36 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
I wish the book had talked a little more substance., September 8, 2009
This review is from: Don't Be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style (Paperback)
I suppose this disclaimer will have all the impact of one of those "Some of my best friends are..." statements, but I want it known that I really like Randy Olson. I think "Flock of Dodos" is a great documentary, and it would be hard indeed not to like Olson personally. He really does have a flair for film communication, and in that fairly narrow realm has something worth saying and consequently worth listening to.
But this book is too autobiographical--to the point where some sections should have started "Dear Diary"--to be of much practical use to scientists looking for clues how to communicate better. For those handful of scientists actually interested in filmmaking, sure, this is absolutely a must-have book. But for the lab denizen looking for ways to maybe spice up that presentation a little, there are tips and key principles presented in "Such," but perhaps not enought to provide enough help. I would recommend a more general book on how to create a memorable presentation if that's what's being sought.
As a critique of science's pitiful position vis a vis inspiring, motivating, and educating the public, "Such" probably has more value.
And let me add that apart from what I took to be an overabundance of sentences that began with "And," "But," and "Well," the writing of the book, the actual prose, is a paradigm of what Olson is trying to promote: A style wed to substance that helps pull an audience along with humor and stories and a refreshing nontechnical approach. Much as I liked that sort of element in the book, I closed it thinking there is still a need for another book, perhaps from a medium other than film, to provide additional perspective. One of the best living science communicators (probably because he is not a scientist who learned how to communicate but a communicator exceedingly adept with science) is Carl Zimmer. I would love to see a book by Zimmer on how he manages to make so much science compelling and understandable to his audiences, which include, for example, the New York Times.
I also wonder if Olson didn't perhaps write this book a bit too early. The need is now, I get that, and perhaps it was the urgency of the times, in which science illiteracy really does threaten humanity's future, that prompted Olson to rush this work a little. But with only two feature movies under his belt, and really only one that is widely known, could it be too early for him to be writing a book of this sort? Olson seems to circle back to a limited number of circumstances (I understand that his experience with an acting teaching was transformative, but grew a little weary of references to even this pivotal event) a few too many times. An ability to draw a greater breadth of experiences might have served the work well.
On the other hand, Olson DOES make excellent use of historical anecdotes and fascinating examples suggested by research to flesh out the prose, and the single greatest selling point of everything Olson puts his hand to, seemingly, is passion. A little passion can help us get over the hill if other things are lacking, and Olson brings so much passion to this book that we fairly fly, like a chase scene set in San Francisco. I just wish, with all that, the car had been packed a little more carefully for the trip.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
28 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A must-read: communicating to the general public is important!, September 10, 2009
This review is from: Don't Be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style (Paperback)
There are people in science who know what they're talking about. And there are people in the realm of science who make a greater impact on the general population. Often, these are not the same people, and Randy Olson takes us on his quest to figure out "why?". Why won't people listen to scientists who know what they're talking about? They've spent their whole lives focusing on their field of expertise. Why do their real-life adventures and thrilling discoveries go unnoticed by the general public? It is a common obstacle that I share with my peers in scientific fields who have a drive to use their knowledge to make a difference in the world. Can you imagine how discouraging it is when our thoughts and stories about our life's work are met with yawns and glazed eyes?
This book picks the issue apart scientifically, but (thankfully) is not written scientifically. I find scientific writing to be dense and, well, a little difficult to read (making me sleepy and blurring my vision a little). Olson practices what he preaches and presents his rather strong argument through compelling anecdotes and current examples that are common knowledge. His conversational writing style is a pleasure to read, and this is a must-read for all seasoned and aspiring scientists.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
too little about science communication, too much about the author, December 28, 2009
This review is from: Don't Be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style (Paperback)
I am a professor at a research university and I care deeply about communicating science to the public. I am grateful to the author for writing a book on this important topic. The book does contain a few useful insights on what not to do. However, I feel that the useful part of the message could be condensed into a three- to five-page memo. A lot of the material deals with why the author thinks he is funny or innovative or right, why he thinks his work is under-appreciated, or why he thinks his personal history is relevant. All of the navel-gazing really distracts from the message. This is unfortunate, considering that this is a book on communication. I would recommend reading the three- to five-page memo to my fellow scientists, but I would hesitate recommending reading the book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No