Most Helpful Customer Reviews
102 of 106 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Well Research and Detailed, April 14, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: Dictionary of Symbolism: Cultural Icons and the Meanings Behind Them (Paperback)
I purchased this book along with "The Encyclopedia of Symbolism" by Kevin Todeschi. While "Encyclopedia" was a huge disappointment (see that review) this book more than made up for it. It's easy to use as there's an Index of all included words in the back and a pictorial index of symbols and icons. The book covers all you would expect with many drawings. I was surprised by the level of depth and detail given for meanings to include historic facts and elaborate definitions. You probably won't find everything you're looking for in here but what it does offer is well done.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
38 of 39 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A wonderful, comprehensive resource!, July 7, 2003
This review is from: Dictionary of Symbolism: Cultural Icons and the Meanings Behind Them (Paperback)
I refer to the Dictionary of Symbolism so often that I always keep it close at hand. It is a wonderful resource for anyone interested in mythology, Jungian dream analysis, biblical symbolism, cross-cultural meanings and myths, the history of symbols, etc. This is no simple listing of symbolic meanings -- it is a substantial book with extensive information on each entry, very often with illustrations. For example, someone mentioned the "Chicken Little" story recently, and I looked up the word "hen." There I found an entry describing both the positive and negative symbolism of hens as protective mothers and also as foolish, confused birds, with two illustrations and information from Matthew, Africa and Europe. I was surprised to find so much. On the same day I looked up Prometheus, Mercury and "rock." Not only are the entries detailed, but there are an enormous number of them. The index at the back is a great cross-listing. Unfortunately, for every symbol in the universe to be listed, there would need to be several volumes. But for a single volume, this one is pretty comprehensive.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
30 of 33 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Okay book--if you don't have an alternative, March 17, 2007
I ordered this book from Amazon along with two other dictionaries of symbols. I like this one the least. While it seems to be relatively thorough, it had misinformation (or, to put it kindly, "ambiguous and incomplete language") and bias in the first two entries I looked up. This dictionary says that Joan of Arc "died by the sword" (without the quotes). Everyone knows she was burned at the stake. If the author was being figurative, he should have been more careful, esp. when he doesn't elaborate on Joan's actual history. Second, under "sword" he states that because Genesis describes an angel posted at the gate of the Garden of Eden "with a flaming sword," and swords weren't invented then (traditionally, 4,000 BC), this shows that "the Biblical account does not date from the era it describes." This is an astoundingly stupid statement, especially from someone who presumably specializes in historic research. By definition, ALL history is written after the events that took place, especially accounts (or myths) set in pre-history. Plus, the sword in question is wielded by an angel, a supernatural figure not constrained by time or human (physical/geological) limitations.
This author also says that the Japanese short sword, the wakizashi, was used for ritual suicide. Maybe, sometimes. But usually it was the tanto, or long knife that was used for sepeku.
Buy Jack Tresidder,'s "Complete Dictionary of Symbols" instead. It has the same number of entries (2000), but is about 60 pages longer. It has a much more attractive layout, very useful cross-referencing and specially highlighted "boxed" articles. More important, it also footnotes many of its key sources--something Biedermann doesn't bother with.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|