Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Color:
  • Dymo Labelpoint 350 Labelpoint 350 China, 1/Card (17897)
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
  • To view this video download Flash Player
      

Dymo Labelpoint 350 Labelpoint 350 China, 1/Card (17897)

by DYMO

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
  • Use as a stand-alone labeler or connect to PC.
  • SmartPaste feature prints labels copied from computer documents.
Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Product Description

A powerhouse for retailers and warehouse managers, this versatile label printer produces bar codes, symbols and many background effects. Whether you need to organize an office, shop floor or factory, use this to handle matters easily and quickly.

Product Details

  • Product Dimensions: 9.9 x 3.3 x 5.6 inches ; 2 pounds
  • Shipping Weight: 2.2 pounds
  • Domestic Shipping: Item can be shipped within U.S.
  • International Shipping: This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
  • ASIN: B000BOWRGU
  • Item model number: 17897
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Date first available at Amazon.com: July 7, 2004

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
0
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Jean Shepherd on June 27, 2009
The Dymo LP350 does some things the LP300 didn't - vertical and decorative type - but doesn't do some of the basic things nearly as well as the predecessor. The LP300 had a single font, a standard sans-serif typeface, but the user could tweak the sizes endlessly within the confines of the tape size. The LP350 has more fonts, but the sizes are far more limited. I prefer the former.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again