The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship) [Hardcover]

John M. Frame (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: August 1, 1987

"Theology is the application of God's word to our lives in all situations." Taking this viewpoint he adds practical insight and counsel for how we should live.

--This text refers to the Kindle Edition edition.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 437 pages
• Publisher: P & R Publishing (August 1, 1987)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0875522629
• ISBN-13: 978-0875522623
• Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.4 x 1.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (21 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #43,923 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Semper Reformanda, April 18, 2000

By 

"xrizxomiz" (Oviedo, FL) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship) (Hardcover)

This book changed my entire theological and epistemic outlook. Frame should receive a prize for his clear and cogent writting style. His arguments are clear and persuasive as well. His multi-perspectival approach is theologically creative in the spirit of "Always Reforming" where so many theologians today are either stagnant and boreing, or "progressive" and so too esoteric. This is a significant work that will one day recieve classical status. In my opinion, the only drawback was that it did not dive deeper into a multi-perspectival epistemology. I would like to see the author explain a bit more some of the implications of certain elements of this view (i.e., What do the "same-sense"/"different-sense" distinctions imply for the laws of logic as classically defined? What role does "degree" and "emphasis" play in theological/philosophical (dis)agreements? How does a multi-perspectival epistemology relate to a tagmemic approach to linguistics?) However, I don't fault the author for not touching on these issues since this would obviously require much more ink and paper. Overall, I could not recommend this book enough.

25 of 30 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Must read for us orthodox Protestants!, August 4, 2001

By 

Berek Qinah Smith (Tokyo, Japan) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship) (Hardcover)

Any reformed, orthodox Protestant should find this a great read. It is fairly easy reading, though at the same time thought-provoking. The perspectivalism that Frame posits allows one a more three dimmentional thought process, I think. Frame goes through the doctrine of how we, as mere humans, know God. Though philosophy tends to bounce back and forth between anti-abstractionism and abstractionism (the One and the Many), Frame presents us with a refreshing Trinitarian answer to epistemology. I think this would be greatly beneficial to all people, Christian or not.

18 of 21 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A Book All Evangelicals Should Read, November 28, 2001

By 

James (Gainesville, FL United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship) (Hardcover)

My only regret about this book is that, most likely and most unfortunately, only those within the Reformed community will ever read it (or even hear about it)! I believe that Van Til's rich and profound thought suffered a similar fate. This is regrettable because Frame's work is so relevant for evangelicals today, esp. w/regard to epistemology and the task of theology in general, and it is so potentially fruitful!
Nevertheless, I hope it will be able to break out of the bounds of the relatively closed, if not somewhat incestuous dialogue w/in 'reformed circles', and flow into the broader evangelical community. With regard to those voices within the reformed dialogue who have rejected Frame's work as imprecise (demonstrating to me a failure to comprehend Frame, which is difficult to do, as he is very clear -- indeed, such out-of-hand rejection strikes me as a failure to even desire to comprehend), it is, in my opinion, precisely this sort of stale element that retards the continuing (and necessary) reformation of the church, and, of course, the reformed tradition itself. Frame's work in "The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God" should be given serious attention by all who would seek to be more faithful as theologians subject to the Lordship of Jesus Christ, whether professional, student or 'lay'.