7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Only Average, at Best, April 28, 2002
This review is from: Dynasty: The Stuarts: 1560-1807 (Hardcover)
MacLeod's book is best in the areas of least interest, namely the early Scottish Stuarts. Unfortunately, it is at its weakest in discussing the family's 17th Century English kings, who provide far more interesting subjects. Nonetheless, MacLeoed approaches them in a rather cursory and one dimensional manner which leaves a motivated reader rather unsatisfied. His closest approach to approval of any of these is for Charles II, but even then he damns this most fascinating and underrated of monarchs (in view of the challenges he faced) with faint praise.
More troubling, MacLeod demonstrates an open and excessive anti-Catholic bias rarely exhibited over the last half century. In doing so, he devalues the more modern and tolerant approaches to religious policy desired by the later Stuart kings, but which were frustrated by parliament and revolution. At the same time, he is slavish in his devotion to such premodern bigots as Cromwell and William of Orange. Still, he is no Macauley in this enterprise and I would recommend, instead, the second volume of Simon Schama's splendid History of Britain to the reader seeking a casual treatment of this subject area. Schama goes into almost as much depth as MacLeod, but is a vastly better writer and is considerably fairer in his evaluations of both individuals and issues.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Get Your Dreich On!, January 14, 2008
This review is from: Dynasty: The Stuarts: 1560-1807 (Hardcover)
I've always been fascinated by the Stuarts, and have done my fair share of reading about them, so this book was a shoo-in on my Xmas list. And I'm glad I got it! In no particular order, here are my observations:
*The book is written from a Scottish perspective, which I liked because it gave some new angles. In most books the Stuarts seem to burst full-blown on the scene, with little space given to their background and history in Scotland. Indeed, Scotland itself usually gets only a cameo appearance here and there, and then only in the context of its perpetual alliance with France. This book remedies that, devoting a good bit of detail to the Stewart/Stuart family history and their relationship to their mother country. The role of Scottish affairs in the politics of the day is also treated, which gave me some new insights, which I very much liked.
*The book is very readable, dealing with the Stuarts in terms of their personalities and personal lives more than their role in politics. If you want an exhaustive treatment of the political aspects of their reigns, this might not suit you, but it does bring the monarchs to life.
*The author presents the strengths and weaknesses of the Stuarts pretty forcefully, but without telling the reader what to think. His description of James II, for example, begins with a repeating litany of how "stupid" (his word) James was, but then compliments James on his eye for detail and military ability. It's left for the reader to decide what outweighs what. That can be a little disjointing, but in the end I appreciated it because it will make the reader want to check out other books to help him/her make up his/her mind.
*The chapter on Charles II points up, yet again, the crying need for a new biography of Catherine of Braganza. I just cannot understand why she always gets glossed over, when she lived a long, eventful, and interesting life. Just for the fact that she introduced tea drinking to England, you would think she'd be sacred to the British, but somehow she keeps getting swept under the rug. I keep hoping to see someone write a bio, but it has yet to happen.
*There are a few Scottish words sprinkled through the book that American readers will need to look up. I won't spoil it for you, but just have a dictionary or Web connection somewhere in the house for when you come across one.
Inevitably, a book this size can really only give a slightly detailed overview of the monarchs. I wish it could've been twice as long, with twice the detail, because it was a really enjoyable read. I would recommend for a Stuart newbie that you read this but also be sure to read a book from an English perspective to get a fuller picture. You won't be sorry you bought this one, though.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
a stunning bit of propaganda, April 14, 2004
By A Customer
This review is from: Dynasty: The Stuarts: 1560-1807 (Hardcover)
No question that, from a modern prospective, the vast majority of Stuart monarchs were tragi-comic characters. What is inexcusable is that this book was published with all its anti-Catholic balderdash. It is a motley collection of undocumented assertions and I should have known not to buy this book when I saw it had no bibliography.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No