Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing end to a great trilogy, May 23, 2007
Until a few years ago, British and American SF novels were very different animals, each informed by a different culture, and each appealing to different tastes. Then, for whatever reason, around the turn of the century the British Invasion of fantastic SF took America by storm, breaking through the previous reluctance of Americans to embrace SF writers from the UK. Authors like Alastair Reynolds, Charles Stross and Tony Ballantyne burst onto the scene with fresh new ideas and perspectives. The first two novels of Ballantyne's trilogy were among those great British Invasion novels, interesting and fun, and leaving the reader wanting more.
However, this is not the novel one would have hoped for to finish the trilogy. Not much actually happens in it; it's more a novel of characters. But the characters are, by and large, ciphers; for all the time we spend with them, only a couple take on any real personality. The first two-thirds of this novel drags. Some interesting ideas are brought up, but not fleshed out. By the time we reach the climax, one of the characters expresses exactly what I thought: it's anticlimatic. Note to authors: when you write a character saying that the end of the story is anticlimatic, write a better climax.
If you have read the previous two books in this trilogy, you will read this, and you won't hate it, but you will be left with the feeling that it could have been much better.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
The Unfinished Symphonyt, June 24, 2007
Tony Ballantyne is a musician and I can't help but think of his novels as literary symphonies complete with movements, fugues, themes and flowing connecting lines. I admit right off the bat that I gave the preceding duo five stars due to the literary, structural and plotline originality. I especially liked CAPACITY, to me, the most successful of the trio. To say I had high hopes for this one would be an understatement - I couldn't wait to get home and get started. As usual, an engimatic beginning leads to a story that draws the reader inside.
We arrive in a Free Exchange (FE) universe. An entity (human, robot, AI, etc) approaches another and asks for a trade and FE software arranges a "fair exchange" though the reasons are murky and many times not known until later. This implies an almost supernatural prescience. The ship, with an interesting crew, takes on Judy (the atomic Judy of CAPACITY fame) who knows that for some reason she is being led to Earth which has become a dangerous place due to the existence of Dark Seeds. These dangerous entities grow in the presence of intelligence, thus, they are attracted to the Watcher who is ruling over a 1984sh Earth, peaceful, non-violent and brainwashed.
The story begins to go awry when Eva is introduced (the ship is the Eva Rye, yet another sign). Judy keeps imagining she is Eva and somehow - please don't ask - the reader is hurriedly given an explanation of the Watcher and his origins, FE and its origins, Judy and her origins, the VNMs and just about everything's origin except the Universe. It seems quite forced and as such, reeks of phoniness. The action gets wilder and wilder and more illogical until...WHOOOSH - the Watcher suddenly leaves and Earth returns to its "old ways" of mud and grass.
Yes, it's another case of uneven scientific development, the bane of so many sci-fi stories. Why, with AI, nanotech, VNM, etc should the Earth resort to primitive status? More to the point, why do people still die at age 80 two hundred years from now? What will happen to the other realities, the personality constructs? So many unanswered questions but the Watcher (praise his name) is nowhere to be found. I guess we can mark the whole thing down to a dream of someone in a virtual world. Tony, I'd appreciate another book that made sense.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Divergence converges, October 7, 2008
Note: This review will not make much sense to you unless you've read the previous two books in this trilogy, but you're welcome to read on all the same. I have tried my best to avoid including spoilers.
----
In this conclusion to the trilogy that began with "Recursion" and continued with "Capacity," author Tony Ballantyne brings together the various threads that have woven through the previous two books.
While, as in the previous novels, there's a multiple POV format, this time only one story is told. An ill-assorted group of interstellar traders picks up former Social Care agent Judy, who was featured in "Capacity," as part of a deal that involves the use of something called "FE," for Fair Exchange software.
Judy's now a basket case, and when she learns that she's actually the property of the DIANA corporation, which we learned about in "Capacity," she essentially decides there's nothing that she can do to fight the AI-controlled universe she's in, and lets the traders fulfill her destiny by taking her back to Earth, where the Dark Plants encountered in "Capacity" are now terrorizing what's left of the population, while "The Watcher" and the rogue-bot Glen fight for control.
The book is thoughtful and exciting, though it's not as fast-paced as the first two novels (but as part of the fair exchange it gives you more to think about), and maybe when Eva Rye turns up again, you'll wish she hadn't. The scenes with her, now living in the mostly Watcher-free Russian Free State, go on a bit too long; and the author force-feeds us PC material about disabled people that the novel could have done without.
But that's a minor complaint. The book is compelling.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
