Customer Reviews


11 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (4)
1 star:
 (4)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A Good Resource for the PE Exam
I found the McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Engineering to be a valuable resource when taking the Chemical Engineering PE Exam (Principles & Practice of Engineering). Having this resource with me on Exam Day enabled me to bag several of the 80 questions that I probably would have missed otherwise.

The publication lists a lot of acromyms, many of which don't appear as...

Published on April 30, 2003 by James D. Peck

versus
40 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Looking for a PE Exam reference? Keep looking
I purchased this book for specific use on the PE Exam (an engineering dictionary is recommended) and was dismayed that NONE of the terms I looked up during the 8-hour test was in this book. The book is heavy into electronic/electrical terms and probably covers the mechanical arena as well, but for civil engineering terms, environmental processes, anything to do with...
Published on November 20, 2001 by Lin McGahan


‹ Previous | 1 2 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

40 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Looking for a PE Exam reference? Keep looking, November 20, 2001
By 
Lin McGahan (Truckee, CA United States) - See all my reviews
I purchased this book for specific use on the PE Exam (an engineering dictionary is recommended) and was dismayed that NONE of the terms I looked up during the 8-hour test was in this book. The book is heavy into electronic/electrical terms and probably covers the mechanical arena as well, but for civil engineering terms, environmental processes, anything to do with hydrology or water resources, this book is a loser. I do not recommend it unless you are taking the electrical or mechanical PE exam, or just wish to have a general reference handy in your office.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Let down, March 27, 2002
By A Customer
Not very helpful. Way too generic and focused on mechanical/electrical engineering. Being a civil engineer I don't find it very useful.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A Good Resource for the PE Exam, April 30, 2003
By 
James D. Peck (Springfield, Virginia United States) - See all my reviews
I found the McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Engineering to be a valuable resource when taking the Chemical Engineering PE Exam (Principles & Practice of Engineering). Having this resource with me on Exam Day enabled me to bag several of the 80 questions that I probably would have missed otherwise.

The publication lists a lot of acromyms, many of which don't appear as such in the index of Perry's Handbook, or in the indices of any of my textbooks.

Even if you decide it's not much good for anything else, it's still worth the purchase price just to have it with you on Test Day.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


10 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars DON'T BUY THIS BOOK, May 29, 2002
By 
Other web sites may praise this reference as a must for the PE exam, but I did not find any words in this book that would have helped me on the exam. ...
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Not for Civil Engineering., December 29, 2009
By 
Johnathan Limb (Anchorage, AK USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This book is terrible for civil engineering terms. I, too, bought this book to use on the PE exam and couldn't find a single term I needed in it. And over the past 5 years it has been on my shelf as reference guide, I still have yet to find a term defined in it for civil engineering. Really disappointing since I have some great textbooks published by McGraw-Hill on Water Resources and Environmental Engineering.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Not a Good Civil Engineering Dictionary, November 2, 2009
This review is from: Dictionary of Engineering (Second Edition) (Paperback)
I purchased this dictionary to take the PE Civil Test. It is the worst reference I have ever purchased. None of the terms I was looking for were in it. It may be good for other diciplines, but do not buy it for the Civil part of the Professional Engineer test!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Not for use on the PE exam, May 14, 2007
By 
This review is from: Dictionary of Engineering (Second Edition) (Paperback)
I purchased this book so I could use it on the Professional Engineering exam. This book did not provide the relevant definitions I was hoping it would have. I would reccomend looking for a different book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Only includes the most common engineering terms, May 25, 2006
This review is from: Dictionary of Engineering (Second Edition) (Paperback)
This dictionary contains many common terms, but if you are an engineer and are looking for a word you don't already know, you will not find it here. I bought this book to take with me for the PE exam, there were a few words on the exam that I was not familiar with, none of them were in this dictionary.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Not for Civil Engineering!!!, October 2, 2008
This review is from: Dictionary of Engineering (Second Edition) (Paperback)
The dictionary appears good enough for others, but not for Civil Engineers. The first four things I looked up weren't even listed ("plug flow," "wastewater," "footer," and "load bearing wall"). The definition for "effluent" is pretty poor as far as I'm concerned.

This will go up on the shelf, but I'll be surprised if gets used much. Glad it was less than $15!

For Civil Engineers it is 0 stars. I gave it 2 stars because other engineering fields may still find it useful.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars I gave my christmas present to myself!, December 23, 2007
By 
This review is from: Dictionary of Engineering (Second Edition) (Paperback)
Got my PE. PE PSI. Pounds per square inch that is! EZ Pass got an 81. U...
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 2 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Dictionary of Engineering (Second Edition)
Dictionary of Engineering (Second Edition) by McGraw-Hill (Paperback - January 27, 2003)
$19.95 $12.01
In Stock
Add to cart Add to wishlist