Most Helpful Customer Reviews
125 of 131 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Authors that later lie about their message., November 6, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Dow 36,000: The New Strategy for Profiting from the Coming Rise in the Stock Market (Paperback)
This book was one of the reasons I got completely out of the stock market in late '99 early 2000. When I read this pustulous piece of putrescent puffery I just knew I had to get out. THANK YOU KEVIN AND JAMES!!!!! I come to write this review because just for a lark I thought I'd search the internet for Glassman, see what he's pushing today, so I can get out of it for my own safety. In writing this review I treat the authors' late-90s media appearances and book-related articles all as one whole. Hassett and Glassman are out there now (Nov 2002) writing (paraphrased) "we never wrote the DOW would be at 36000 soon". I read the book in fact in winter 99/00 along with some of their articles, and did catch a few of their TV appearances. They definitely did write either in the book or one of the accompanying pieces (Washington Post or The Atlantic) that stocks are in a 'one-time surge' and everyone must GET IN NOW. Their media appearances were even worse... "GET IN NOW!!! DON'T MISS THIS ONCE IN A LIFETIME OPPORTUNITY!!!! YOU'RE FOOLS IF YOU DON'T MORTGAGE YOUR HOUSE TO BUY STOCK!!" They used to remind me of that Joe Piscopo SNL salesman character (you remember, the frenzied salesman, "WE MUST BE INSANE!!! OUR PRICES ARE SO LOW WE'LL GO OUT OF BUSINESS YESTERDAY!!!!"). And they are completely unrepentant. I just read a Glassman article (Wash Post - why the ...are they still giving this unrepentant, lying moron/clown a stage?) claiming he was right all along and 36000 is STILL the DOW's fair value. Claiming that Siegel's research supported G&H's conclusions (Siegel, who currently seems bullish said they misconstrued his research. Interesting word, misconstued - is Siegel saying G&H are liars, idiots, or some combination thereof?). Claiming that all investors everywhere should still be fully invested in the stock market for the long term. Something a lot of the other reviews are not pointing out is that G&H had ideological motives for pushing stocks (Glassman was once publisher of a right wing magazine, I forget which one). Both G&H were[1] republicans and both felt that the more people own stock the more conservative they become, in an attempt to protect their assets. [1] I don't know their current predilictions.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
81 of 84 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Three stars for humor, July 28, 2002
This review is from: Dow 36,000: The New Strategy for Profiting from the Coming Rise in the Stock Market (Paperback)
Dow 36,000 elicits (or did from me) plenty of laughs. It would have taken a couple of academics to produce such a relentlessly wrongheaded book. The key errors are twofold, in my opinion. First, the authors exhibit precisely that of which they accuse those who differed with them: they think they are smarter than the market. They feel (or felt -- maybe they have wised up by now) that right at that moment (mid-1999) the Dow should have been three hundred percent higher than it was at the time and that the proper PE ratio was 100. Nevermind that market history refuted that position, and nevermind that we have seen such claims before and they proved false. (The authors strain credulity in their attempts to show otherwise.) Second, the authors assumed that earnings growth (which they apparently took to be real) would continue ad infinitum at a steady upward incline AND that dividend growth would take a similar path. Well, the intervening years have proven both assumptions to be completely false. They made a pro forma nod toward ups and downs in the market, but ignored the meaning and impact of those ups and downs. More fundamentally, perhaps, the authors' relentless (albeit I think somewhat disingenuous) insistence on the long run (20 years plus) ignores the reality that (1) many big players in the market are NOT waiting out 20 years, but rather play for short term advantage and (2) many people -- those who actually have to live off their investments -- must sell from time to time to cover expenses, and CANNOT simply wait out gut-wrenching market drops. The most ludicrous advice in the book is, in effect, that investors SHOULD fall in love with their stocks -- which is the most fundamental error of all, and one that has victimized countless investors. Their term is to form a personal relationship with their stocks, but the meaning is the same: fall in love with them and hold on for dear life no matter what signals the market is sending. That worked out *real* well for bagholders of Worldcom, Enron, Sun Microsystems, and at this point, it appears, even Automatic Data Processing, one of their favorites. This is not to say that patience is a bad thing, but only that blind devotion to a stock even through badly damaged fundamentals and the intrusion of important new information is insane. Now, in mid-2002, much of this book elicits guffaws -- but the strength of the laughter is inversely proportional, I suspect, to how badly burned one was by following the authors' loopy advice.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
79 of 85 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Absurd, April 27, 2005
James Glassman should apologize for his stupidity, his arrogance, and this book, which lured in a whole lot of amateur investors just as the stock market was about to go bust.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|