I was recently given `Don't Go There' as a birthday gift. I am very thankful - at least I didn't spend any money on this book. I'll state off the bat to assuage Mr. Greenberg's fan club that I HAVE read the book, I'm not in the tourism industry in ANY form (other than as a traveler) and I have NO interest/residence in any of the places I mention.
Previously I had a passing familiarity with Mr. Greenberg's name. I don't know why he is considered an `expert' and I still don't know. There will always be differences of opinion and that is what makes the world go round. However -
To suggest to people that they shouldn't go to places with high rates of suicide (he cites in the U.S. Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Wyoming, Alaska and Manhattan - we've had wonderful vacations in some of those places) because suicide might be contagious.....
Skipping cities (or towns) where the residents eat a lot of fast food - oh yeah, that is a reason not to go to San Antonio, Texas.
Deriding "Fake European Towns" such as Solvang, California (founded in 1911 by a group of Danish educators) and Castroville, Texas (established in 1844 by several dozen European families from Alsace and Baden). I'll give him Leavenworth, Washington, but it is absolutely shocking that immigrants would fashion a town after their homeland - not. Where is his outrage at Vail, Colorado or the epitome of fake, Las Vegas, Nevada?
Yes, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but these are just a few of the examples of why I don't value Mr. Greengerg's opinion.
Mr. Greenberg states in his introduction that his book is "about presenting - not promoting - facts that allow people to make reasonably intelligent, independent decisions about the choices available to them". He also includes "... there will be claims that I inserted facts out of context...". Well, I DO have a problem with his representations of facts. In the discussion of lost luggage and airlines (without a doubt a definite concern) the 10 worst offenders for a specific quarter are listed. About the airline with the fewest lost luggage (of those worst) the book states: "...which mishandled 9.92 bags per 1,000 people. Hey, at least it's under 10 percent!" Yes, that number is under 10 percent. It is also under 50 percent. Perhaps stating that they were under 1 percent would have been more accurate and informative. Even the worst of the worst mishandled 13.16 bags for every 1,000 passengers. That is even under 10 percent, at 1.316 percent. Ten percent does sound more dramatic though. I will say that the next time I'm at a luggage carousel, watching the bags go round and round, I'll be thinking that at least 1 of each 100 of them probably shouldn't be there. If Mr. Greenberg and his "team of dedicated staffers" have problems with such basic math, all his other "facts" come into question.
Do I consider Mr. Greenberg's `Don't Go There' a travel resource? NO. Is it entertaining? Yes, but not entertaining enough to buy. I'd suggest looking for it at your local library. I know I'm now not at all interested in any of his so-called `expertise'.