8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Most disappointing publication of any work I've ever read, October 12, 2010
This publication is unacceptably limited in content.
1) It does not include any of Rousseau's footnotes, which are critical to a more complete understanding his arguments.
2) It does not include the original date of publication.
3) It does not include his Dedication to Geneva.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Man, Animal -- Manimal!, September 17, 2003
This review is from: Discourse on the Origin of Inequality (The World's Classics) (Paperback)
This essay was Rousseaus's submission to the Academy of Dijon contest, entitled, "Has the progress of the arts and sciences contributed more to the corruption or purification of morals?".
This text is his story about Nature, and Society, and the scandal that happens when people come together, build, divide, dance, sing, and compare themselves with one another. In many ways, it is his answer to the problem of evil.
Natural man is, in many ways, good, because his needs are immediately felt and immediately fulfilled. Social man begins to compete, to hoard, and to use cunning to enslave his fellows, to gain their esteem, take their property, and sometimes their lives.
His picture of the natural man is half what we think of an "animal" and half the "human" that we recognize in ourselves. He shifts his description as the flow of arguement dictates. The habitual provocateur, Rousseau - watch him!
In a way, he is rewriting the Christian "Creation Myth". In his version, evil does not originate at that moment when man eats the fruit of the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" --to "be like God"; it happens when Adam wants a better apple than Eve's got for herself. Before society develops as we know it, Adam would have been fine with just a pear.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The garden of eden, August 10, 2000
I find Rousseau especially creative in the way he describes how inequality progressed from the time the first humans made contact. He makes a good case for the solitary life. I think Rousseau believes it is destructive whenever humans come together in groups. Governments were formed to protect the weaker from the stronger or as Rousseau thinks to actually protect the rich from the poor. This is an outstanding book. It will haunt you.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No