Dilemmas: The Tarner Lectures 1953 [Paperback]

Gilbert Ryle (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: January 1, 1954 | ISBN-10: 0521091152 | ISBN-13: 978-0521091152

I did something yesterday, so it was true a thousand years ago that I was going to do it. Could I help it, then? Professor Ryle shows that I could; he also shows that a dilemma like this starts with a slender base - the question whether statements in the future can be true - and opens out before one notices it into questions like 'is it worthwhile learning to swim?' In his second demonstration Professor Ryle proves that Achilles will after all overtake his tortoise and will not have to pursue it through all eternity. These two puzzles were classic if academic examples of the dilemmas Professor Ryle is concerned with. Common sense tells me that I can to some extent control my life; should I then, faced with an apparently logical argument for fatalism, reject common sense? Again, because I enjoy or dislike things, are all my actions due to the seeking of pleasure and the avoidance of pain? Because my eyes and ears tell me one set of things about the world and science tels me another, am I to think my senses less reliable or accurate than science? Professor Ryle's aim is to arbitrate between these pairs of theories which compete for our allegiance, and to show that the either/or which they seem to insist on is a false dilemma. It may lead to mere muddle, or to a more subtle confusion; either way these tugs-of-war between conflicting theories may bring the ordinary man either to confused or wrong action or to intellectual apathy.

Editorial Reviews

Review

'The great merit of this book is that it grasps philosophical problems at that critical stage when they are just casting off their connexions with everyday life, just about to launch on their long academic flight, and that it attempts to deal with them then and there, before they can become airborne. Brisk, homely and almost practical, it really challenges everyone to try to be his own philosopher ... the peculiar, penetrating simplicity of this kind of philosophy is exceedingly hard to achieve.' Times Literary Supplement

Book Description

Examines the pairs of theories which compete for every man's allegiance, and shows that the either/or which they seem to insist on is in fact a false dilemma.

Product Details

• Paperback: 136 pages
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press (January 1, 1954)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0521091152
• ISBN-13: 978-0521091152
• Product Dimensions: 8.3 x 5.4 x 0.4 inches
• Shipping Weight: 5.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,380,984 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Dilemmas of our own making, January 27, 2001

By 

D. S. Heersink "D. Stephen Heersink" (San Francisco) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Dilemmas: The Tarner Lectures 1953 (Paperback)

Philosophy has spent the better part of its history spinning its wheels with little traction in answering some of the most perplexing and provocate issues about life. Then came Wittengenstein and the only person Wittgenstein believed truly understood his work, Gilbert Ryle (Elizabeth Anscombe should also be considered, but only Ryle is mentioned by name.) Ryle's most successful and enduring book is "Concept of Mind," which does much if not all of debunking nearly all philosophy from Descartes to date with wit, style, and grace. "Dilemmas" is a different sort of book, and in my opinion, the more enjoyable of the two. First, it's considerably shorter. Second, it goes to the heart of dilemmas that have perplexed agile and senile minds for centuries. It takes into consideration about five seemingly irresolvable problems and demonstrates how these dilemmas are neither a dilemma nor even challenging dilemmas.

It what is clearly one of the best books on "deconstructing" problems that are artificial and mind games, and demonstrating how using language in its ordinary, not extraordinary, ways, Ryle shows how many philosophical problems are nothing of the sort. They are problems of language, not true problems of substance. Anyone who asks a stupid question will get a stupid answer, but Ryle goes beyond this platitude. He takes several very perplexing issues that have haunted philosophy from its nascent stages and debunks them through the use of "ordinary language." No linguistic acrobatics of the existentialist ilk, no grand metaphysics of the Scholastic ilk, no analytical positivism according to the Austrian ilk -- all of which have lead nowhere, but, instead, a refreshing reexamination of the dilemmas themselves, and clear-headed, simply examined, ordinary explanation of things in an ordinary way.

This ingenious little book is not a tome of how the world looks, but is what philosophers call "techne", or "art," of how to dissolve problems that do not exist. Ryle doesn't ask and answer every question posed since the beginning of the world; rather, he takes a few isolated, but well-worked problems, and artfully and clearly shows how these "problems" aren't problems at all. They are confusions originating in linguistic abuse. Using five examples, he assumes that the reader can take with him the technique and apply it to other irrestible problems that really don't exist at all. Not that every philosophical question is a chimera in linguistic clothing, but that a substantial bulk of them are just that. In an entertaining, amusing, and charming way, Ryle uses his "techne" on five such irrestible problems and shows how they are solved. He leaves it to the reader to go from there.

There are a great many good books about ordinary language philosophy, but few match the stature and eloquence of Ryle's "Dilemmas." J. L. Austin appears confused and convulated compared to Ryle, whose technique is what we learn, and in the process bring fresh insight to old problems that aren't all that problematic after all.

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars More Category Mistakes, May 10, 2002

By 

miles@riverside (Indio, CA United States) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Dilemmas: The Tarner Lectures 1953 (Paperback)

In this short (129 pages) book, Ryle applies his idea of the Category Mistake to 7 thought-problems:

1) Fatalism: If I sneezed this morning, then was it true 1000 years ago that I would sneeze this morning?
2) Achilles and the Tortoise: The famous Zeno paradox where Achilles can never quite catch up, because the tortoise had a head start.
3) Pleasure: I can have an acute, throbbing pain behind my eyeballs, but can I have an acute, throbbing pleasure there?
4) The World of Science and the Everyday World: Which (if either) do we mean when we speak of "the real world"?
5) Technical and Untechnical Concepts: If the Queen of Hearts acts as part of a Royal Flush when I play Poker, then is it the same card when I use it as a trump in Bridge?
6) Perception: Sometimes I see words on a page, but other times I can also see spelling errors in the words. Which perception is more real?
7) Formal and Informal Logic: Mathematics is more consistent and precise than philosophy, so we want philosophy to be more like mathematics ... right?

Gilbert Ryle was the greatest at showing how our use of language affects our thinking. I can recommend this book to people who have never read him before because of the book's brevity and because of its colorful range of subjects.

0 of 23 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Ho Humm!, January 18, 1999

By A Customer

This review is from: Dilemmas: The Tarner Lectures 1953 (Paperback)

Gilbert Ryle's philosophical pamphlet "Dilemmas" is enlightening, but somewhat perplexing. The grandiloquent claims on the back cover draw you in and start you reading, but by the eleventh page I found myself with an almighty headache! Congratulations to the authour on attempting to simplify such a complex subject (namely Determinism), but it is a task which I feel is well nigh impossible! One day I will attempt to read it cover to cover. In the meantime, I will grapple with my own views on a Newtonian universe