Most Helpful Customer Reviews
15 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A good operational history from Manchuko to Guadalcanal., March 8, 2005
This review is from: The Eagle and the Rising Sun: The Japanese-American War 1941-1943: Pearl Harbor through Guadalcanal (Hardcover)
Having read extensively on the subject matter within this book previously, it was nice to read a build up to Pearl Harbor (making the subtitle of the book somewhat of a misnomer) and not just diving into the war in the first chapter. I had read the history of SE Asia preceeding WWII in bits and pieces mainly, but had never read anything where the author skillfully and successfully put it all into a compelling narrative before. Additionally, the author frequently added small biographies of many important historical figures. Some last less than a page, others up to five pages of information (like McArthur). Regardless, these are revealing and convey excellent information to the reader regarding motivations, personalities, and mannerisms. In several cases the author presents evidence about such historical figures in a somewhat objective manner and lets the reader form their own opinion before either lambasting or praising the actions of such figures. Never over the top however. Largely, the author doesn't get into much minutiae regarding combat operations and instead concentrates on policy decisions and operational history and the people that made or reacted to these events. That's not to say there aren't any reference to combat and it's impact, however it's just not a history intended to be that detailed in this regard. Regardless, it is still compelling and highly informative about the personages and policies of the period in question. Overall, a highly regarded operational history with detailed information on the people who made the deicions at the time. Maps are decent, but not detailed and the bibliography is well documented as well. Not an unflawed history by any means, but certainly full of relevant and detailed information in the areas specified earlier.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
22 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Shoddy, December 29, 2003
This review is from: The Eagle and the Rising Sun: The Japanese-American War 1941-1943: Pearl Harbor through Guadalcanal (Hardcover)
I could not finish this book. I had to put it down after finding myself wanting to hurl it across the room at every third page. This book is not "fresh", his opinions and conclusions are hardly "iconoclastic" (let alone having much of a foundation), and the author's tendency to back- and sidetrack is maddening. This book is rife with mistakes, both grammatical and factual. There were enough mistakes, in fact, that I began to doubt the veracity of the few bits of information that I hadn't read before. About the only point on which I agree with Mr. Schom is MacArthur. All due respect to the opinions of other reviewers on this page, but my grandfather knew MacArthur at that time, and had nothing good to say about him. Furthermore, I doubt very much that Mr. Schom intended to, nor do I feel that he did, diminish the heroic efforts of the Battling Bastards of Bataan. That being said, here are a few things that stand out to me as being particularly irksome: Mr. Schom's apology (to the Japanese, I would imagine) for the use of the word "Jap", by historical figures, in his work. Since when do "historians" apologize for the use of material that they may not agree with? Mr. Schom's unfairly harsh treatment of Lt. Kermit Tyler. Lt. Tyler was the duty officer that took the call from Opana Point about the large air contact approaching Oahu. Tyler's attitude merely reflected the attitude of his command. If this were not so, why wasn't a tracking party assigned around the clock? "And thus was cast the proverbial dye, blood-red, as in the imperial flag"[sic]. Words fail me. If one more author describes the angle of FDR's cigarette holder as "jaunty", I'm going to ....well, you get the idea. If you want to read this book, I'll send you mine.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
21 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Avoid it all costs unless you like to laugh, January 7, 2004
By A Customer
This review is from: The Eagle and the Rising Sun: The Japanese-American War 1941-1943: Pearl Harbor through Guadalcanal (Hardcover)
I had high hopes for this work - I specialize on the Pacific campaign and the period covered by Schom is the most vital and interesting of the war. Unfortunately, the book not only fails to deliver anything new, it fails to deliver the old information accurately. Despite the rather impressive footnote section, the massive number of errors (historical and grammatical) call the veracity of the entire work into question. Schom's attempts to offer something new and exciting lead to him focus on ADM Turner, a highly under-rated actor in the Pacific War and someone deserving of far more attention in historiography than he has yet received. But the work's massive flaws dilute even this impact. The errors range from minor to gigantic. Many are small things or even editorial errors; i.e. the statement that the 1922 Naval Treaty limited the USN to 100 million tons of shipping - a rather astonishing amount - or reflecting on ADM Yamamoto eagerly awaiting word of the outcome of the attacks on Pearl aboard his flagship YAMATO - a peculiar statement when the YAMATO was not even formally commissioned until mid December 1941 and did not become the Combined Fleet flagship until Feb 1942. Other issues cause problems for the work as well. Schom takes continual personal asides to discuss the upbringings or backgrounds of actors in the events he covers, but they are constantly distracting from the narrative. Other items, like his constant minor snipes at the French performance in the war, are puzzling at best. He tosses in glib comments about the Vichy French using American planes to bomb Allied troops in Syria and North Africa without mentioning the little fact that both areas were being invaded by British or American forces. Likewise, he somewhat snidely comments on the Vichy government's decision to break diplomatic relations with England in July 1940, but again fails to mention the minor detail that it followed the British attacks against the French naval forces at Oran. None of these are central to his work, but all call into question the balance and research of the views provided to the reader. While all historians (myself included) have axes to grind, care needs to be taken to present more balance and background - particularly if authors wish to take time away from their topic to address tangential issues. Overall, I had high hopes for the book that were invariably dashed. Though the book appears well-researched from the extensive notes section, the glaring and continual errors and sidetracking editorials call all of the author's conclusions and balance into serious question and eliminates any utility to this work. So approach with caution...
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|