Duofold

Duofold Men's Expedition Weight Two-Layer Thermal Tagless Bottom

• polyester
• base-layer-underwear closure
• Machine wash cold with like colors. use only non-chlorine bleach when needed. no fabric softener. tumble dry low. do not iron.

Product Description

From the Manufacturer

At Duofold we are dedicated to delivering outdoor performance base layer that gives you the freedom to feed your passions and focus on the jobs at hand. Combining a history of success stretching back 100 years, with the latest fabrics and garment technology.

Product Description

Two layer thermal bottom for extremely cold weather with draw cord and flatlock seams

Product Details

• Product Dimensions: 11.3 x 8.2 x 1.1 inches ; 6.4 ounces
• Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Shipping: This item is also available for shipping to select countries outside the U.S.
• ASIN: B0019RS0IC
• Item model number: 820H
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (23 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #889 in Clothing (See Top 100 in Clothing)
  • #9 in Clothing > Men > Active > Active Base Layers

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

24 of 24 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Duofold 820h Expedition weight 2-layer thermal bottoms, October 28, 2008

By 

JC in NC - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Duofold Men's Expedition Weight Two-Layer Thermal Tagless Bottom (Apparel)

Very warm baselayer long underwear. I wear size 36 pants so I ordered size large. A bit snug but I think that's the idea. I bought these primarily for coldweather motorcycle riding. When used in conjunction with good windblocking pants they are very effective. They keep me warm while wicking away moisture and sweat. They are not bulky at all which is very important and are priced less than half of comparable underarmour models. I've found they work well just wearing underneath any other clothes when it's cold out.

Highly recommended for any cold weather activity.

27 of 30 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Not like they used to be, February 14, 2009

By 

Dave in wi (WI) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Duofold Men's Expedition Weight Two-Layer Thermal Tagless Bottom (Apparel)

I bought a set of Duofold Expedition weight thermals over five years ago. They are really comfy and very warm. I only wore them on those really cold nights. Well, after this winter of more really cold nights than usual, I decided to get another pair. I was disappointed. This new pair is not as thick as the old pair and not as warm. Also, the old pair of thermal bottoms had a brief-type opening in the front so you could access your equipment when nature called. The new thinner version has no opening of any sort in the front.

These are decent thermals, but being thinner than the old ones and not as warm, I wouldn't order them again at the price they are selling for.

9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Extremely warm and low weight, but get one size up, January 16, 2010

By 

Manzanilla Olives "Manzanilla" (Florida) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Duofold Men's Expedition Weight Two-Layer Thermal Tagless Bottom (Apparel)

I find the Varitherm expedition weight material to be very warm, as well as soft and lightweight. These are designed to be used by people who need to move, so they are form fitting and moisture wicking. There is also a 'sportsman' expedition weight model available from Duofold which might be heavier but it is not designed foe moving. I usually wear 34 pants, and I can even just button 32 size pants, so I ordered the medium (32-34). This turned out to be a mistake, since the elastic band is very tight. The material around my legs fit perfectly, but I ended up cutting the elastic with scissors which was a big improvement. I also ordered the large as a second pair, and these fit my 34 waist without any discomfort, but the legs are just a tad looser than form fitting. I'm not sure why they use tight elastic at all, especially since they also include a string if you want to make it tighter.

2115|R2SYHB783ULCUB;2115|RLKN2WFQHZGIL;2115|RGAXLJD1GUX7U;