1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Dubious manuscript, January 25, 2008
This review is from: Dubious Honors (Paperback)
I originally bought this volume (at a used book store for a buck) because I had yet to read any M.F.K. Fisher, a huge gap in my culinary literacy. I didn't notice at the time that the content was a series of Introductions, Prefaces, and Forewords to other books, mostly culinary titles. Some of these writings were published in the books of others and a few were generated for her own works.
I have been on close terms with a large number of various types of celebrities, (some small-time, some renowned worldwide), over the course of my lifetime and there is something about most of them, however "nice" they might be, that is purely superficial (one major exception I know of to this rule is the great Harry Carey, Jr., a VERY nice and genuine man). My point in saying this is that, having now read "Dubious Honors," I did not leave the work with a warm and fuzzy feeling about M.F.K. Fisher.
The reader will discover that most of the entries are "nostalgic" and more about M.F.K. Fisher than the book which she was introducing. She also always mentions money, ("paid" or "unpaid"), one way or another, (in her "Introductions" to her "Introductions"), and the perceptive reader can detect her genuine [unwritten] feeling about such remuneration, or the lack thereof, in each instance. I really felt that these comments did not contribute positively, or at all, to the book.
Fisher died in 1992 at the ripe old age of 83 -- this was one of her later publications (1988) and, in all honesty, appears to be a milking of previous work just for one more "tick," to quote an English birdwatching term. While she wants you to believe that she wrote these, mostly kind, words either for good friends who deserved her praise, or for truly great literary efforts, I still garnered a feeling of the mercenary which she must have unconsciously conveyed in her writing.
One could easily say that M.F.K. Fisher was a controversial figure so I was certainly expecting some level of outrageousness in her comments. I found about what I had expected in that realm but I also picked up enough "drift" to come away thinking that Ms. Fisher may have been a sort of a [...] on some level. I don't cite that term with any mendacious or degrading motives -- I just mean it to clearly convey, for example, that when she got invited to social functions, I'll wager that it was more likely to fulfill "a social void" rather than to have her around for her bubbly personality.
"Dubious Honors," aside from the title, is an ego work. I did find it easy to read and interesting as well, albeit, I didn't actually learn much of use to me from the text. Fans of M.F.K. Fisher should think of this work as heavily autobiographical and will probably discover that it is much to their liking. There is some culinary interest, especially as it applies to the publication of cookbooks -- I think one could glean out some good advice from the text in that singular, obscure realm. Most casual readers, however, should probably pass this one by.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No