The Dual Nature of Islamic Fundamentalism [Hardcover]

Johannes Jansen (Author)

Product Details

• Hardcover: 198 pages
• Publisher: Cornell Univ Pr (April 1997)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 080143338X
• ISBN-13: 978-0801433382
• Product Dimensions: 8.8 x 5.7 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 13.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,706,836 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

19 of 25 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars The Dual Nature of Islamic Fundamentalism, July 31, 2001

By 

Daniel Pipes, Middle East Forum, Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Dual Nature of Islamic Fundamentalism (Hardcover)

Jansen, a professor at Leiden University in Holland, is one of the most astute and daring writers on fundamentalist Islam. His title points to the rather pedestrian fact that fundamentalist Islam is both fully politics and fully religion, but the book offers the authors deep understanding of this phenomenon, which he characterizes as an unusual combination of logic, religion, politics and violence.

Jansen shows how fundamentalist Islam is religion narrowed down to an ideology but is still a religion, albeit one concerned with earthly power. He establishes that it is not a protest against being poor but an invariably successful form of propaganda because the public to whom it is addressed love to hear it. The two chapters on fundamentalist attitudes toward Jews and women are among the most incisive anywhere. But the most interesting chapter may be the failure of the liberal alternative, in which Jansen establishes that the anti-fundamentalists have no weapons other than words and so are steadily losing to the fundamentalists, who have large masses of followers.

Jansens book is not so much a systematic study as a series of musings by a original and daring mind, primarily concentrating on Egypt. He reads the writers others only cite, such as Faraj Fuda and Shukri Mustafa. He chides not just fundamentalists, but also the ulema and fellow orientalists for absurdities and errors in logic. Islam, he says, obviously must be tolerated in an open society, but does this tolerance extend to Islamic fundamentalism too? Yes, he replies, if it is a legitimate form of Islam; but not if it is a political ideology.

Middle East Quarterly, December 1997