Customer Reviews

Divided Families: What Happens to Children When Parents Part (Family and Public Policy)

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

Academics have a reputation for writing wonk-style texts that seem to value incomprehensibility over communication. Not so with this book, which reads with the smooth flow one might expect in a well-written feature story. One of the most interesting points of the book is a repudiation of the current popular idea that divorce itself is destroying children, pointing out that divorce is not an isolated event. Instead, the book examines the process of divorce: even if the parents don't make a legal split, much of the damage to kids is in the high conflict between parents. If the parents do divorce, it's what occurs before and after that affects families more that the moment of the marriage's legal dissolution. The book also addresses class issues, presenting a divorce case typical of many families in America--a family concerned with getting by on a blue/pink collar income, not with reading sociology books. The authors also address the role fathers play in intact families and trace the extension of that role to the divorced dad, profiling a composite man who relates to his children through his wife when they remain married and who has trouble building a separate father-identity once the mother is no longer his intermediary. The book points out that this role is changing--albeit slowly--especially in segments of the middle class, but divorce policy issues must address what is typical rather than what is ideal, and for now the burdens of divorce fall disproportionately on mothers. The final chapter on policy gives much fodder for more study. Overall, this is a thought-provoking and readable exploration of what will certainly remain a major, if unfortunate, component of American family life.

The authors of this book go out of their way to portray fathers in the worst possible light. There attitude is that the diminished relationship between fathers and their children following divorce is entirely the fault of the father, and furthermore that this is no big deal. From their point of view, the man should just pay and go away. They are dismissive of the idea of joint custody, down right hostile to the idea of fathers getting custody, and seem to think that fathers are basically irrelevent to children, aside from their economic impact, even in intact families. Apparently all the information they gather on divorced dads comes from their ex spouses, at least that seems to be the only parents they ever quote. Their only substantitive policy recomendation is to raise the level of child support payments and ever stricter enforcement of them. They argue that the standard of living of the man goes up after divorce, which seems to indicate that they have never met a divorce man. They do not even mention that child support payments are tax free to the mother and non tax deductable to the father, a rather glaring and down right deceptive ommision in doing any assesment of the economic impact of child support. All in all this book is so biased against men as to almost reach the level of hate speech.