Customer Reviews


10 Reviews
5 star:
 (8)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


34 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars I never knew there were so many particles!
I've been studying Japanese for about 3 years and I'm approximately JLPT 2kyuu level. However, I was dumbfounded when I saw this book. Every page there's particles I never even knew existed. I mean you always learn the basic particles in school: wa, ga, de, ni, to, mo, made, kara, yo, ne, bakari, hodo, yori, etc. And you even learn how to combine particles for...
Published on March 6, 2004 by Zachary Turner

versus
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Fine, but there are better alternatives
This book covers more particles that Chino's How to Tell the Difference between Japanese Particles: Comparisons and Exercises book. So we can say that it is more advanced.

This book is pretty good. Standard alphabetical format. And some exercises in the back, but not so many. Quite good explanatory notes.

So why only three stars? (1) I just hate the...
Published 16 months ago by Jackal


Most Helpful First | Newest First

34 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars I never knew there were so many particles!, March 6, 2004
By 
Zachary Turner (San Francisco, CA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
I've been studying Japanese for about 3 years and I'm approximately JLPT 2kyuu level. However, I was dumbfounded when I saw this book. Every page there's particles I never even knew existed. I mean you always learn the basic particles in school: wa, ga, de, ni, to, mo, made, kara, yo, ne, bakari, hodo, yori, etc. And you even learn how to combine particles for compound particles: ni wa, ni mo, made ni, kara mo, just to name a few. But do you know what "made mo" is? In all the Japanese books I've ever seen, this has never even been given a mention. Did you know that "nite" was equivalent to "de" to mean the location where an action takes place? I'd never even HEARD of "nite". How about "kara shite"? I learned "tokoro de" to mean "by the way", but I had never even thought of the fact that perhaps "tokoro e", "tokoro ga", or "tokoro wo" existed. And they don't mean anything like what you might expect.

This book is a true gem.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


32 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Great book on Japanese particles, March 10, 2004
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
In some ways, particles are the key to Japanese grammar, which are one of the many ways Japanese differs from Indo-European languages like English. As the author points out, someone can have a very good grasp of nouns and verb conjugations in Japanese, and yet without particles, still can't construct a grammatical Japanese sentence. And by using two different particles, two sentences that are otherwise the same can be made to mean totally different things.

The definition portion of the book discusses all the particle meanings, giving main as well as variant meanings. There are lots of example sentences, which are in both Roman transliteration and Japanese script. Another helpful aid is the 12 x 14 table of particles in blue in the front and end papers of the book, which is very convenient. At 340 pages long, there is a lot of material here considering it's not that expensive a book.

In the grammar discussion section, the author shows why you just can't replace the prepositions in an English sentence with the particles in Japanese. For example, take the sentence, "My mother and my father had dinner at a restaurant in Tokyo with a friend," which is Watashi NO haha TO chichi WA tomodachi TO issho NI tookyoo NO resuturan DO yuushoku O tabe-mashita in Japanese (the particles are in all caps). This sentence contains 8 particles serving various functions and only two prepositions, so obviously they aren't equivalent.

Particles can serve many different functions, ranging from altering the meaning of the verb to functions that resemble case-marking in Indo-European and other Ural- Altaic languages. The Negara particle indicates that the action described by the verb it follows is being carried out at the same time as another action is taking place. The English approximation is "while doing" or "also doing," as in Boku WA ongaku o, kiki negara doraibu o shita, which means, "I was listening to music while I drove."

Other interesting particles include Tara, which indicates the subject or topic of the sentence, similar to the case marking in so-called Active languages, as opposed to the Nominative-Accusative pattern in English in most Indo-European languages, or the Ergative-Absolutive pattern found in Eskimo, Caucasian languages, south Pacific island and Austronesian languages, and so on. (Basque is also an ergative language, but is the only one in Europe that is.) Then there is the Nite particle, which is placed after a noun of location, which shows where an action took place. This also seems similar to the locative case in many languages, although technically Japanese lacks cases. To give one final example, the TO particle performs a listing function and is used when naming things in succession.

Since Japanese has no case structure and all but two of the verbs are completely regular, Japanese lacks many of the difficulties encountered in other languages. Compared to Indo-European patterns, it isn't very rich in verb forms that deal with time, and it even lacks a true future tense (which Latin does too, interestingly enough). However, it makes up for this in it's variety of modal constructions which indicate the speaker's attitude toward the subject, possibility, probability, conditionality, and so on, and in the complex particle system. This book will help you master this extremely important aspect of Japanese grammar.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Kodansha's Japanese Particle dictionary, June 22, 2000
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
I love this book! Whenever I'm in Japan, I carry it with me as I find it even more handy than my dictionary. Plenty of example sentences. Particles arranged in alphabetical order.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars This book is absolutely perfect., April 13, 2005
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
You cannot make progress, let alone master this language, without proper comprehension of particles and their rules and exceptions. This book is an indispensable companion for any student. The book simply explodes with information, including many good example sentences, concise usage explanations, and quick-reference sections with english equivalents and review exercises.

You should have this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Fine, but there are better alternatives, October 25, 2010
By 
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
This book covers more particles that Chino's How to Tell the Difference between Japanese Particles: Comparisons and Exercises book. So we can say that it is more advanced.

This book is pretty good. Standard alphabetical format. And some exercises in the back, but not so many. Quite good explanatory notes.

So why only three stars? (1) I just hate the alphabetical organisation and (2) This book is better A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. It is a general grammar, but covers the same ground, but in a bit more academic/structured manner.

However, if you for some reason just want a book focusing on particles, you can get this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars She is my teacher at Hunter College, January 27, 2008
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
Eight years after the last person who posted about Kawashima-sensei being their professor, here I am posting because she is my professor this year at Hunter College, three times a week. She is wonderful, and so is her dictionary of particles which she often refers to in class. She has us read the chapter on each particle we learn, and it is certainly enjoyable with all its lovely illustrations (drawn by Kawashima-sensei!) and is very detailed in it's information. A very good dictionary of particles by a wonderful teacher and author.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Great!!!, September 5, 2009
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
This book is simply great for all levels in Japanese. The explanation is thorough and the examples are very useful. Especially for those who are serious about learning Japanese, get this book!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Great and necessary book on particles, December 7, 2008
By 
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
I can speak fluent Japanese, am slowly working my way towards being able to read a newspaper, and yet particles still haunt me.

I often confuse "ni" and "de," "wo" and "ga," just to give a couple of examples.

This book has many great features.

At the beginning of the book is a quick refernce guide to all of the particles covered.

The book has a colored alphabetical index which runs along the edge of the pages so you can find you place in the book very quickly.

The sample sentences are written using both romaji and kanji meaning that a beginner can use it as well as more advanced students.

There are little cartoons illustrating examples throughout the text making it much easier and fun to read.

There are exercises but they are at the END of the book, not clogging up the main content. Once you finish an exercise you pretty much don't need to refernce it again (some may) so it's much better to have them at the end or in a separate book.

One nitpick about the book is that the author uses the word "kisha" for train throughout the book. This word refers to a steam train and obviously isn't used anymore. I made the mistake in the past asking someone from Japan how long it took them to get to Tokyo by "kisha." They had a good chuckle.

Recommended for all students of Japanese.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


14 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Very good, but not in-depth enough., July 19, 2005
A Kid's Review
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
I may be 13 years old, but I have been studying Japanese for about 10 months. Yet I already know about 340 kanji, can write kana almost as well as english, and already studied particles from a previous book. The book I previously used was barely in-depth at all. I had so many questions that I couldnt have answers to. So I came on Amazon to look for a better book. I saw this book, read the reviews, and got it.

I bought this book about a month ago, and when I first bought it and looked at it I thought it was awesome. However, the more I read in this book, I had more questions than answers. This book covers the basic particles wonderfully and deeply, but it lacks in some details with other particles. Like the difference between "made" and "kiri" to translate into the word 'just' and so on and so forth. This book is great to begginners, but I dont recommend it to people who want and in-depth study into particles.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars She is my teacher!!, September 7, 2000
By 
Tyga Maclin (New York, NY USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition) (Paperback)
This book is outstanding. It has helped me tremendously. Combine this book with a Japanese dictionary and you've got just about everything you need to excel in your studying of the Japanese language. Also, as an added benefit, she happens to be my teacher. She is an excellent teacher and one of the best teachers I've ever had the pleasure of being a student under. She exemplifies what it is to be a teacher. So pick up this book and look out for her next book, "Doctor In My Pocket."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

A Dictionary of Japanese Particles (A Kodansha Dictionary) (English and Japanese Edition)
$22.00 $14.66
In Stock
Add to cart Add to wishlist