16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting and well-written, June 23, 2004
In this short, readable book (in part an update of Tournament of Shadows), Meyer first provides some background on imperial competition among the British, the Russians, and the Americans in Southwest and Central Asia. Subsequent chapters describe recent history in Iran, Afghanistan, the Caucasus, and the Central Asian republics that once were part of the Soviet Union. Meyer's writing is clear, lively, and well-informed; events are placed in context, and are illuminated with sharply observed detail. While the discussion of issues is relatively light, this is an eye-opening introduction for those not already knowledgeable about the region.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Well Written But Light, October 8, 2006
This review is from: The Dust of Empire: The Race for Mastery in The Asian Heartland (Paperback)
Meyer did history a service when he reopened the classic account of the struggle for central asia through the ages in his rather more famous "Tournament of Shadows." This, more slender, volume is written in less grandiose style, but still is a call for the greater world (and especially Americans) to understand the region as a whole in its historical, cultural and geopolitical context.
The style is more of a Cook's tour with chapters dedicated to each of the states in Central Asia.
I found however that Meyer offers enough to tease and entice on each country, but not quite enough to satify... just when the going got more in-depth and intriguing, it was time to move to another country. For those liking imperial 19th Century "Great Game" narratives, there is precious little in this volume. History is only a prop to put the country into its current context of understanding in the realm of power politics -- which it should be said, Meyer utlises both classical power politics and liberal theories in his explaination of how the world relates to central asia.
The one good thing I would add is this: instead of the current fashion of American historians and currrent events commentators concentrating on American interpretations -- American Oil, beltway politics, and the endless citing of each Presidential Administration's response to the politics of the region -- there is a general eagle-eye view that keeps the general interests and threats of all major actors in mind. He does this while reminding us of the human cost in terms of lives and lost rights, most often taken by states from their own people. As such morality looms large in his descriptions, though not necessarily proscriptions for the region.
For those who are interested in real analysis of world affairs and sick of the usual talking head suspects on the left or right, then this is a very intelligent, considered, and interesting overview.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Bit Unfocused but Fascinating Nonetheless, October 13, 2003
By A Customer
Meyer's thesis seems to be that US dominance of sovereign countries is a bad thing. Using historical examples of American, British, and Russian imperialism, he makes this point well. But he never really explains why the Central Asian republics are at special risk for this kind of imperialism. The book seems on one hand to be about the risks of imperialism in general, and on the other hand a summary of recent Central Asian history.
I would have preferred two separate books--one on the dangers of imperialism, and one on the history and future of Central Asia. (The book may have been a bit rushed and its thesis may have been redirected by recent events) But nonetheless, the chapters are on their own all very interesting, and Meyer has a lot of insight about the situation.
But despite the structural flaws, I recommend this book highly to anyone interested in foreign policy or in recent Middle Eastern/Central Asian history.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No