Trade in your item
Get a $1.76
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

A Different Approach to Cosmology: From a Static Universe through the Big Bang towards Reality Hardcover – March 13, 2000

ISBN-13: 978-0521662239 ISBN-10: 0521662230 Edition: 1st

13 New from $34.00 22 Used from $20.88
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$34.00 $20.88
Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Frequently Bought Together

A Different Approach to Cosmology: From a Static Universe through the Big Bang towards Reality + The Static Universe: Exploding the Myth of Cosmic Expansion
Buy the selected items together

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 369 pages
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press; 1 edition (March 13, 2000)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0521662230
  • ISBN-13: 978-0521662239
  • Product Dimensions: 10 x 7.2 x 1.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.5 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,697,730 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Scientific American

For modern readers, raised on 1984 and Kurt Cobain, anything that smacks of the mainstream arouses suspicion. So after every cosmology article in Scientific American, editors brace for an onslaught of letters demanding that alternatives to conventional theories be given their due. This book describes the best-developed such alternative: the quasi-steady-state theory, the latest incarnation of the steady-state theory that Fred Hoyle first devised in 1948. It argues that the famous cosmic microwave background radiation is diffuse starlight rather than the afterglow of a hot big bang; that stars synthesized the chemical elements usually attributed to the bang; and that matter is continuously created and ejected from the cores of galaxies. The heterodoxy is seductive. But in a commentary in the April 1999 issue of Physics Today, cosmologist Andreas Albrecht outlined the failings of the theory and the tests it would need to pass before being taken seriously by most cosmologists. If nothing else, a critical reading of this book shows that "mainstream" isn't such a dirty word after all. Science is tricky. Seemingly plausible ideas can have subtle flaws, and it takes a collective effort of problem solving to find them out.

Review

"Professor Sir Fred Hoyle, Britain's greatest living astrophysicist...launches his most comprehensive attack against the Big Bang theory, in a book with the archly subversive title A Different Approach to Cosmology...when Hoyle makes a cosmic pronouncement, it is invariably worth hearing...Together with two other respected astrophysicists, Hoyle systematically reviews the evidence for the Big Bang theory, and gives it a good kicking...it's hard not to be impressed with the audacity of the demolition job...I can only hope that I possess one-thousandth of Hoyles' fighting spirit when I, like him, have reached my 85th year." The Sunday Telegraph

"The writing style is lively and personal, and the scientific arguments are written in such a way as to be accessible to upper-division undergraduate students in physics and astrophysics. The book is very well referenced and illustrated with suitable and approproate illustrations. Recommended for upper-division undergraduates, graduate students, and two-year technical program students." Choice

"This is a fascinating book, expressing the views of three scientists who choose to go against the conventional cosmological wisdom. It is extremely important for such skepticism to exist and for such books to be written." Physics Today

"The book is a serious and professional contribution to scientific cosmology." Sky & Telescope

"Throughout the last few decades, Fred Hoyle, Geoffrey Burbidge, and Jayant Narlikar have done the cosmology community a great service by developing and defending a serious alternative to Big Bang models of cosmic origins. A Different Approach to Cosmology is a summary of their work...by elucidating one of the hot Big Bang's competitors, the authors provide a good educational exercise for any graduate student interested in fundamental cosmology." Science

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
5 star
8
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
1
See all 9 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

56 of 60 people found the following review helpful By LG on March 22, 2000
Format: Hardcover
Sir Fred Hoyle and fellow authors, Geoffrey Burbidge and Jayant Narlikar show why the paradigm debates in modern cosmology ended too soon! Their sweeping analysis includes the early static universe concepts, the Einstein, de Sitter, and Friedmann-Lemaitre relativistic models, the controversy of the classic Steady-State vs. the Big Bang, and the contemporary Big Bang paradigm. As participants, they discuss the controversies over interpretation of the Hubble velocity-distance relation, light element origins, the radio sources and their fabled distributions, the quasars, the cosmic microwave background, and large-scale matter distribution.
They summarize the accumulating evidences for intrinsic-peculiar redshifts, and ejection of compact X-ray and optical sources from active galactic nuclei. The Big Bang is found wanting both in theoretical assumption and observationally. Building on their Quasi-Steady-State cosmology, the authors propose that both observation and scale-invariant gravitational equations require us to consider an ongoing-episodic creation of matter within the universe. . . .
Don't let prevailing theory (or episodic mathematical equations) keep you from reading this important book!
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
42 of 46 people found the following review helpful By Brakaway on April 16, 2000
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
A rare and well balanced scientific discussion of the relative merits of the new Quasi Steady State versus Big Bang concept of the Universe. This book gives the reader a feel for the basis of our understanding of the Universe. A feeling for the vast uncertainties concerning our interpretation of distant objects, such as Quasars.
Please note: This book is for serious students of cosmology. The authors presume the reader has an understanding of general relativity.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Babak Makkinejad on July 7, 2013
Format: Paperback
In all fields of human endeavor, one must exhibit a commitment to the Truth in that arena. It is in that spirit that this book is written, it is a search for discovering a more truthful cosmological model of the observable universe.

The first 12 chapters of this book is a trenchant analysis of the existing observational evidence in support of the standard Big Bang model as well its critique.

The authors then review the Friedman solution and proceed with a brief discussion of the standard cosmological model - the Big Bang model - which is followed by a discussion of the (Quasi)-Steady-State cosmological model and its observational ramifications (chapters 15, to 21).

[There is a one-page exposition of the Steady-State model in the book "Tensors, Relativity, and Cosmology" by Eric A Lord that I found useful.]

Overall, I believe that the authors have done a decent job of making a strong case for the (Quasi)-Steady-State cosmological model as an Big Bang model and the (Quasi)-Steady-State model suffer from the fact that they require new and hitherto unobserved fields. In the Big Bang model, that would be the Inflation field and in the (Quasi)-Steady-State model, the creation field. Clearly, the observations cannot be explained by the known physics - new physics has to be invented to account for the observations.

There is one major difference between the 2 models from a physical point of view: the (Quasi)-Steady-State model has the merit of respecting the Principle of the Conservation of Energy.

I note here that the intrinsic Redshift of the Quasars may be caused by the so-called Wolf effect (Emil Wolf et al., Redshifts and blueshifts of spectral lines caused by source correlations" (1987) Optics Communications 62: 12--16. Mark F.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Rick M. on March 26, 2010
Format: Paperback
First, Ignore the 1-star review. That reviewer does not know what this book is about & probably never read it. The other reviews are by people who did read it, thoughtfully. Any person interested in cosmology & in how science should be done will find this book clear & gripping. It does use the equations of (e. g.) Relativity in reasoning about the Universe, but always with clear verbal treatment, too. I have no training in mathematical physics, but gained insight into how formulas & equations are used in cosmology by scanning thru their presentation! Above all, this book provides a fine critical account of cosmological studies from the early 20th C. to its end, with emphasis on where good scientific practice has or has not been used. The problems they find have only worsened & spread in the 10 years since the book was written, which makes it's content even more essential. Finally, all 3 authors are tops in astronomy & are excellent writers. I hope the paperback edition will be reprinted at a nice low price so anyone can own a copy of this important book.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
25 of 38 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on February 27, 2003
Format: Hardcover
Having read what the other gentlements said about the book. I have not much to say. It pretty much gives a better cosmological model for our Universe than the standart model for it brings commum sense and simple logic back to the field. However, I would like to comment a sentence wrote by the Scientific American editors:
"Seemingly plausible ideas can have subtle flaws, and it takes a collective effort of problem solving to find them out."
I wonder that what is going on with mainstream Science nowadays is even worse than I thought. It look likes they assume that standart models can NOT possible be wrong and that any other models MUST fail in order to keep the standart one.
Plausible ideas are the BEST ideas in Science. Of course it still can have flaws, but as they pointed out, the flaws are often subtle. But in the illogical and nonsensical big-bang model, the flaws are OBVIOUS. Also, if you read this book or "Seeing Red" by Alton Harp or "Dark Matter, missing planets and new comets" by Tom V. Flandern, you will find out (in spite of what the Scientific American are trying to tell you) that in fact the standart model IS durty.
I strongly recommend this book because I have found a logical truth and I'd like you find it by yourself as well: The Universe is infinity in space and time and the so-called Big-Bang actually NEVER happened.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again