Most Helpful Customer Reviews
206 of 248 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Do we really need to relearn the lessons of Japanese America, September 26, 2004
This review is from: In Defense of Internment: The Case for Racial Profiling in World War II and the War on Terror (Hardcover)
Do we really need to relearn the lessons of Japanese American internment?
Fred Korematsu
In 1942, I was arrested and convicted for being a Japanese American trying to live here in the Bay Area. The day after my arrest a newspaper headline declared, "Jap Spy Arrested in San Leandro."
Of course, I was no spy. The government never charged me with being a spy. I was a U.S. citizen born and raised in Oakland. I even tried to enlist in the Coast Guard (they didn't take me because of my race). But my citizenship and my loyalty did not matter to the federal government. On Feb. 19, 1942, anyone of Japanese heritage was ordered excluded from the West Coast. I was charged and convicted of being a Japanese American living in an area in which all people of my ancestry had been ordered to be interned.
I fought my conviction at that time. My case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, but in 1944 my efforts to seek protection under the Constitution were rejected.
After I was released in 1945, my criminal record continued to affect my life. It was hard to find work. I was considered to be a criminal. It took almost 40 years and the efforts of many people to reopen my case. In 1983, a federal court judge found that the government had hidden evidence and lied to the Supreme Court during my appeal. The judge found that Japanese Americans were not the threat that the government publicly claimed. My criminal record was removed.
As my case was being reconsidered by the courts, again as a result of the efforts of many people across the country, Congress created a commission to study the exclusion and incarceration of Japanese Americans. The commission found that no Japanese American had been involved in espionage or sabotage and that no military necessity existed to imprison us. Based on the commission's findings and of military historians who reconsidered the original records from the war, Congress passed the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, declaring that the internment of Japanese Americans was unjustified. Finally, it seemed that the burden of being accused of being an "enemy race" had been lifted from our shoulders.
But now the old accusations are back. Fox News media personality Michelle Malkin claims that some Japanese Americans were spies during World War II. Based upon her suspicions, Malkin claims the internment of all Japanese Americans was not such a bad idea after all. She goes on to claim that racial profiling of Arab Americans today is justified by the need to fight terrorism. According to Malkin, it is OK to take away an entire ethnic group's civil rights because some individuals are suspect. Malkin argues for reviving the old notion of guilt by association.
It is painful to see reopened for serious debate the question of whether the government was justified in imprisoning Japanese Americans during World War II. It was my hope that my case and the cases of other Japanese American internees would be remembered for the dangers of racial and ethnic scapegoating.
Fears and prejudices directed against minority communities are too easy to evoke and exaggerate, often to serve the political agendas of those who promote those fears. I know what it is like to be at the other end of such scapegoating and how difficult it is to clear one's name after unjustified suspicions are endorsed as fact by the government. If someone is a spy or terrorist they should be prosecuted for their actions. But no one should ever be locked away simply because they share the same race, ethnicity, or religion as a spy or terrorist. If that principle was not learned from the internment of Japanese Americans, then these are very dangerous times for our democracy.
Fred Korematsu was awarded the nation's highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medial of Freedom, in 1998. He and his wife, Kathryn, continue to live in their longtime hometown of San Leandro.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
154 of 194 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Loyalty of Japanese Americans during WWII going unheeded, September 6, 2004
This review is from: In Defense of Internment: The Case for Racial Profiling in World War II and the War on Terror (Hardcover)
As a conservative, pro-life, "traditional family values" Republican third generation American of Japanese ancestry, I was shocked and saddened by the gross inaccuracies in Malkin's book.
For example, the book purports one of the basic, underlying reasons for internment was the Japanese espionage "threat" on the West Coast. However, Japanese Americans during WWII were among the most loyal to America, and many served valiantly for the U.S. during the war.
According to the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians in a report entitled, "Personal Justice Denied", it stated that "not a single documented act of espionage, sabatoge or fifth column activity on the mainland was committed by an American citizen of Japanese ancestry or by a resident Japanese alien on the West Coast." This view has been substantiated consistently by independent scholars and researchers for almost 50 years since WWII.
Two of my uncles, although interned, volunteered to enlist in the U.S. Army in the 442nd Regimental Combat Unit. One of my uncles in the unit earned a REAL Purple Heart after he sustained extensive damage to his ear when an enemy grenade exploded near his head while fighting for the U.S. in Europe during the war.
The 442nd suffered huge numbers of casualties and is the most decorated combat unit in American history. They were credited for saving a Texas unit trapped behind Nazi lines, although a significantly larger number of Japanese American U.S. soldiers lost their lives rescuing them than the total number of soldiers that were in the Texas unit.
My mom, a U.S.-born American citizen, was also interned during the war. She felt as if she were without a country. Yet she never, ever considered turning her back on this nation she calls "home". She, along with my family, proudly display American flag decals on our clothes and our cars.
Yes, I strongly believe America needs to continue to vigorously fight for freedom here in our homeland and abroad, and defend itself against terrorism. I also have confidence that America, through prayer, wise decision-making and courageous, measured action will pro-actively prevent the mistakes of the past and implement much more innovative and effective means of fighting 21st century terrorism rather than even considering reverting to the extreme, heinous act of wholesale incarceration of innocent people without due process.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
75 of 93 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Let's imprison Michelle at Manzanar and see how she likes it, August 26, 2004
This review is from: In Defense of Internment: The Case for Racial Profiling in World War II and the War on Terror (Hardcover)
Apparently Michelle Malkin believes in the selective, subjective, and arbitrary application of constitutional rights for US citizens. There is a vast difference between using "racial profiling" as a tool to assist in the investigation of an actual crime- for instance, looking for evidence of spying among Japanese aliens that worked for the Port Authority in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor- and "racial profiling" as an unconstitutional presumption of guilt that results in the wholesale imprisonment of citizens and legal aliens without any tangible evidence of wrongdoing. Michelle Malkin doesn't seem to recognize the moral spread between the two.
I see from other reviewers' comments that Michelle Malkin is Filipina. I wonder if Michelle Malkin would be willing to have her property stripped from her and live behind barbed wire in a tent in the desert, watched by armed guards, should the U.S. government determine that persons of Filipine descent constituted a terrorist threat to the general populace. It wouldn't be all bad: She could organize schools for the imprisoned children, eat free Army issue food, take some time off from her career, socialize in the communal latrines while she cleaned them, and publish her own newspaper. Maybe Michelle Malkin could even get the chance to swear an oath of fealty in exchange for a trip out of camp as a migrant farm worker, picking potatoes for less than minimum wage. Michelle Malkin: Will you show us your patrotism by giving up your rights? I'd be happy to provide the barbed wire and MREs.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
