8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Just Wow, February 4, 2011
I was surprised by how much I got from this book. There is so much wisdom. I'm reading it again. I'm writing down favorite quotes and commentary. A great boost to my stoic studies. Very relevant to the kind of wisdom I'm looking for.
Introduction led me to think the Consolation of Marcia would be the stand-out but it was the weakest one for me, but happiness and tranquility... providence and shortness of life were all awesome! Read this until you wear it out.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Powerful advice, May 20, 2009
This review is from: Dialogues and Essays (Oxford World's Classics) (Paperback)
This is an excellent and practical guide to both life and philosophy. Highly recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
26 of 69 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
What an Old Windbag Seneca Was!, November 25, 2008
This review is from: Dialogues and Essays (Oxford World's Classics) (Paperback)
What a sycophant and poseur! I have no doubt, after reading about half of these dialogues and essays, that Seneca was the model for Polonius, and for every other mouther of platitudes in the European Renaissance. That was, you may know, the period of history when Seneca's reputation stood highest. I imagine all those Humanists, whose livelihood depended on cosiness with one egomaniacal condottiere or another, found a brotherhood in Seneca that blinded them to the man's essential shallowness. The silly syllogisms of a "stoic" who believed in "providence" couldn't have been convincing on their own terms to a mind like Machiavelli's or Pico della Mirandola's.
Nevertheless, it seems utterly arrogant to "rate" an ancient Roman philosopher - a link in the chain of intellectual history - so I'm awarding 5 stars to the translator John Davie and the editor Tobias Reinhardt for their excellent academic presentation.
I chose to read Seneca largely because of the problem of interpreting his role in the 17th C opera "L'Incoronazione di Poppea" by Claudio Monteverdi. In that opera, Seneca argues with his pupil/master Nero, and is ordered to commit suicide for his pains. The portrayal, like everything in Poppea, is ambiguous. The soldiers and servants deride Seneca as a greedy opportunist and hypocrite, while his followers cling to him like a messiah. Mercury brings him a message of appreciation from the Gods, and promises him a ringside seat at Olympus. If his stoicism is insincere, it doesn't show in the scene where the messenger from Nero tells him his fate, or in the lead-up to his off-stage suicide. The music at that point supports a heroic conception of the man, and requires utmost gravity in performance. Of course, suicide was a sin that no good Catholic of 1642 could condone, but who ever suspected that Monteverdi was a good Catholic?
It was his suicide , in the long run, that made Seneca's fame. "Nothing in his life became him like the leaving of it."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No