| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The premises behind Why Men Don't Listen and Women Can't Read Maps is that all too often, these differences get in the way of fulfilling relationships and that understanding our basic urges can lead to greater self-awareness and improved relations between the sexes. The Peases spent three years researching their book--traveling the globe, talking to experts, and studying the cutting-edge research of ethnologists, psychologists, biologists, and neuroscientists--yet their work does not read a bit like "hard science." In fact, the authors go to considerable lengths to point out that their book is intended to be funny, interesting, and easy to read; in short, this is a book whose primary purpose is to talk about "average men and women, that is, how most men and women behave most of the time, in most situations, and for most of the past."
Why Men Don't Listen, therefore, deals largely in generalizations, and this is bound to alienate some readers. "We don't beat around the bush with suppositions or politically correct clichés," the Peases claim. Those up for an irreverent and unapologetic take on why men and women just can't help themselves sometimes may just decide to read on. --Svenja Soldovieri
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
27 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
An very interesting book.,
By
This review is from: Why Men Don't Listen and Women Can't Read Maps: How We're Different and What to Do About It (Paperback)
I've just read through all the reviews and I've noticed one thing. The people who don't like the book clearly haven't read it properly or got what the author is saying.There was only one bad review I agreed with at all, and that was the gentleman who pointed out that, even though the book is written by a couple, the emphasis does seem a little more female oriented at times. However, the majority of the bad reviews are entitled "I'm a woman and I can read maps" or such like. Please don't let this put you off buying the book. The authors state quite clearly in the opening chapters of the book that the information represents an overall picture and that the science is based on what is the case MOST of the time, not ALL of the time. They do tell you quite regularly that there are exceptions. There is also a test early on in the book to show the probable levels of male hormone you received in the womb. I have done this test with a fair number of people now and it is amazingly accurate. I'm guessing that many of the negative reviews come from people who didn't bother to do this test, which would then make much of the book seem like nonsense. As I have already said, and think needs saying again, this book is what is generally the case, not what is always the case. Taken in that light, and also taking into account that the authors also say at the start of the book that many will dismiss it on a number of reasons which they list (and every negative reviewer bar the one I agreed with comes somewhere on the list), it really doesn't pay to listen to the negative comments. This book is not trying to enforce negative stereotypes. Far from it. This book suggests many ways in which certain character traits can be much better understood. For certain chapters where it explains things such as why men tend to sleep around more, it also clearly states that the authors do not believe this makes the behaviour more acceptable, and they actually state that "luckily" there are ways of changing in built natural behavior. I have just read one part of the book that actually says this out right, that the biological instict is not always the best thing to follow in a modern society. Basically, the negative reviews are from people who had made up their mind before they had even read the book, or who did not want to believe what they saw. My last point is to the reviewer who claimed that phrases such as "research now shows" mean nothing. There are plenty of facts that do state where the research comes from, and had every single fact been backed up by when, where and who did the reasearch, the book would probably be very hard to read (there would be references on every other line practically), and probably about twice the size! Buy this book, read the first chapters carefully so you fully understand where the authors are coming from and what they are trying to achieve, and then enjoy the rest.
43 of 50 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A sort of Australian Mars/Venus book.,
This review is from: Why Men Don't Listen & Women Can't Read Maps (Hardcover)
The authors start from two straightforward premises:Men and women are very different in the way that they act, react, think and feel. These differences are the inevitable consequence of our biology. The first of these is a lot less controversial than the second and, perhaps the book would have ruffled fewer feathers if the authors had stuck to the first premise. However, the caveman-cavewoman analogies do help them to illustrate their points. The book is well put together in a pretty light-hearted style. While not being unputdownable, it is an easy read. One quibble though has to be that, after a while, many of the jokes seem to be a little tedious. As well as illustrating the differences between men and women, the book gives examples of how these lead to conflict and misunderstandings. Their advice is pretty much to learn about the differences and grin and bear it. Of course, the book goes over much the same ground as the Mars-Venus stuff but, it does so at a somewhat simpler and, some would say, superficial level. If you get to the end of Mars-Venus and absorb what it says then this book is not for you. On the other hand, If you found M-V to be too heavy and a bit pretentious then the lighthearted and more direct style of this book could be just what you need. At the end of the book, there is a substantial list of references and further reading. This varies from other popular psychology books to research papers which provide the scientific backing for the authors ideas. Unfortunately, they just list these with no comment and no attempt to categorise the items. This means that the list is of little use to a reader interested in exploring further topics or referring to some of the research on which the authors ideas depend.
52 of 64 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Male-bashing, unreferenced tosh,
This review is from: Why Men Don't Listen and Women Can't Read Maps: How We're Different and What to Do About It (Paperback)
I had high hopes for this book. I was excited at finding a genuine, factual book, explaining the psychological and biological differences between the male and female brain. I was looking forward to understanding more about the human sexes at an unbiased level. And then I started reading it. And I wasn't excited any more. For something portrayed as unbiased and fact-based, it's a purley just another male-bashing book. There are three main issues I have with it: Firstly, most sources for their information are completely unreferenced and look like they're just there to prove their point. Common phrases are "scientist have discovered", "research has found" and "experts now know" - all useless phrases, lacking substance to anyone with more than one brain cell. Secondly, it constantly repeats itself over and over. Usually in the form of annoyingly large key phrases dotted around every paragraph or so. They would be a great way to sum up what's just been said, particularly if it was a hard concept to grasp, but they don't. They more or less repeat the last sentence word for word. A good example can be found on page 7: "Whether men and women are _equal_ is a political or moral question, but weather they are _identical_ is a scientific one. [Then in large italicised writing underneath:] The equality of men and women is a political or moral issue; the essential difference is a scientific one." ... and you feel like yelling at the book, "I KNOW, YOU JUST TOLD ME, STOP INSULTING MY READING ABILITIES". Thirdly, and most importantly, it's heavily biased towards women. If it were marketed as such, I wouldn't have a problem, but it's not. And let me point out at this stage that I have no problems at all with poking fun at male stereotypes. But every single page begins to wear you down. Especially when there's not fun being poked at women.It's advertised as a biological insight into our brains and why men can and cannot do some things and why women can and cannot do other things. Seems simple, and if they'd have stuck to the plan, it would have worked. Instead, anything where women excel (multi-tasking etc.) is rammed down our throats time after time after time. Everything where women falter (knowing left from right) is also blamed upon the male for not understanding the woman's brain. Anything the men excel (direction) at is sparse, but played down when it's there and anything men don't do well at is the cause of much "jocularity" and usually subject to a derogatory cartoon. Here's a selection of some subject headings, cartoons and (annoyinglylarge and unnecessary italicised quotes): Page xv: A cartoon entitled "A Sunday Drive" where the dad is at the wheel of a car. His wife is next to him, looking scared and the kids are leaning out the back window with a sign saying, "HELP! WE ARE LOST BUT OUR DAD WON'T STOP TO ASK FOR DIRECTIONS" The text starts with a story about a family out for a drive where the dad gets angry because people are talking and he can't concentrate on driving. Page 4: [The first quote] How many men does it take to change a roll of toilet paper? It's unknown, it's never happened. Page 17: Chapter two starts with a cartoon of a man complaining he can't find the butter in the fridge. Page 22: [Quote] Women have wider peripheral vision, men have tunnel vision. Page 23: [Subject] Why Women's Eyes See So Much Page 25: [Subject] Men and Ogling Page 27: [Subject] Why Women Have A Sixth Sense Page 29: [Subject] Why Men Can't Lie To Women Page 30: [Subject] Women Read Between the Lines Page 31: [Subject] Why Boys Don't Listen Page 32: [Subject] Men Miss The Details Page 36: [Subject] Why Men Are So Thick-Skinned Page 41: Chapter three starts with the age-old cartoon of a cross-section fo a female's and a male's brain. The male's is full of Sex, exaggeration and "lame excuses" as well as tiny "Asking for directions microns" and one single "Hearing children in the middle of the night neurone". Predictable, page 43 has the womens brain full of "committment" and "lie detector" Page 47; [Quote] Tests show [uncredited] that women rate three percent higher in general intelligence than men. Page 52: [Quote] Ask men and women if their brains work differently. Men will say they think they do, in fact there was something they were reading on the Internet the other day... Women will say, of course they do - next question? ... and it carries on in that vein throughout. The annoying thing is, it's all true and we all know that, but why is there such a heavy emphasis on the women's point of view? Credit where it's due, I'm only one-third of the way through the book. If it gets better, I'll let you know. Sadly, I have a feeling this will be my last post...
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|