The primary purpose of this book has not been to recount all that past scholars have said about the science, but rather to record the first appearances of those ideas which seem most important in the logic of our own day.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Historic Achievement!,
By
This review is from: The Development of Logic (Paperback)
A colossus of a book with an enourmous treasury of information! Sure, as some of the other reviewers have complained, it's not equally strong on every logician or epoch, but who could reasonably expect that?
A definite must read for any student of logic, not only because it is packed with interesting information and illuminating exposition but also because many sections are quite engagingly written. In addition to being surprisinlgy suitable for "cover to cover"-reading the massive index enables one to use it as a historic encyclopedia of logic.
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Uneven but worth while,
By galloamericanus "galloamericanus" (Podunk, Iowa) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Development of Logic (Paperback)
Very strong on Frege, although because it was written in 1962,it cannot reflect the ample scholarship of the past 40 years.
Meticulous about the logic of the classical era. Deprecates Lukasiewicz's attempt to formalize the syllogism (Arthur Prior's Formal Logic does a better job on this technical topic.) They do NOT do justice to how Leibniz is the most exciting logician between Aristotle and Boole. Good on Boole, because Wm Kneale contributed importantly to the postwar Boole revival. Slights the important contributions of Charles Sanders Peirce, although again, his importance has become much clearer since this book was written. Surprisingly lukewarm about Principia Mathematica. Fairly clear about topics (eg, recursive arithmetic) other texts make difficult.
8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A major flaw,
By galloamericanus "galloamericanus" (Podunk, Iowa) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Development of Logic (Paperback)
A major flaw is K&K's silence about Whately's Logic of 1826. This book , which went into many editions over nearly 100years, was instrumental in the revival of logic in the English speaking world. Reading Whately made logicians out of De Morgan, C S Peirce, William Hamilton. For the history of logic after 1840 or so, K&K is superseded by Grattan-Guiness's The Search for Mathematical Roots.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|