4.0 out of 5 stars
The reality of it all, December 28, 2007
This review is from: Drawn to Extremes: The Use and Abuse of Editorial Cartoons in the United States (Hardcover)
Professor Lamb's overview of political cartoons and how they have gone from very important to marginal reflects a changing society,and a markedly declining newspaper readership.Lamb's volume is replete with political cartoons,both old and new,which is fine for a mere coffee table show book,but his comments intend to portray the way in which this decline in good political cartooning reflects the way in which the modern reader has abandoned traditional political satire in the same way that he/she has largely abandoned the newspaper as a primary source for news.While well-written,the book bemoans reality,and because of this cannot actually reflect the reasons why both the newspaper and the political cartoon are going the way of the Dodo bird,that is to say towards extinction.In an age of instant news instantly available,on the teevee,on the radio,on the internet,both the power and the relevance of a political cartoon has lost a good deal of its ability to influence us,but Lamb,who apparently has not accepted this new reality,refuses to see this as fact,which,in my opinion,is the main failing of his book.
Also lost in Lamb's considerations is the fact that here,in America,fewer and fewer people even bother to read a newspaper,let alone seek out a political cartoon that may be posted on an internet site..The news itself,usually bad,usually beyond the scope of any one individual to influence with his or her vote,has become something that no longer excites the average person..A terrorist act,like9/11,may glue a person to the teevee set,and it may temporarily increase the sales of daily newspapers,but overall,the average person is seemingly content to be fed snippets of news,sans political satire,in-between commercial at six or at eleven on the idiot box..
The golden age of the political cartoon was during the 19th century,lasting from around the time of the civil war,in the 1860s until shortly before WW1,in 1913-1919...Giants such as Joseph Keppler,Bernard Gillam and Thomas Nast weilded as much influence with thier political drawings as editors such as Whitelaw Reid or Horace Greeley did with thier words alone..And,it must be stated,newspapers abounded then,as much because the population supported them as because there were then few other mass outlets through which the average jane and joe might become informed.
Nast,whose best work was published in Harper's Weekly,brought down the so-called"Tweed Ring",a politally powerful but utterly corrupt new york city democractic machine..He did this almost single-handedly,his cartoons accounting for much in an age in which many could not read,but anyone could see and understand a drawn picture."Boss Tweed" himself is said to have complained that his followers could not read but"can't help seeing them damned pictures"..What cartoonist drawing editorial pieces today can claim to have such influence?
This book is a good reference,and has many pictures of political cartoons,but it does not seem to understand or accept the new reality of things
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
One Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words., January 13, 2006
This review is from: Drawn to Extremes: The Use and Abuse of Editorial Cartoons in the United States (Hardcover)
As newspaper readership stagnates, publishers are reducing staff. As a result of the deteriorating newspaper industry, cartoonists are losing jobs and few are finding new ones. At the 2003 Pittsburgh convention of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists, Rob Rogres, the conference's organizer, observed "that the shrinking number of cartoonists reflects the economics and priorities of the newspaper industry. He's one of the lucky ones, as staff cartoonist for Pittsburgh's 'Post-Gazette.'
This book is full of editorial cartoons plus a few comic strips, some old but still relevant, some of more recent vintage. "If things continue as they have [been]," one frustrated cartoonist said, "they may be forced to do as they did in colonial days: sell their work on the streets." Kevin Kallangher, a former president of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists, "predicted that editorial cartooning would rise and fall with daily newspapers. The future of cartooning is inextricably bound to the future of newspapers."
At the Pittsburgh gathering in 2003, the fact that "the number of editorial cartoonists working full time for daily newspapers had dropped to a 30-yr. low. These annual conventions have become more and more like reunions of WWII veterans," fewer return and those who do "wonder which of them will be the next one to go." The profession has compromised itself by using subs instead of the real thing. "Paul Conrad [of the 'Los Angeles times'] once told a gathering of cartoonists that they had shrunk from their responsibilities because they were ill informed on either the issues of the day or the classics of antiquity."
This is an important form of American journalism, using pictures to show social criticism in this country's tradition of a free press. "As artists, satirists, and commentators, editorial cartoonists make a unique and invaluable contribution to society. My local daily newspaer has an excellent, long-time staff cartoonist on the editorial page. "Journalism ought to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable; there's no better way to afflict the comfortable than with editorial cartoons." And Charlie Daniel at the 'Knoxville News Sentinel' is one of the best.
By having too many editorial columnists and writers, but no full time editorial cartoonist, journalism is reflected in "the decling readership and declinging influence of American newspapers." Chris Lamb is professor of communications at the College of Charleston.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No