Most Helpful Customer Reviews
17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Insightful look at the worst period of Virginia's history!, May 28, 2007
This review is from: Dominion of Memories: Jefferson, Madison, and the Decline of Virginia (Hardcover)
This analysis of Virginia History from 1800 to the Civil War and beyond is well researched, well-written, and fascinating. Dunn lets major figures such as Jefferson and Madison speak for themselves in chronicling the turning inward and clinging to slavery and class by a Virginia elite who oversaw a failure to adapt over a sixty year period. She does this without wasting words (it's a short book if you subtract the notes) and with a great deal of nuance and objectivity. There are historians with bigger names who write about wars and disasters- but Dunn does a brilliant job of telling this sad story of hard choices deferred and wasted. Good stuff!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Brilliant, October 27, 2009
How does the leading state of the Revolution (the Mother of Presidents) become a sad backwater 50 years later? Though the author points to many factors, what it all comes down to is slavery. Dunn, in fact, does a wonderful job tying all the various threads together.
Some of those threads include a culture that celebrated soil and leisure (did you know the original motto of Virginia was "God bestowed upon us this leisure"?), contempt for education and the intellect (serving mainly to justify slavery as "consistent with the purest justice"), and an active disregard for improvements and capitalism (land and slaves was all you needed). What Dunn does is show how all of these supported slavery and the aristocratic planter class that slavery itself supported.
Some of this has already been treated elsewhere, but Dunn does a particularly good job making the explicit connections to the Old Dominion (where I grew up). She does this primarily by focusing on Madison and Jefferson and the role they played. Neither comes across very well, but the Sage of Monticello comes out particularly poorly - at his backward, stubborn, retrograde, and hypocritical worst.
I also liked the attention she paid the two state constitutional conventions (where these issues were actually discussed at length), how the original state constitution (which Jefferson and Madison helped craft) effectively gave the planters all the power, and how tariffs and abolition were used as red herrings to draw attention away from the issue of slavery. Jumping forward a 100 years, she also shows how things really hadn't changed that much in the 20th Century, with a particular emphasis on Virginia's embarrassing role in the Civil Rights movement.
Dunn's writing style is also excellent. There is a ton of research behind this book, which is reflected especially in her quotes. I don't think I've ever read a book that had more telling quotes or used quotes better than this one.
Perhaps the only thing I didn't like was the attention paid to constitutional and legal matters. They're important, I'm sure many readers will enjoy them, but for me they were very boring. Overall, though, an incredible book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Mystery of Virginia, October 2, 2007
This review is from: Dominion of Memories: Jefferson, Madison, and the Decline of Virginia (Hardcover)
This solid volume sets out to answer a question that has puzzled many of us who have lived in Virginia: what caused the Commonwealth to decline in influence from the commanding position it held during the colonial and early national periods? Susan Dunn offers a variety of explanations for this phenomenon as she focuses primarily upon the period prior to the Civil War. Among the most important factors, in her judgment, was the "cult of the soil" mentality--that is, the Virginia prior to the Civil War was the epitome of culture, gracious living, political independence, and harmony (even including relations with slaves). The Tidewater control of Virginia, which began in colonial days, and included both economic and political dimensions, was highly resistant to giving way to more modern influences, such as broader sufferage, development of manufacturing, and expanded public education.
Individual chapters are used to spell out in detail Dunn's arguments on topics such as the impact of slavery; resistance to developing top-quality public education; the failure to develop road, canal and railroad networks; a reluctance to venture too far away from an agriculturally-based economy; a fixation on states' rights ideology; limiting the sufferage to a fraction of the white male population; and reliance upon tariffs for economic protection. Running through the entire pre-Civil War period of course is the institution of slavery and the continuing dread that the northern-industrial-free labor federal government might well decide to terminate slavery once and for all. Hence, abolitionists become primary enemies, and fighting them drained off important resources that could have been utilized to modernize Virginia. Jefferson, Madison and other Virginia national pollitical figures come in for some effective criticism by Dunn. Her analysis has an epilogue which focuses on the period from the New Deal to the present in Virginia, where such topics as the "massive resistance" movement and the leadership in opposition to Civil Rights Acts is dominated by Virginia Senators.
Well, what is one to say about this indictment, if that is what it is? Has Dunn overstated or oversimplified the issues? She certainly has done an impressive amount of research--the book contains 63 pages of very pertinent notes and references which serve as support blocks for her argument. Has she ignored other pertinent considerations? These are extremely difficult questions, and I think each reader has to judge the strength of her contentions based upon their own background, historical knowledge, and temperament. I certainly found it a worthy book to read, and it stimulated some new synapses for me. But then again, I am only a former Virginian.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|