text is written in true analytic form where non-obvious distinctions are noted and used to clarify weaknesses in all arguments which claim abortion is wrong or impermissible. What Boonin does well in the process is to provide a thorough literature review of all claims made about abortion over the last thirty years.
An overall highlight of this text includes Boonin's ability to discuss weaknesses in arguments by analogy. For example, the now classic "violinist analogy" set forth by J. Thomson, and tacit consent arguments. If you are interested in the topics of arguments by analaogy in general, you will get a kick about of this part of the text! This is a very readable text for one with an intermediate to advanced background in philosophical argument and analysis.
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful
By infoglutton
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
I used this book as a way to better structure arguments for debate on abortion. It took the arguments I had, discounted them, and gave me better ones.
A background in informal logic and philosophy will certainly be helpful to the reader here. While this book is really the most comprehensive of its kind, it is not a simple read. I had to take notes just to understand some of the complexities within arguments. Fortunately, I was also able to read this with a friend, which made dense parts of the book easier.
The author is careful in framing the debate and stresses arguing on an opponent's own terms. The author explains the contrast between morally criticizable and morally permissible. Moral relevance is also an essential idea. Further, the author establishes a moraly relevant criterion by brain development that may act as a cutoff point late in pregnancy so that it is still morally impermissible to kill an infant. I recommend previewing the table of contents to get a flavor of argument structure and the arguments covered. I have not encountered a topic that was not covered in the book except for maybe ageism. However, after reading this book my reasoning was developed enough to where I practically laid out a proof as to what ageism was and was not and why it was not a valid objection.
I think this book may have been a little stronger had it looked at more than fetal rights in isolation, but rather also mention that what the question being asked is does the fetus's right to life outweigh the mother's right to her body and vice-versa. Fetal rights arguments are thoroughly explained as well as non-rights based arguments. This book has also been helpful in detailing how the logic works in analogies and why the weirdness objection is not valid. The author also takes apart the violinist analogy and explains why it is poor. Because of this book, even though I am pro-choice since I think it has a stronger argument, I can argue strongly on either side.
Even if you are pro-choice, you should make sure you are pro-choice for logical reasons. I know many pro-choice people that couldn't answer standard pro-life objections. If you are pro-life, this book will challenge all your arguments and at least make you think of the issue differently. I recommend this to anyone who takes a stance on the issue and definitely anyone interested in philosophy, informal logic, and debate.
A background in informal logic and philosophy will certainly be helpful to the reader here. While this book is really the most comprehensive of its kind, it is not a simple read. I had to take notes just to understand some of the complexities within arguments. Fortunately, I was also able to read this with a friend, which made dense parts of the book easier.
The author is careful in framing the debate and stresses arguing on an opponent's own terms. The author explains the contrast between morally criticizable and morally permissible. Moral relevance is also an essential idea. Further, the author establishes a moraly relevant criterion by brain development that may act as a cutoff point late in pregnancy so that it is still morally impermissible to kill an infant. I recommend previewing the table of contents to get a flavor of argument structure and the arguments covered. I have not encountered a topic that was not covered in the book except for maybe ageism. However, after reading this book my reasoning was developed enough to where I practically laid out a proof as to what ageism was and was not and why it was not a valid objection.
I think this book may have been a little stronger had it looked at more than fetal rights in isolation, but rather also mention that what the question being asked is does the fetus's right to life outweigh the mother's right to her body and vice-versa. Fetal rights arguments are thoroughly explained as well as non-rights based arguments. This book has also been helpful in detailing how the logic works in analogies and why the weirdness objection is not valid. The author also takes apart the violinist analogy and explains why it is poor. Because of this book, even though I am pro-choice since I think it has a stronger argument, I can argue strongly on either side.
Even if you are pro-choice, you should make sure you are pro-choice for logical reasons. I know many pro-choice people that couldn't answer standard pro-life objections. If you are pro-life, this book will challenge all your arguments and at least make you think of the issue differently. I recommend this to anyone who takes a stance on the issue and definitely anyone interested in philosophy, informal logic, and debate.
By Ben C.
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
The author takes painfully detailed philosophical approach to the question: when does the fetus gain a right to life?
The book is accessible and thorough. A handy reference guide.
It's most impressive for its goal of defending abortion using arguments that pro-life folks already accept.
The book is accessible and thorough. A handy reference guide.
It's most impressive for its goal of defending abortion using arguments that pro-life folks already accept.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
Complementary readings
There are already a couple of good reviews to this book, so I will only add that it is extremely easy to follow and in order to savour it one only needs to be a curious layperson. Read more
Published on November 8, 2009 by César González Rouco
1.0 out of 5 stars
Worst Book ever Written
Bah,
Another political book! Please save your money and send it to a pro-life agency.
The abortion issue is not complex or complicated. It is MURDER! Read more
Another political book! Please save your money and send it to a pro-life agency.
The abortion issue is not complex or complicated. It is MURDER! Read more
Published on June 9, 2009 by Martin J. Olichwier
Citations (learn more)
This book cites 100
books:
See all 100 books this book cites
17
books
cite this book:
See all 17 books citing this book
- The Abortion Controversy: A Reader (Jones and Bartlett Series in Nursing) by Louis P. Pojman on 8 pages
- Abortion: The Moral Issues by Edward, Jr. Batchelor on 5 pages
- Arguing About Abortion by Lewis M. Schwartz on 4 pages
- American Life by Rh Value Publishing on 4 pages
- The Problem of Abortion by Joel Feinberg in Back Matter (1), Back Matter (2), and Back Matter (3)
See all 100 books this book cites
- Toward a Theory of Human Rights: Religion, Law, Courts by Michael J. Perry on 4 pages
- The Edge of Life: Human Dignity and Contemporary Bioethics (Philosophy and Medicine / Catholic Studies in Bioethics) by Christopher Kaczor on page 24, page 32, and page 51
- Fact and Value: Essays on Ethics and Metaphysics for Judith Jarvis Thomson by Alex Byrne on page 197, and page 198
- Ethics and Foreign Intervention (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy) by Deen K. Chatterjee in Front Matter
- Pursuing Equal Opportunities: The Theory and Practice of Egalitarian Justice (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy) by Lesley A. Jacobs in Front Matter
See all 17 books citing this book
Books on Related Topics
(learn more)
|
