| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Devil's Dominion,
By ggcon (Connecticut) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Devil's Dominion: Magic and Religion in Early New England (Paperback)
Godbeer argues that although Puritan clergy were vocally against the belief in magic and use of magical techniques, Puritan theology was ambiguous enough to allow even people who were considered to be "godly" church members to believe in and practice magical rituals without feeling as if they were going against their Puritan beliefs. Puritan theology blamed all human suffering on God's judgment of the people and taught that humans could do nothing to effect His plans. Folk magic, which was a strong part of English culture, however gave people the ability to try to alleviate their suffering, especially if they blamed the suffering on a witch or other "cunning person."Puritan ministers encouraged people to believe that suffering was the result of outside forces, but they wanted people to believe the "outside force" was God punishing them for sins. Many lay people agreed that suffering was the result of an outside force, but preferred to believe it was the result of magic, which could be neutralized by using counter-magic. The belief in magic was widespread, but not universal in Puritan New England. Although some "godly" church members practiced magic, others did not. Some people were so opposed to magic that they would take down horseshoes that had been put over doors. Even some ministers believed in magic, as evidenced by the ducking, or trial by water, conducted during the witchcraft trials.
4.0 out of 5 stars
interesting,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Devil's Dominion: Magic and Religion in Early New England (Paperback)
When I read the first few pages I was not happy. All the authors' ideas appeared to be taken from a variety of texts found listed on the bottom of the page. A Summery? Not very inventive. But,as I had already sifted through pages and pages of potentially interesting books before deciding to buy this one, I thought I should at least finish it. It got much, Much better.When he starts talking about the nuts and bolts of New England beliefs, there actions and attitudes, it all becomes so clear. Why did the clergy dislike what they called 'witchcraft'? why did laypeople continue to practice it? What would possess a church member to go to a fortuneteller, or a diviner? Why would the Clergy issue a 'not guilty' verdict for two women who failed the devils mark test, the ducking test, and had verbal and spectral evidence against them? Unusual? No. It seems that most of what we are told about witchcraft and witch trials is a mixture of Europe and New England.-Mostly Europe as they are the more sensational of the two- When the two are separated it is evident they operate under different rules. So different, that what would be good enough to convict in Europe isn't enough to convict in New England. Both the later times and the Puritan religion play a major factor in this. So if you are looking for a book to help you out debate an average witch-know-it-all. this is one you probably want to read. It comes complete with statistics and conversations and, for those interested, it has some nice charts in the back listing all witch accusations for the 1640-1697, verdict included. A separate chart for the Salem/Andover witch trials, as you will find that this incident is was unique for a number of reasons thus deserves a separate explanation.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|