13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Book's Strength and Weakness Is in Its Details, February 3, 2001
This review is from: Disaster in Korea: The Chinese Confront MacArthur (Texas A & M University Military History) (Hardcover)
Roy Appleman started working on this book when he was a combat historian in the US Army during the Korean War and continued into the 80s. By examining military records and interviewing many of the participants at all levels, he brings a great deal of detail to bear on a narrow focus: the experiences of the United States Eighth Army (with attached Turkish, British, and South Korean units) in the Korean War from November 24th, 1950 to December 26th,1950.
That detail can be mindnumbing at times, especially for a life-long civilian like me. A large portion of this book is taken up with such details as when x platoon detached from Company Y to occupy Hill Z. Appleman tries to be as clear as possible and substitutes organizing his history around units for a straight chronological telling of events. On occasion, he stops to remind us what is happening elsewhere simultaneous to the events he is covering or backtracks to place things in context. There are plenty of maps, many of them detailed, but the book could have used even more.
The book doesn't start to get really interesting until about half way through when Appleman takes up the harrowing retreat of the 2nd Infantry Division from Kunu-ri. This account, even more than the rest of the book, is drawn from post-combat interviews since most of the official records were lost. It tells of an approximately six mile retreat, done by some units at night in subzero temperatures, down a narrow road while under enemy fire from both sides. It is an example of confused command, bad coordination between units, and courage and cowardice.
After the retreat from Kunu-ri, we get the details of Operation Bug-Out, its unofficial title in some quarters, when the UN forces fled approximately 300 miles south of their most northernly positions in Korea.
All this detail, while boring at times, is sometimes quite informative to those unacquainted with the details of military logistics. I gleaned, in passing, some understanding of how advances and retreats are planned, the intricacies of the quartermaster's work, and the coordination of artillery support with the infantry.
As you would expect from the author of the US Army's offical history of the first five months of the Korean War, this book is also partially intended as a case study for professional military men. Appleman criticizes the actions of everyone from the Joint Chiefs of Staff and MacArthur to the behavior of privates. He restates the frequent criticism that MacArthur's notion of reunifying Korea was foolish. Korea's border with China was unpatrollable by the forces MacArthur had to say nothing of his misreading of Chinese intention and capabilities. The Joint Chiefs of Staff should have denied MacArthur permission to advance to the Chinese border. Appleman also notes a general lack of ground reconnaisance to scout out the disposition of Chinese forces before and after their second offensive. It was failure to maintain contact with the enemy which was partially responsible for the decision not to form a defensive line at the waist of Korea in December 1950 even though the Chinese did not, indeed could not, follow the retreating forces.
On the mid-levels of command, Appleman also notes problems. In the withdrawal from Kunu-ri, Colonel Freeman's controversial decision not to perform a rearguard action for the retreating column is covered. Appleman sees it as a breakdown in coordination and the chain of command. Appleman also notes how General Walker had units in reserve but did not use them in a northward attack to clear the Chinese roadblock between Sunchon and Kunu-ri. He mentions, but has no explanation for, the British Middlesex Battalion's failure to support the retreat as ordered.
On the lowest levels, Appleman notes a general lack of discipline, with some notable exceptions, about maintaining supplies and equipment and also armor units failing to support infantry in clearing Chinese from the sides of the Kunu-ri-Sunchon road.
Appleman also stresses that his account corrects two misconceptions in the history of the Korean War. Chinese General Lin Piao, a legendary figure from the Long March, did not lead troops in the second Chinese offensive of the war, and the Chinese did not exploit a gap between the Eighth Army and the X Corps. Rather, they punched a whole in the front and exploited it.
Military professionals and veterans of the events covered should find this book valueable. Casual readers of military history will find parts slow going, but the book should ultimately reward their attention.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Brings clarity to the chaotic retreat of the Eighth Army fro, October 19, 1998
This review is from: Disaster in Korea: The Chinese Confront MacArthur (Texas A & M University Military History) (Hardcover)
The Eighth Army's retreat from Northwest Korea after the invasion of the Chinese Army in 1950 is a difficult event to understand because of the simultaneous occurrence of many interconnected battles. Appleman's treatment of these events brings clarity to the overall picture, and brings into sharp relief the command failures and inconsistencies which exacerbated the defeat of U.S. forces. Unanswered in Appleman's detailed treatment, however, is the question of why the Eighth Army failed to carry out its declared intention to establish a defensive line north of Pyongyang. Instead, the Army seemed to lose all coherence and fall back in a panicked rush until it was well below the 38th parallel, long after it had lost contact with the advancing Chinese. Appleman's harsh evaluation of Col. Paul Freeman's decision to withdraw his regiment by the coast road is also somewhat controversial, although I must say that after reading Appleman's account of the sequence of events it is hard to disagree with his conclusion.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Stunning bit of staggering research brings memories to life!, February 19, 2009
This is NOT a book for any but serious students of History, be they professional or serious Amateurs. It DEMANDS attention to; retention of and ability to recreate the profound complexities and the considerable ineptness of military and civilian leadership, (more likely the lack thereof), which accounts for the massive casualty counts in a War so much shorter than Viet Nam. Leaders who stuck their proverbial 'heads in the sand' rather than face facts, failing in leadership, resulting in loss of countless American lives, along with the enormous, unconscionable reluctance of Constituted Authorities to hold accountable, the hugh EGOS of McArthur and Almond! The denial of overwhelming evidence of the extent of Chinese Military intervention into North Korea, approaches no less than incompetence; it is staggeringly documented! McArthur's intrusion into U.S. Foreign Policy matters along with the REFUSAL to accept and comply with one of the virtual pillars of our very Constitution, namely, that THE PRESIDENT of The U.S. is the Commander-in-Chief of the Military which must remain UNDER Civilian control. It is almost impossible to believe how close AMERICAN involvement in Korea didn't end disasterously, so ill-prepared were we to engage, seriously, such formidable opposition!
This is a virtual 'SLEDGEHAMMER" of a 'blow-by-blow' reconstruction of what could well have been a debacle; one so much worse than the unprecedented ROUT of the entire 8th Army, as IT almost ran from the enemy, in what may well be the worst defeat, in American Military
History. Hard as it may be, this book MUST BE READ AND DONE SO WITH ABSOLUTE CONCENTRATION AND ATTENTION; I consider it that important an accounting of the Korean War! I shall be reading it yet again, very soon. It was almost painful to just read, so authoritively was this book written! IT PULLS NO PUNCHES!!!!
Jim Girzone
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
