Eating Between the Lines: A Guide to Food Labels and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more



or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Eating Between the Lines: A Guide to Food Labels on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

Eating Between the Lines: The Supermarket Shopper's Guide to the Truth Behind Food Labels [Paperback]

Kimberly Lord Stewart
4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (15 customer reviews)

List Price: $18.00
Price: $14.61 & FREE Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $3.39 (19%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Tuesday, May 28? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $9.99  
Paperback $14.61  
Image
Save on Popular Books This Summer
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more.

Book Description

February 6, 2007
So many labels, so little time--just tell me what to buy!
If you--like millions of other Americans--still don't know how to read food labels and are frustrated by the hundreds of nutrition and health claims as well as statements like free-range and grassfed, it's time to learn what you're really putting into your body…find out how to select the most healthy foods at the supermarket and still get dinner on the table by 6:00 pm with EATING BETWEEN THE LINES

Shopping is no longer as simple as deciding what's for dinner. Food labels like "organic," "natural," "low carb," and "fat free!" scream out at you from every aisle at the supermarket. Some claims are certified by authoritative groups such as the FDA and USDA, but much of our country's nutrition information is simply a marketing ploy. If you want to know what food labels really mean--and what they could mean to your health--EATING BETWEEN THE LINES will explain why:
 
--Chickens labeled "free range" may never actually see daylight 
--Organic seafood may be a misnomer.  
--The words "hormone-free" on pork, eggs and poultry is meaningless 
--"Low fat" cookies and "heart-healthy" cereals may contain heart damaging trans-fatty acids 

…and more. Organized by supermarket section, from the vegetable aisle to the dairy case, EATING BETWEEN THE LINES also features more than seventy actual food labels and detachable shopping lists for your convenience--and to help bring the best food to the table for you and your family.

Frequently Bought Together

Eating Between the Lines: The Supermarket Shopper's Guide to the Truth Behind Food Labels + In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto
Price for both: $28.58

Buy the selected items together
  • In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto $13.97


Editorial Reviews

About the Author

KIMBERLY LORD STEWART is a contributor for Natural Home Magazine and editor-in-chief of Dining Out Magazine. The recipient of two Association of Food Journalists awards for Food News Reporting in 2004 and the Jesse Neal Business Journalism Award in 2002. Stewart regularly contributes to Alternative Health, Better Nutrition, Delicious Living, Denver Post, Eating Well, Vegetarian Times, and numerous other publications.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

EATING BETWEEN THE LINES (Chapter 1)Greener Acres Without Changing Your Address or Your Politics

Betting the Farm on Organics

"I am a farmer's daughter," I told myself again and again as I knelt on the ground, pushing away the soil to see if the green tint had faded from the pate of new spring potatoes. My sons, then five and two years old, stood by with a sturdy bucket and garden hose to give our bounty a good wash. We tugged at the wilting green tops, expecting to uproot clusters of walnut-sized starchy gems--instead, naked stems. We were stunned to be outsmarted by a sight-impaired mole, with a keen sense of smell. It, too, had patiently waited for the precise moment of agricultural perfection, and it had stripped our potatoes clean from the tops.

With looks of fortitude on their tiny brows, mud on their knees, and shovels perched on their sunburned shoulders, the boys took in their first farming lesson and headed to the back pasture to capture the thief. Our potato experiment came as a directive from my father, a Michigan farmer. "Buy organic potatoes," he said after hearing about a neighboring potato farmer whose kidney had shriveled to an unrecognizable mass. The suspected cause was decades of exposure to potent chemicals applied to his potato crops.

This was perhaps the first fatherly advice I can recall. While nearly all dads dish out dating advice to daughters, most of his paternal advice and our conversations edged around farming and food. After years of estrangement from divorce and what I call unpredictable family weather patterns, our tie was at times as deeply rooted as dandelions or as fragile and bitter as spring radish shoots.

But from season to season, no matter the family climate, his homespun stories about his Midwest hundred-acre woods kept me fastened to a lifestyle that few ever experience in this urbanized society--the family farm. From an early age, my father learned that self-sufficiency was no farther than the backwoods. Orion was his lantern and the oak and maple his companions. As an adult, all he needed to fill the pantry for a year was a fishing pole, a garden, a hog in the pen, a dairy cow in the barn, chickens in the yard, grain in the fields, and a deer hanging in the shed.

He laughed at our potato-thieving mole and his tone let on that I finally understood, at least partially, the complexity and unpredictability of farming. Clever moles are just one of many problems potato farmers are up against. Beetles, blight, and fungus that can wipe out entire crops are common enemies, which is why this particular sector of agriculture has been so reliant on insecticides and fungicides--hence his advice to buy organic potatoes.

This was in the late 1980s, and I couldn't have told you what an organic potato really was or where to find them at the time, even though my address was in California's Central Valley, the nation's fruit, nut, and salad bowl. I had moved there from Manhattan and my prior zip codes included Washington, D.C., Hawaii, and London--all a far cry from my new rural residence. Perhaps my need to grow potatoes (along with peaches, plums, tomatoes, and cucumbers) was due to my desire to play catch-up. Conceivably, by playing in the dirt with my two boys I could make up on lost father-daughter years. Like reading through a family album of long-forgotten relatives in one afternoon, my hope was to learn about my familiar farming ancestry in one growing season; instead it's taken me more than twenty years.

In time, the navy ordered my husband to more suburban settings in Canada, Italy, and Colorado, but I didn't forget my father's advice. Still, organic vegetables were hard to find and the added expense wasn't something I could easily afford. For many years I was what the industry calls a cherry picker. If organic produce was on sale and within easy reach I bought it; otherwise there were no organic potatoes in my shopping cart.

It wasn't until years later, during my first job in journalism, that I realized my father's down-to-earth advice did indeed have merit. I was thirty-five years old and working as an unlikely intern for a media and publishing company that served the health-food industry. The industry is known for utopian ideals and very liberal views. As I was a navy wife, my politics leaned toward the center and my wardrobe didn't include a single pair of Birkenstocks.

What's more, my relatives who made their living tilling the Midwestern soil were nothing like this breed of farmers. It seemed that all the organic supporters I interviewed staked their entire being on organic farming. For them it was a passion, almost a religion. Even my sister-in-law, who had lived in Seattle for decades, packed up and started a Community Supported Agricultural (CSA) farm in Mount Vernon, Washington. She farms as many as forty different items, including fruits, vegetables, eggs, and flowers, for her customers who collect their weekly share of food directly from Riversong Farm.

Why Buy Organic Produce?

Even with my loose ties to farming and my work in food journalism, which at the time was smack dab in the middle of the organic food revolution, I still needed pragmatic, methodical, Midwestern-style answers that transcended emotions. During some particularly tight financial months, the higher price for organic food was just too costly.

Most likely you've read, as I had, that organic fruits and vegetables are not subjected to pesticides. But why then were there newspaper headlines saying that organic foods had pesticide residues from chemicals like DDT? I'd been taught in journalism school, "If your mother says she loves you, check it out." I needed facts to justify a thinner wallet. Doubts, along with these questions, lingered in my mind each time I stood in the produce section:

Was organic food really grounded in strong science or was it tethered by thin threads that could easily break when the next food fad came along?

Are organically grown fruits and vegetables really better for my family?

Did I fear being judged by coworkers, many of whom were single and didn't have a family to feed?

It takes a conventional farm three years to transition to organic; that's at least how long my conversion took. What changed my mind was a report by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), which was backed by the very independent Consumers Union (publisher of Consumer Reports). The list, called the dirty dozen, analyzed pesticide residue levels from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) government records. The no-nonsense list narrowed down the most common foods with the highest pesticide residues. Guess what? Potatoes were on the list. (I know, I should have listened to my dad.)

Photocopy and Clip

Finally, I had a manageable organic directory to work from. Instead of feeling guilty about not filling my cart with every organically available food and panicking that I was spending my kids' college funds, I now could use a workable list--one that fit my budget and relieved my doubts.

It's important to know that the residue levels on the dirty dozen are after these foods were washed and peeled for normal consumption. That said, I think (and hope) you can tell I'm not an alarmist. In general, the foods listed in the first two columns are higher in pesticide residues than others. However, to be fair and perfectly clear, the lists are not meant to imply the foods exceed EPA tolerable levels for male adults--it's the younger consumers who need more safeguards.

Very few foods ever exceed the EPA limits for adult males for three reasons. First, the agency must account for all pathways to exposure, such as diet, drinking water, and home use of insecticides, which means a piece of fruit is just one piece of the puzzle. It is the EPA's job to determine the health risk of each approved pesticide and set restrictions called tolerances, which is the maximum amount a particular pesticide can be in or on a food. The tolerance is not about pesticide residues; it is an estimate for one's exposure to a particular pesticide or its breakdown product.

Second, the EPA similarly looks at cumulative exposure to groups of pesticides that may cause cancer and considers all the ways we might be exposed, such as inhalation or through the skin. Third, the agency adds a 100-fold safety buffer when it applies the standards for pesticide residues.

Every year the USDA tests for pesticide residues on more than 13,000 samples, purchased at grocery stores, of fruits, vegetables, grains, milk, and drinking water (USDA Pesticide Data Program). In 2004, 76% of fresh fruit and vegetables showed detectable residues, 40% of these contained more than one pesticide, and only .2% exceeded the EPA's tolerable levels.

The EWG examines this same data and narrows it down to forty-six commonly eaten fruits and vegetables. The EWG dirty-dozen list is based on what is called pesticide load, which quantifies how many pesticides were found on a single fruit or vegetable and within the entire commodity. For instance, 92% of the apple samples contained pesticides; of those, 27% contained two pesticides, 24% contained three pesticides, and 12% contained four different pesticides. For potatoes, 79% contained pesticide residues, 52% contained one residue, and 21% contained two types of residues (this is a big improvement since my potato-farming experiment in the early 1980s).

The EWG list is significant, especially for pregnant women, infants, and children, because it raises awareness flags for foods that are commonly eaten by children and by moms-to-be during pregnancy. Ask parents of growing children and they will attest that kids eat a lot, and it's often the same foods again and again. In the 1990s reports began to emerge showing that the tolerable levels for pesticide residues may have been too lenient for kids. What was easily legal and tolerable for an adult male may pose an unnecessary risk to a child or unborn baby.

The issue was twofold: Pesticide tolerance levels had not been adequately analyzed for infants and children. Nor had sci...


Product Details

  • Paperback: 352 pages
  • Publisher: St. Martin's Griffin; First Edition edition (February 6, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 031234774X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0312347741
  • Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.5 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (15 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #76,634 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Kimberly Lord Stewart a award-winning food and health journalist and author. She is known for uncovering deceptive marketing and truth stretching in the food industry. Since 1994, she worked as an editor for publications dedicated to the business of wellness and healthy eating. Her first book, Eating Between the Lines (St Martins Press, 2007), tells readers about the truth behind organic and conventional food labeling. Her work has appeared on NPR, Eating Well, Shape Magazine, USAToday Weekend, Dr. Roizen's You the Owner's Manual radio, WGN and CBS, ABC and NBC television and radio affiliates. Stewart is the current food, wine and spirits editor of Denver Life Magazine and the organic food editor for Examiner.com/Denver. She is former editor in chief of Dining Out, Natural Foods Merchandiser and Functional Ingredients. She has contributed to Eating Well, Denver Post, Natural Home and Garden, Delicious Living, WellWise.org, Lifescript.com, and is recipient of two Association of Food Journalist awards and the Jesse Neal Business Journalism award for coverage of genetically modified foods.


Customer Reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars
(15)
4.3 out of 5 stars
A book that makes sense of all the noise around food labels. Kuviana Ax  |  6 reviewers made a similar statement
I've gone back to the book several times to use as a reference before grocery shopping. Peggy D.  |  3 reviewers made a similar statement
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Clarifies food label confusion!! March 12, 2007
Format:Paperback
This book cuts through all the hogwash and gets straight to the truth. When there is so much confusing and conflicting information in the media a good

reference guide on food labeling and healthfulness is essential to make appropriate choices. And this book is a great reference guide.

It's also an enjoyable read, with heart warming family stories mingled throughout.
Was this review helpful to you?
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Educational, Entertaining, Excellent! May 19, 2007
Format:Paperback
Ten reasons I highly recommend Kimberly Lord Stewart's "Eating Between the Lines":

1. It's informative without being didactic or boring.

2. The anecdotes are entertaining and thought-provoking.

3. Several times during the reading of this book, I found myself saying out loud: "Wow! I didn't know that!"

4. I've gone back to the book several times to use as a reference before grocery shopping.

5. The book now holds an esteemed place in my house--above the stove with my dog-eared cookbooks.

6. It's obvious that Ms. Stewart has thoroughly researched this subject.

7. This has to be the best treatise on U.S. food laws written for the average American consumer.

8. I understand now the differences and similarities between organic, natural, farm-raised (etc, etc.) foods.

9. There is no agenda here---just thorough, reasoned, interesting writing.

10. Ms. Stewart's passion for food leaps right through the pages of "Reading Between the Lines"!
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Accurate, Practical & Thorough March 23, 2007
Format:Paperback
As a skeptical journalist who has a working knowledge of the traditional and natural food industries, I found Ms. Stewart's book deeply researched and factually complete. Books such as this one oftentimes are written in a frantic tone, but the author keeps her cool and, with the personable confidence of an expert, assumes her reader is intelligent. A "foodie" who can engage an average reader for 300 pages without new recipes for chicken is rare, which speaks to the importance of the book's subject. To take just one example, everyone knows you should eat fish for the heart-health benefits, just as everyone knows you should not eat fish because it's full of manmade toxins. Ms. Stewart is able to break this complex subject down into seven points for the reader to consider, one of them being that the chances of getting cancer from fish are less than the risk of getting heart disease from not eating fish. The operative word here is balance--the author generally takes the middle road in her advice and criticisms. (Again, unlike so many other "health" books, whose predictable message is "do this or die.") Finally, this book covers pretty much everything the average grocery-store shopper would need to know. Especially helpful are the explanations of what common food labels--USDA Organic, USDA Grade A, Certified Humane, for instance--mean, don't mean, and have come to imply (sometimes exclusively to the benefit of the manufacturer). You read this book and realize that even selecting common food items is becoming complex. That would be yet another burden among the many for today's consumers, if it did not directly affect their health and well-being, as well as that of their families, the planet and its creatures. The one criticism that could be made is that food laws and interpretations are constantly changing, and this book, by its nature, can only capture a certain period of time. One hopes for a follow-up version of Eating Between the Lines.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
1.0 out of 5 stars Eating Between The Lines
I guess the book is OK. I quit reading it once I realized it wasn't what I was looking for.
Published 21 months ago by mamaw
5.0 out of 5 stars read this book
Excellent book. It also has a chart with over pesticide veggies and fruit. I make copies and pass them out to everyone.
Published on July 31, 2010 by Nancy Tropkoff
1.0 out of 5 stars HORRIBLE
There is a cover up on the dangerous canola oil. This book does not cover canola oil thoroughly hinting that the author is a proponent of genocide. Read more
Published on April 25, 2010 by OM
3.0 out of 5 stars Informative---not an easy read.
I purchased this book, thinking it would be a FUN read. It definitely was informative, but not something I could just breeze through. Read more
Published on September 16, 2009 by M. E. Young
5.0 out of 5 stars Awesome!!
This book really is awesome! The author as a no nonsense way of explaining information to you. This book has been an excellent help in my school work, and the search inside the... Read more
Published on November 14, 2008 by A. Branson
5.0 out of 5 stars Very interesting.
Eating Between the Lines has a wealth of information about food. This book explains what the product labels really mean. I've never come across such a book before. Read more
Published on October 15, 2007 by Brenda Foust
5.0 out of 5 stars Real world food shopping advice
I like this book because it's not agenda-driven or political. Kimberly Lord Stewart focuses on the yawning gap between a lot of people and the healthy food they want to eat, and... Read more
Published on May 25, 2007 by Lisa Greim
5.0 out of 5 stars What I didn't know was hurting me
I've been a professional chef for 28 years and was startled by the huge amount of product information I was able to learn from Kimberly Lord Stewart's research. Read more
Published on May 22, 2007 by Daniel J. Witherspoon
5.0 out of 5 stars Best Food Resource
Even though I am a sustainable food business owner, I found so much new and helpful information in this book. Read more
Published on April 29, 2007 by C. Szymanski
5.0 out of 5 stars Thank you for this enlightening book
If all Americans took this book to heart (and to the supermarket), we would be a far healthier nation. Read more
Published on April 27, 2007 by Veronica F.
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews


Books on Related Topics (learn more)


Forums

Topic From this Discussion
Food Labels Be the first to reply
Have something you'd like to share about this product?
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions




Look for Similar Items by Category