Following the hilariously self-mocking foreword by Joel and Ethan Coen (which eliminates any possibility of the book being labeled stodgy or high-falutin), Andrews admits in the introduction that his selection process was difficult. He focuses on only those directors with a "recognizably distinctive visual style," and the selected stills are those that are "somehow representative of the filmmaker in question, which is not the same as saying it is the most beautifully visual image (let alone the most familiar) from his or her finest or most famous film."
In addition to the meticulously chosen stills, Andrew's text demands your involvement in the picture. He begins each explanation with a description of the shot: "Sex, violence, fear: a chanteuse has forced an innocent youth she's found watching her from the closet to strip and make love to her at knifepoint; but is someone now watching them?" Continuing his analysis, he illustrates how this scene fits into the director's vision for the film, and how it relates to his or her complete body of work. Insightful, incisive, and intelligent, Andrew makes clear to movie fans what skilled directors must know in their very being--if one picture paints a thousand words, a film is capable of millions. --Brangien Davis
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Opinionated and certainly not a 'concise guide', but fun.,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Director's Vision: A Concise Guide to the Art of 250 Great Filmmakers (Paperback)
This book is by no means what it is advertised as: it's not a "concise guide" to the art of 250 directors, it doesn't tell you "how the world's greatest filmmakers create their spellbinding visions" and "the secrets behind their unique styles." In fact, it's rather misguided in my opinion because it uses auteur theory and assumes that the director is the one who creates the entire picture contained in the movie frame, as though the he or she is the "painter" of an entire film's moving image; but in fact a very large part of what goes into the frame is done by the cinematographer, the production designer, and many other people. It surprises me because I don't even think the word "cinematographer" is mentioned even once in the whole book, yet the cinematographer often puts at least as much work into a film's visuals as a director, if not more. The author of this book is also quite opinionated and really ticks me off sometimes when he bashes some of my favorite directors, claiming that their work is "half-baked humanism" and "insubstantial" while giving no real reasons to support his claims because he's only got half a page to tell us about the director, his life, his visual style, and his films.On the other hand, though, this book is a blast to just flip through. I haven't heard of a lot of the directors in this book, and often one of the half-page frame grabs alone has made me want to go out and get one of a director's films from my local library. Indeed, a lot of great directors such as War-Kai Wong, Takeshi Kitano, Nicholas Roeg, and Krystof Kieslowski were introduced to me through this book, mainly through the stunning visuals of their movie stills; I actually don't value the text very much because of its heavily biased, opinionated nature, and the fact that sometimes the descriptions give spoilers for the films they describe, which is a shame for the films that I haven't seen yet. Rather, if I see a frame I'm really interested in, I'll briefly read the text for some basic information, and then go to the IMDB (Internet Movie Database) for a more objective view of the filmmaker's work. Anyways, don't get this book if you really want "a concise guide to the art of 250 filmmakers;" *do* get this book if you just want to flip through the pages and see some of the most beautiful images you've ever laid your eyes on, and find out about some amazing directors you may have never heard of. Just make sure you take the author's opinions with a very big grain of salt.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A great minipedia for directors,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Director's Vision: A Concise Guide to the Art of 250 Great Filmmakers (Paperback)
This is an impressive study on a lot of different directors. It's well written, intelligent, and concise, and the Coen Brothers' foreword is a hoot. Still, I can't help thinking of those who didn't make the cut: Miyazake, Alex Proyas, Anthony Minghella, Ang Lee, Rob Reiner, Richard Donner and those that were questionable choices (Joe Dante? Are you kidding me?). I'm really hoping for a sequel to this book. Also there's probably going to be controversy about the scenes and movie selections. I really enjoy when the author goes into the actual technical details of the frames, such as the Blade Runner shot, yet there are times when judgements are too focussed on the filmmaker's career. But it makes a great conversation piece and gets the dialogue of film going. There are no easy answers in this book. Only information that generates excitement, wonder and interest. This is a film fan's book.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Picture Saves a Thousand Words,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Director's Vision: A Concise Guide to the Art of 250 Great Filmmakers (Paperback)
When I got this book, I was disappointed in the lack of text. I would have preferred less directors and more exposition. Still, I come back to it time and again for the beautiful photographs. For that reason, I would have give in four stars but for one fatal defect. THIS BOOK IS FULL OF SPOILERS! IMO, it is a crime to give away the ending of a movie like "The Bicycle Thief" to name only the most egregious example. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|