|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Wonderful book on an important--but nearly forgotten--topic,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Eating for Victory: Food Rationing and the Politics of Domesticity (Hardcover)
Most of the people who were most affected by food rationing--the housewives who had to provide healthy meals for their families--are gone now. Everyone remembers Rosie the Riveter, but few remember the Domestic Army, and the propaganda that accompanied the policies of the Office of Price Administration, by the government, and more importantly by Madison Avenue. This book looks at the mechanics of mandatory food rationing, and then considers the politics and propaganda involved in making food rationing work.
The book is filled with a variety of examples of government rhetoric, Madison Avenue advertising, cookbook instructions, radio broadcasts, diaries, letters, posters, and comments. The scope of research involved in this study is staggering. The book is very well written. It is often difficult to turn a dissertation into an interesting book, but Amy Bentley has succeeded admirably. There are a number of intersting photographs and illustrations, although I would have liked to see even more. This is a fascinating book, and deserving of a much larger audience.
2 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
An earnest, academic look at Homemakers & the Home Front,
By Jayne MacManus (San Francisco, CA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Eating for Victory: Food Rationing and the Politics of Domesticity (Paperback)
During World War II, the United States didn't ration their food as long or as desperately as the Brits and other Europeans had to. It's still interesting to see what the home front had to make do with.In "Eating for Victory", baking gets the political treatment as a point of women's rights and also as propaganda by the government and media to keep women in traditional roles. The skillful, well-dressed homemaker associated most often with 1950s TV moms like June Cleaver is really the Wartime Homemaker.As a reader, one's context of time needs re-adjustment. It used to be the Basic Seven, not the Four Food Groups. People didn't know eating habits could lead to heart disease, and dieting was not in the national mania for women.Perhaps the biggest time warp is understanding the uproar over African American women leaving domestic "Mammy" jobs in affluent homes for higher paying war work. Fathoming that old-world structure of educated women feeling "put-out" and oblivious or resentful of the cultural liberation going on -- it's a real step back in time and mores. (Imagine if Renée on the current TV show "Ally McBeal" were the live-in maid and not Ally's best-friend /roommate / fellow-lawyer.) Amy Bentley's style doesn't escape the scholarly soundbites and droning hum of dissertations. There's enough homey details, however, to make it tolerable. And clearly, Bentley's given her subject careful thought and personal investment. Not every woman was Rosie the Riveter or a Pin-up Girl, but every Rosie and Pin-up was a Wartime Homemaker to some degree. Bentley's book is one of the few to recognize this and to give it due credit.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Eating for Victory: Food Rationing and the Politics of Domesticity by Amy Bentley (Hardcover - November 1, 1998)
Used & New from: $299.75
| ||