5.0 out of 5 stars
Read Derrida and read this dictionary, November 22, 2010
This review is from: A Derrida Dictionary (Paperback)
The previous reviewer seems not to have read Derrida. This dictionary is actually quite wonderful. It describes, dances, inverts, re-inscribes and gathers in ways that are very much of the same spirit and practices of Derrida's own writing and writings. If you want something useful as an invitation/introduction to Derrida, at least through a certain period, this is a fantastic book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Redundant, annoyingly clever, too hip for its own good, August 12, 2008
This review is from: A Derrida Dictionary (Paperback)
First, read the effusive praises by Kamuf and Caputo-- theirs are located right below the book title. If that's enough for you, by all means buy the book. Obviously, I see things a bit differently.
Once something becomes big enough, popular enough (and in poor Derrida's case, solely by reputation of sheer impenetrability it would seem!!) to warrant a dictionary, it has probably already been abducted by, or inducted into, or infiltrated by the forces of, the Dark Side. 'Vaderized'.
This ain't your dad's dictionary. And that's not necessarily good news -- unless you are one of those super unconventional, artistically groovy people who understand that an understanding of anything only comes from the thing's textually deconstructed action in some sooon-to-be-decon'd context by way of some disavowed third thing. So, no definitions here. See Caputo's praise above.
Alrighty then. I'll tell you what, let me just take a sample. Here is an "entry" under 'W' on WRITING:
"As I start this sentence I am not absolutely sure how it will end. The only way I could have known exactly where I was going with that sentence (or any sentence) would be if I had a crystal ball, if somehow I could see into the future. Since I don't believe in clairvoyance, I don't believe anyone can see what hasn't happened yet. And every time anyone sits down to write a sentence (or to compose one mentally), the end remains to come; whatever 'happens' happens later, even if the interval between the beginning and the end lasts only for a split second."
Jee~~Zuss.
The entire book is more or less like this, with certain words -- that Derrida used often, such as EVENT, PRESENCE, IDENTITY, etc -- printed in BOLD (again, with no definition) so you can "trace" the word and cross reference the same in some other... con-text, that is.
Or,if you like, CON T ex(i)T.
If all this sounds good to you, by all means get it.
Personally, when I buy something I expect the thing to be what it claims to be. In this case, this thing claims to be a dictionary. But it's something else... something entirely unpalatable.
Well, I don't know about you, but I don't particularly relish the "radical" idea that a box of cereal could just as easily turn out to be a rectilinearly rigid sack of dried sh_it.
I am just glad dentists don't (mis)read Derrida. "By ROOT CANAL, we mean the bite marks you left on your toast this morning so we can (dis)locate the KHORA of MAN-dibular mastication by which your tongue re-enacts the geometry of speech without actually speaking."
Excessively hip people who love books like this, seem to thrive on some very bad misconstrual of Derrida's notion of HOSPITALITY -- they allow themselves so generously to put out bad books, and abuse good Jacques' name AND hospitality. Poor Jacky.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
